Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Permissions issue with CIFS mounted share"
2006 Jul 07
0
Permissions issue with CIFS mounted share
I've tried some internet and list searching, but I haven't been able to
find anybody with the same issue. It's hard to search for "samba cifs
force user problem" because it hits nearly every samba tech support
question ever asked.
The smbfs kernel module disappeared from the stock fedora kernels
recently *crycry* Now my shares that were mounted via smbfs have to be
mounted
2006 Jun 12
2
Fedora Core 5 & CIFS - please help!
After trying a couple of Linux forums & no help I'm hoping that somebody
on the samba list knows how to solve this issue. I'm having a problem
with CIFS. This is a fresh installation of Fedora Core 5. I have 3 XP
machines that I mount by CIFS in my fstab. CIFS mounts the shares with
no problem. I can view and read files on the shares. The problem I have
is when I try to copy a file
2013 Feb 01
0
Wrong acl and permissions on cifs mounted share
Hi everyone
I have these shares in smb.conf:
[home2]
path = /home2
read only = No
[home]
path = /home2/home
read only = No
I mount [home] on a Linux client like this:
mount -t cifs //hh1/home2 /home2 -osec=krb5,rw,multiuser
Here is the output of the mount command:
//hh1/home2 on /home2 type cifs
2012 Jul 28
2
Kernel 3.4.6: cifs problem
Hallo,
I've just tried kernel 3.4.6, self compiled, with the ".config" from
kernel 3.3.7.
Samba version 3.5.14 (slackware)
When I run a script with (among many other lines) the command
mount.cifs //$share/$src /path/to/$target \
-o noperm,sec=ntlmv2,$Loginparms
(which runs without any problem under kernel 3.3.7) then I get an error
message (some cifs problem), and the
2010 Apr 30
1
Cannot mount Windows 7 share with CIFS Error 112 Host is down
Hi. I just got a new Windows 7 Home Edition computer and am unable to mount its shares on my Linux system.
I'm running Fedora 11, samba 3.4.7
I have no trouble mounting shares from XP systems on the network using the mount command below.
I can access the Windows 7 share with no problems using smbclient on Linux.
The Windows 7 share is accessible from the XP systems.
Here is the mount
2007 Sep 27
4
current state is silly?
The following manifest is causing an error/warning and permissions are
not set. i do not understanding why:
file { "/diskless/swaps":
ensure => directory,
owner => nfsnobody,
group => nfsnobody,
mode => 1777;
}
The error is:
Fri Sep 21 14:53:05 EST 2007
2020 Feb 23
1
doveadm(nfsnobody) Error
Please tell me about maillog Error.
I get the following error in maillog?
???
dovecot: doveadm(nfsnobody): Error: sync: User init failed
dovecot: doveadm(nfsnobody): Error: User initialization failed: Namespace
'': mkdir(/var/lib/nfs/Maildir) failed: Permission denied
(euid=65534(nfsnobody) egid=65534(nfsnobody) missing +w perm: /var/lib/nfs,
dir owned by 0:0 mode=0755)
???
I am using
2013 Jun 02
0
does cifs understand acl's?
4.0.6 file server for a 4.0.6 domain, reproducible with a 3.6.12, and
3.6.15 file server.
File created in a share are created according to the acl set, but not
when mounted by cifs:
Here is a share
[test]
read only = No
path = /home/test
Here is the acl:
getfacl test
# file: test
# owner: root
# group: staff2
# flags: -s-
user::rwx
group::rwx
other::r-x
default:user::rwx
default:group::rwx
2012 Oct 23
1
Permission "nfsnobody" and mounting an nfs share in a datacenter
Hi
A datacenter I use provides mountable nfs shares that are provided
through a subnet, the only person having access to the nfs share is me.
If I do this:
mount -t nfs 192.168.53.21:/USERNAME /mnt/share/
then I get the share:
[root at hostname /mnt/share] #>ls -la
total 12
drwxrwxrwx 2 nfsnobody nfsnobody 4096 Oct 9 18:04 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Oct 9 17:55 ..
2011 May 10
1
BUG(?): Incorrect responses for ACL prohibited actions
In a mailbox that has ACL restrictions on both DELETE and EXPUNGE
(i.e. no 'e' or 't' rights), I see the following:
3 UID STORE 3173 (UNCHANGEDSINCE 353) +FLAGS \deleted
3 OK Store completed.
(UID 3173 is not flagged \deleted)
[...]
