similar to: I think CIFS is severely broken

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "I think CIFS is severely broken"

2006 Aug 24
1
can't write to cifs shares
Hello everyone, First, I sent this E-Mail to the samba-cifs but it seems nobody is on that list because I cannot find any archives so I'll give this list a shot. I'm David. Just joined the list. I am having a severe problem with cifs. Could someone help me out here? For some reason, I cannot write to the shares that I mount no matter what I try. I added this to my fstab file:
2006 Aug 31
2
vim timestamp issues on CIFS mounted shares
First: this is my first post on this list so any suggestions, let me know. I recently had to make the move from SMBFS to CIFS when I upgraded from Fedora 4 to 5. Changing settings in my /etc/fstab was easy and no errors come up but now I'm having an issue very similar to post I found on your list that got no response back in April: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-April/119813.html
2007 Jan 12
2
syslinux et al misbehave severely when BOOT_IMAGE= is present on append-line already
Hello! SSIA - when syslinux sees 'BOOT_IMAGE=' on the append line, something seems to go terribly wrong (didn't investigate in detail). You don't even get to see a boot-prompt, even if you try to force it. pxelinux shows the same problem, so I figure it's something generic in the config parser ... Best regards, Andreas P.S: and thanks for this software ;) -- "The
2006 May 23
0
Error starting DomU (Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found)
Hi, I am not able to start a new domainU on FC5. To start the new domain I give command xm create -c domU.conf vmid=1. This gives me the following error: VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. Call Trace: <ffffffff80128d62>{panic+134} <ffffffff801083a6>{init+908}
2006 Oct 21
1
zaptel 1.2.10 make problem
Hi iam installing zaptel 1.2.10 on my FC5 when i make iam getting following error any one suggest me whats wrong, i have installed source also in the same server. grep: /lib/modules/2.6.15-1.2054_FC5/build/include/linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory ZAPTELVERSION="1.2.10" build_tools/make_version_h > version.h.tmp if cmp -s version.h.tmp version.h ; then echo; else \
2007 Feb 21
1
Problem Installing Zaptel
While trying to compile zaptel 1.2.8 on a FC5 I get the following error: /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5smp/build make -C /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5smp/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8 modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5-smp-i686' CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8/zaptel.o In file included from /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8/zaptel.c:40:
2006 Jul 31
1
Issues with cifs mounts following Samba upgrade to 3.0.23a
My LAN includes a server machine running FC4, with several shares mounted with Samba. Yesterday, I upgraded the packages on the FC4 machine, and these included Samba, which is now at 3.0.23a. Unfortunately, this seems to have broken the mounted shares for my Ubuntu 6.06 installation on my Acer 1682WLMI laptop. The cifs module on Ubuntu reports as version 1.39. The symptoms are that I can
2013 Aug 05
3
Need support
dear Samba team, Today we have used samba ver. 3 as primary domain controller at my company. To improve the Samba technology and feature to support our business , we want to upgrade to Samba 4. Is there any tools or support to provide upgrade solution from Samba 3 to samba 4 ? For the information current Samba version we are used and running on Mandriva : samba-common-3.0.23b-7mdv2007.0
2006 Jun 07
2
Xen problem in AMD Athelon(tm) XP 2400+
Hi, I have the following configuration for Xen 3.0 OS: Fedora core 5.0 Processor: AMD Athelon(tm ) XP 2400+ RAM: 1GB I have installed the following RPM into this machine. xen-3.0.1-4.i386 kernel-xen0-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5.i686 kernel-xenU-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5.i686 After rebooting the machine..i have choose the Domain0 option to boot in domain0. But it show''s some hardware
2006 Jul 25
2
Compile from sources
I''ve compiled xen-3.0.2-2 from sources. I''ve went to the end without errors. The ./install.sh script have been created the /etc/grub.conf file as it : # initrd /boot/initrd-version.img #boot=/dev/hdc default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Fedora Core (2.6.15-1.2054_FC5) root (hd0,0) kernel
2006 Aug 23
1
Unicode::MapUTF8
hello when I try to install samba 3.0.23b I get this error error: Failed dependencies: perl(Unicode::MapUTF8) is needed by samba-3.0.23b-1 is this perl module required since 3.0.23b? and why? can you use 3.0.23b without it? werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
2006 May 12
4
fc5 and link to sources?
