similar to: Rogue process

Hi, this is an old problem it was worse in the pre-3.5.0 releases, on solaris 10 all the cpu gets consumed by fcntl calls: 7963: fcntl(22, F_SETLKW64, 0xFFBFE050) = 0 7963: fcntl(22, F_SETLKW64, 0xFFBFDE78) = 0 7963: fcntl(22, F_SETLKW64, 0xFFBFDF58) = 0 7963: fcntl(22, F_SETLKW64, 0xFFBFDF70) = 0 7963: fcntl(22, F_SETLKW64,

I have three users whose smbd processes will suddenly go rogue and start sucking up CPU time. It isn't guaranteed that every time they log in, that their process goes rogue, but it happens a lot. At that time I see that those smbd processes have an effective UID of the person's username, and a real UID of root. Everyone else's is always EUID root and UID root. I haven't a clue

This is a follow-on to my previous message about some 3.0.23b Solaris smbd processes going rogue and eating CPU time. One characteristic of the processes are that the effective UID of the process is the user's UID, rather than root's which is what a see for the well behaved processes. Any ideas how that could be happening so that I can get closer to a solution? Thanks. -- Jonathan M.

My operating system is Solaris 8 SPARC and it runs Samba 3.0.1 Any suggestions? I have included configuration/logs and traces. This is the smb.conf file: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 151.184.34.182 (151.184.34.182) # Date: 2003/09/17 20:34:48 # Global parameters [global] netbios name = dali workgroup = DALIUNIX passdb backend = tdbsam os level

Hi, one of the sip-extensions we created always returns busy when someone tries to call the phone. The extension itself can place calls. We're using snom360 phones with the latest firmware. On every one of those phones when we register with the sip-extension, we've experienced the same problem. This is the output from sip show channels: Peer User/ANR Call ID Seq

Hi folks. Periodically a workgroup shows up on our network with an inappropriate name. We're trying to find the best way to track this down as it's quite intermittent. We can obviously look for announcement messages (in broadcast packets on ports 138/139), but this must be done on each subnet and we have enough subnets that this would be rather tedious and at best, a last resort. The

hi all- I am currently running dovecot 0.99.10p2 on OpenBSD-3.4-snapshot. It has been very stable, but I have recently noticed that I am having problems when checking IMAP-SSL mail with Mac OS X clients. There are not problems using Mozilla or Outlook on Windows, but Mac clients (Thunderbird, Mozilla, Mail.app) all exhibit the same behavior - they can check and send mail, but I end up with a

I seem to notice these two processes running with top. Netstat hasn't been issued by me and cant be killed with the START state. Can someone enlighten me on these processes. FreeBSD dracula.transylvania.net 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #4: Sun Dec 4 00:22:01 EST 2005 root@dracula.transylvania.net:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/BLEACH i386 The box doesnt run ssh or telnet just postfix

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97508 Bug ID: 97508 Summary: Rogue Legacy 4th area with corrupted textures Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

Hi, I am still struggling with the printing in a AD2008 R2 environment I changed to 3.2.15 by now. Still very slow, I am running on solaris 10. Not sure if my clients are so chatty by now but it is really killing any performance. Using truss I see loads of: 19702: fcntl(17, F_SETLKW64, 0xFFBFE640) = 0 19702: fcntl(17, F_SETLKW64, 0xFFBFE150) = 0 19702: fcntl(17,

Hi All, We're having some problems using Samba and supposedly "standalone" rogue NT servers on one of our network domains. When an authenticated samba-served NT domain user on a client machine tries to access a share on a non BDC/PDC NT server that it part of the same samba domain, the standalone NT server sends it a message saying "Your logon time at NTDOMAIN has

Anybody? 2017. 05. 02. 10:48 keltezéssel, Papp Bence via samba írta: > Hi! > > > I need some help. > > We use samba4 as AD, and now when clients connect to server, samba > process stuck at 100% cpu. > > samba Version: 4.3.4 Release: 13.el6 > > > top: > > 3777 root 20 0 131m 46m 28m R 99.7 0.3 219:20.53 > /usr/local/samba4//sbin/samba -D

Here is the smb.conf: https://pastebin.com/LUf4MUF0 Thank you very much. 2017. 05. 09. 18:15 keltezéssel, Dante F. B. Colò via samba írta: > Did you install it from binary packages ? compiled from source ? Post your smb.conf here. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: "samba" <samba at

I have a reproducible intermittent error large site - "The specified network name is no longer available". This happens when copying large files. Below is part of log level 10 output & strace. Sorry for the long posting. I will probably need to put the loglevel 10 attached to a bugzilla - but thought I would try the lists initially. RHEL4 samba-3.0.25b-1.el4_6.4

Did you install it from binary packages ? compiled from source ? Post your smb.conf here. ----- Original Message ----- From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 1:01:10 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] samba process use 100% cpu Anybody? 2017. 05. 02. 10:48 keltezéssel, Papp Bence via samba írta: > Hi!

The latest version that Western Digital has shipped with the My cloud devices accesses the disk about twice a minute. The access to /dev/sda2 is causing the system to keep the disk from going into standby mode. I don't understand the call to quotactl every minute when no one is trying to access the share. An strace of one of the processes shows the following: poll([{fd=13,

Hi! I need some help. We use samba4 as AD, and now when clients connect to server, samba process stuck at 100% cpu. samba Version: 4.3.4 Release: 13.el6 top: 3777 root 20 0 131m 46m 28m R 99.7 0.3 219:20.53 /usr/local/samba4//sbin/samba -D 24541 csertam 20 0 49260 11m 9048 S 25.1 0.1 0:01.56 smbd -D 7080 squid 20 0 926m 908m 6428 S 9.9 6.2 11:43.50

I think somebody had a similar problem (also on Solaris), but that thread seemed to die. I've compiled (with Sun Studio cc) and installed samba-3.2.1 on a Solaris 10 x64 box, which is a member of a (Windows Server 2003 controlled) domain. I previously had samba 3.0.28a running on the same machine without any problems. Now winbindd is eating up all of the CPU (on the CPU it's assigned

We have experienced some trouble with samba lately. The servers load going from 5 to 20 causing everything to go very slow, but when I use top to check which process could be the cause of the trouble nothing uses CPU cycles. We have about 90% idle CPU usage, but load from 5-20. When I kill samba (service smb stop) the root-smb process still hangs and when I kill it (kill -9) the load goes

One of my smbd processes used 100% cpu. I straced the process and the output follows: washington:~# strace -p 3416 fcntl64(13, F_SETLKW64, {type=F_UNLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=404, len=1}, 0xbfffefa0) = 0 sendto(12, "\3\0X\r\0\0&\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\'\374\f\0\0\0\0\0\16\0\0\0", 26, 0, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(41373), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}}, 16) = 26