6 UID EXPUNGE 1:*
6 OK Expunge completed.
(At least 1 UID is flagged \deleted in mailbox)
Shouldn't these commands be returning
2008 Oct 20
1
Two questions
1) A lot (but not all) of my smbd / nmbd logs are going to
/var/log/messages instead of /var/log/samba/ I tried a couple of things
in syslog.conf, but just don't know the magic word for samba logs.
2) I'm getting lots of "couldn't find service" errors. I had:
[data]
path = /data
read only = no
public = yes
browseable = yes
writeable
2003 Aug 15
1
Netware CIFS nlm - linux samba
Dear Gurus,
We're having bizarre problems/behaviour. Admittedly we have an unusual
set-up:
- users on linux desktops (RedHat/KDE) mounting files over SMB using
samba-2.2.5-10 -client and -common rpms.
- files are on a SAN, clustered behind 2 netware servers (6.5), wihch run the
cifs.nlm (netware guy has gone home - can't tell you the version just now)
Files are spontaneously
2012 Oct 29
1
Scenario with CIFS
Hi all!
I'm trying to get samba working with CIFS, mounting a share on a client and
keeping the original file/dir permissions. The problem is that after I
(successfully) mount that share by CIFS, I can't write anything in it,
because I get a 'Permission denied' error. smbd version is 6.3.6.
My testparm is:
root at samba:~# testparm
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
2008 May 29
0
nfsnobody 65534 vs 4294967294
Hi, I just had a couple of questions about nfsnobody.
We run a very large NFS infrastructure based off of a NetApp, and we're
been discussing whether or not it is necessary to have 64 bit nfsnobody
as 4294967294. I understand the reasoning behind this (2^32 - 2 gives
you a max UID), but we're having issues since we run multiple
architectures. The UID doesn't play nice across
2006 Aug 04
2
Dovecot fails to come up when using ACLs (1.0.b5)
Hi,
I just had a go at enabling ACLs with 1.0b5. As per the docs I've done the configuration bit:
protocol imap {
..
mail_plugins = acl
}
...
plugin {
acl = vfile:/usr/local/etc/dovecot-acls
}
and created the dovecot-acls file. When I start dovecot, it hangs for a few
seconds and dies with this:
[root at redback root]# /etc/init.d/dovecot restart
Shutting down IMAP daemon
2019 Feb 21
0
Assistance with doveadm backup...
Sorry for being such a newbie when it comes to scripting. Created a directory for the backups on the network mounted volume. Changed the appropriate path and am getting this:
dsync(root): Error: user nfsnobody: Initialization failed: Namespace 'INBOX.': mkdir(/mnt/maelstrombackups/vmailbackup/nfsnobody) failed: Permission denied (euid=5000(vmail) egid=5000(vmail) missing +w perm:
2008 May 27
3
mount shares with path
I need to mount a share I don't have direct access to only to one subdirectory.
I have no problems mounting other shares on the same windows server with
the same permissions.
I can mount the volume through gnome "Connect to Server...", but I need it
on the filesystem.
What is working:
smbmount //server1/share1 /mnt -o -fstype=cifs -noperm,credentials=/etc/auto.smb.server1
What is
2007 Jul 12
0
Linux CIFS-access problem since samba 3.0.25(a/b)
Hi there,
at first, the following scenario is used in our environment:
Server-Side:
- One Samba PDC using 3.0.24 release with TDB-backend.
- Some Samba member servers serving files, home-dirs, etc.
Client-Side:
- Windows XP-Clients.
- Windows Vista Clients (testing).
- some Linux Ubuntu Distro (Feisty) Clients, using CIFS to access the
samba-shares.
fstab-entry of the Ubuntu-clients:
2010 Apr 21
3
Help with NFSV4 server
Hi Everyone,
I have been trying to setup an NFS v4 File Server but have come across
an odd issue. Mounting the /nfs4exports/share appears to be successful
and the information displayed about partition size and free space seem
correct but if I try to do anything inside the mounted directory the
client will just hang. Does anyone have any idea what I am missing?? I
have try disabling all
2023 Mar 09
1
CIFS client mounts meta ops 30 times slow than server
Also from my observation, based on network packets and time measurements,
it seems the CIFS clients haven't done any sort of cache.
For example, doing a "ls" for 5 times on the same folder within a
short period of time. The network packet sizes are almost equal every time
and the time it takes is similar.
Isn't there supposed to be some page cache or dentry cache that could