Just installed fc5, installed correct kernel source, and trying to compile zaptel-1.2. Changed the link in /lib/modules/2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 to point to /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES. Like: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 May 12 15:21 build -> /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES A 'make install' still complains with: make -C /lib/modules/2.6.15-1.2054_FC5/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel-1.2 modules make[1]:
2006 Aug 10
4
FW: HELP -- Problem with access list on samba 3.0.23b but not on 3.0.20c PDC
-----Original Message----- From: M. D. Parker [mailto:mike.parker@ga.com] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:02 AM To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject: HELP -- Problem with access list on samba 3.0.23b but not on 3.0.20c PDC I am using samba with NO windbind and a configuration file that has worked for years stopped working at 3.0.23b. The affect was that my [netlogon] area was not being
2006 Sep 11
2
3.0.23b -> 3.0.23c
I portupgraded my working 3.0.23b PDC on FreeBSD 5.5 to 3.0.23c and found that all workstations could not login. The log file reads: get_md4pw: Workstation PC01$: no account in domain I ran pdbedit -L, and it returned nothing. I use tdbsam backend; all user accounts show up fine with 3.0.23b. Now they are missing. I deinstalled 3.0.23c and switched back to 3.0.23b. Everything is then back
2006 Aug 10
1
Compiling and Configuring Samba for Mandrival
Mates, Since nobody is building binaries for mandriva, I thought I would share a quick cheat sheet for those who want to compile from source to update 10.2 from 3.20 to 3.23. Here goes: 1. Download samba-3.0.23b.tar.gz to your local machine (a given...) 2. Unzip it: tar xzvf samba-3.0.23b.tar.gz 3. Change to the source directory: cd samba-3.0.23b/source/ 4. Make sure you are
2006 Aug 09
1
"make -j"
So, I'm building 3.0.23b for Slackware (since they don't have it out yet[1]), and I've noticed these two lines in the script that Slackware uses to build Samba 3.0.23 from source (which I'm modifying to build 3.0.23b): # -j options don't seem to work... make Anyone know why that comment might be there? Is it true that Samba can't be built with "-j2" or
2006 Sep 02
2
Local groups invisible (ldapsam & 3.0.23b, 3.0.23c)
Hello all, I'm running samba3 as domain controller. I have upgraded samba from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23b and faced an issue with groups display: samba does not see any groups. "net rpc group -U Administrator" returns empty set. usrmgr.exe does not show any groups also. Groups are present in ldap, nss_ldap works fine: # id asv uid=2005(asv) gid=513(Domain Users) groups=513(Domain Users),
2006 Aug 08
0
Samba 3.0.23b Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Where does he get those wonders toys?" -- The Joker (Batman 1989) ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is
2005 Dec 30
4
Cifs client
I've been using the latest cifs 1.8 client at http://linux-cifs.samba.org/ with Fedora 3 and RHE 4. This client seems to have a lot of issues that I did not notice when using smbfs. It seems like when there is an issue with connectivity to a windows machine, and you try to access a cifs mount, the entire session locks up. I basically have to kill the session, log back on, and then there is no
2006 Sep 06
2
Problem with "Security=ADS" and domain users afer upgrading to 3.0.23c
Hello all, I am not sure if this is a bug or a feature of the newly released Samba 3.0.23c. I had this samba.conf working fully ok for smbd 3.0.23b : [global] map to guest = Bad User guest account = nobody disable netbios = Yes lanman auth = No unix charset = ISO8859-15 display charset = ISO8859-15 printing = bsd workgroup = OAAD