similar to: Concern about 3.0.22->3.0.23b upgrade (algorithmic SIDs issue)

I'm using a NT4-style domain on my home network, with Samba 3.5.3 acting as PDC. I would like to transfer PDC responsibilty to a different GNU/Linux machine so I can retire the original PDC. With Windows DCs, I understand this is simple -- just create a BDC, promote it, and remove the old. However, an analogous approach would be problematic here, because in Samba going from one DC to two is

machine (just with an updated OS and hardware.) You are not promoting/demoting domain controllers, and you don't have two DC's active at the same time. -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Michael Deutschmann Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 8:51 PM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba]

Hello all, I'm running samba3 as domain controller. I have upgraded samba from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23b and faced an issue with groups display: samba does not see any groups. "net rpc group -U Administrator" returns empty set. usrmgr.exe does not show any groups also. Groups are present in ldap, nss_ldap works fine: # id asv uid=2005(asv) gid=513(Domain Users) groups=513(Domain Users),

I portupgraded my working 3.0.23b PDC on FreeBSD 5.5 to 3.0.23c and found that all workstations could not login. The log file reads: get_md4pw: Workstation PC01$: no account in domain I ran pdbedit -L, and it returned nothing. I use tdbsam backend; all user accounts show up fine with 3.0.23b. Now they are missing. I deinstalled 3.0.23c and switched back to 3.0.23b. Everything is then back

Hi, Cannot spot the debian binaries for 3.0.23b - please please please as 3.0.23a has some issues regarding domain users and I'm too lazy to compile my own packages Thanks, -- DanB

Hi All, Just upgraded a test box to 3.0.23b and discovered some changes that cause a panic. I had an smb.conf with passdb backend = tbdsam guest The guest bit now causes panic action. log.smbd complains ... "No builtin nor plugin backend for tdbsam guest found" Either the build options have changed or the guest operative has issues. Works OK without guest, but it's been

I installed a PDC some days ago for some 15 users/PCs (w98,2000,xp), with samba 3.0.23b-1 and valid users wasn't working. I'm going to update to 3.0.23c which solves that problem. I'm using smbpasswd passdb backend. In /etc/group I have only two groups. I don't understand very well the changes related to primaryGroupSID and RID commented in previous posts. Please, is it

-----Original Message----- From: M. D. Parker [mailto:mike.parker@ga.com] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:02 AM To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject: HELP -- Problem with access list on samba 3.0.23b but not on 3.0.20c PDC I am using samba with NO windbind and a configuration file that has worked for years stopped working at 3.0.23b. The affect was that my [netlogon] area was not being

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Where does he get those wonders toys?" -- The Joker (Batman 1989) ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is

I portupgraded my samba domain server and domain member to 3.0.23b from 3.0.23 and found that the domain member was not accessible from workstations. The error message: \\HOSTNAME is not accessible. There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request. In the log.winbindd of the domain member, I found: [2006/08/23 22:52:00, 0] nsswitch/winbindd.c:request_len_recv(517)

Hi, How would I make samba re-read group and user information? Is there a .tdb file that needs to be deleted? I have recently added more supplementary groups for a user in /etc/group, but the information isn't coming through in the logs, all I get is this: [2008/06/27 07:51:24, 5] auth/auth_util.c:(474) UNIX token of user 11001 Primary group is 11000 and contains 0 supplementary groups

Yesterday evening I upgraded my FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE Server from Samba 3.0.22 to 3.0.23. This gave me a LOT of work today... :-( This is what I found so far: My Samba-Server is member of a large ADS-Domain. After the upgrade, file based Usermapping didn't work anymore... better: it worked TWICE. (I once opened a PR for that a few years ago :-). So, with LogLevel 3:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Where does he get those wonders toys?" -- The Joker (Batman 1989) ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is

I am running Linux 2.0.30 (Redhat 4.2) and have recently been hacked. I have tightened up security but still feel vulnerable. In running the program mscan which was kindly left on my system I get this. bullnet.co.uk: VULN: linux box vulnerable to named overflow. 194.242.135.145: VULN: redhat linux box running imapd. This is after upgrading to the versions as below. bind-4_9_7-0

[Mod: Warning - we are hitting issues of security policy and that is not what we would like to see here --alex] Brian Koref said: > > Great input... > > As an investigator, many of the compromises I see involve systems > which are 2 to 3 years old. An old slackware box sitting on a .mil > domain, which some airman set up as a test machine. The airman gets > trasferred, and

That one doesn''t work either, but here is a link to their FTP archive where the program resides: http://www.quick.com.au/ftp/pub/sjg/ Hope this helps. -Rick -----Original Message----- From: Pluto <pluto@berlin.snafu.de> To: linux-security@redhat.com <linux-security@redhat.com> Date: Monday, September 22, 1997 3:50 AM Subject: [linux-security] Re: Security Concern.. >

Just read about the Casting gem: https://discuss.gemnasium.com/t/casting-adding-behavior-to-objects-without-using-extend/34 https://github.com/saturnflyer/casting What are the Rails core team''s opinions about using Casting vs. ActiveSupport::Concern usage, Rails delegation, etc.? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails:

I have a module that extends ActiveSupport::Concern. Here is the `included` block: included do after_save :save_tags has_many :taggings, :as => :taggable has_many :tags, :through => :taggings end How can I stub out these calls? I have tried a few ways, but Ruby complains that these methods don''t exist when I try and test the module in isolation. Thanks!

I am running zfs send/receive on a ~1.2Tb zfs spread across 10x200Gb LUNs. Has copied only 650Gb in ~42Hrs. Source pool and destination pool are from the same storage sub system. Last time when ran, took ~20Hrs. Something is terribly wrong here. What do i need to look to figure out the reason? ran zpool iostat and iostat on the given pool for some clue. but still in a state of confusion now.

I have: module MySpike extend ActiveSupport::Concern included do class_attribute :foobar, instance_writer: true end end But, I want to be able to override the class attribute writer and/or instance writer method to do something when the attribute is set via self.foobar = true before or after calling super to set the attribute. Unfortunately, I can''t find a clean way