similar to: Please help concerning my posting from 2004

To anyone who can help: I have two brief questions concerning sapply. Following below is the code for my example. The two problems are described at the end of the code: site <- rep(2:6, each = 12) tillage <- rep(c(1,-1), each = 6, times = 5) carbon <- c(18.23, 16.06, 17.81, 16.07, 17.26, 17.08, 14.92, 15.88, 12.11, 14.23, 16.99, 13.57, 20.34, 20.3,

With this post, I run the risk of causing more of the thing that I speak against. I still think it's important to say it. CentOS mailing list is a technical forum. It is not a political forum. Just reading a thread on bitcoins and the entire thread quickly turned into a political thread with people bitching about everything from Chase Bank to the Russians, and that's just crap.

I understand your point. I was just offering a bitcoin spec file for those who wanted it, no politics in that post, and was met with resistance I suppose I shouldn't have responded to. No rants about the fiat banking system in my original post. Bitcoin building on CentOS without needing an alternate TLS library installed is new, so really that is all I wanted to do was provide a well

Using 'Samba version 2.2.1a' Please could someone offer advice in order to configure the following. I need domain level authentication for most shares, however 1 share needs to be made available to a none domained NT client, such that perhaps share or user level security would be appropriate. How can this be configured on a single samba server. Thanks in advance to anyone who responds

with a h323 client over my gatekepper a call comes over asrerisk to my sip endpoint: == Spawn extension (sip-phones, 01634255122, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/0699073201-528d' -- Executing Dial("H323/ip$10.0.0.124:49638/18690", "SIP/0699073201") in new stack -- Called 0699073201 -- SIP/0699073201-dc61 is ringing -- SIP/0699073201-dc61 answered

Hi everyone, I've got a question concerning the function Box.test for testing autocorrelation in my data. My data consist of (daily) returns of several stocks over time (first row=time, all other rows=stock returns). I intend to perform a Box-Ljung test for my returns (for each stock). Since I have about 3000 stocks in my list, I'm not able to perform the test individually for each

hi, we are using a voip h323 switch. the switch sends all caals to our Gatekeeper (gnugk). gnugk musst send all calls to asterisk and asterisk must do his choice (sip endpoint or out to PSTN) Making calls to our h323 switch works fine over asterisk. what must i configure to get inboung h323 calls from our gnugk to asterisk? any hints for me? thx -- Thomas K?pper 01063 Telecom GmbH &

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:39 AM, <FlorianSchwendinger at gmx.at> wrote: > Thank you for your answer! > I agree with you except for the 3 (Error) example and > I realize now I should have started with that in the explanation. > > From my point of view > parLapply(cl = clu, X = 1:2, fun = fun, c = 1) > shouldn't give an error. > > This could be easily avoided by

On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 15:08 +0100, Stephan von Krawczynski via dovecot wrote: > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:51:14 -0400 > Phil Turmel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > On 3/14/19 7:40 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski via dovecot wrote: > > > > > Sorry I have to write this, but this is again pointing people in a fake > > > security direction.

Hi, I am puzzled with serialize(). It comes down generating identical hash codes for (apparently) identical objects using digest::digest(), which in turn relies on serialize(). Here is an example illustration the issue: ser <- function(object, ...) { list( names = names(object), namesRaw = charToRaw(names(object)), ser = serialize(names(object), connection=NULL, ascii=FALSE)

Hi, I have been working on a new puppet code formatter for Geppetto for some time, and it is now starting to work quite well. The plan is to release it in Geppetto 3.0. If you want to, you can help by sending "formatting puzzles" - i.e. "given input x, produce formatted result y". I am esp. looking for code where it is impossible to follow "the style guide" -

On 03/15/2018 05:25 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:39 AM, <FlorianSchwendinger at gmx.at> wrote: >> Thank you for your answer! >> I agree with you except for the 3 (Error) example and >> I realize now I should have started with that in the explanation. >> >> From my point of view >> parLapply(cl = clu, X = 1:2, fun = fun, c =

Peter Please delete this posting are at least remove the company name. thanks john Question on openSSH and sending file to MVS file formats Remove Highlighting -------------------------------------------------------- Hello, I was looking for Damien Miller, Markus Friedl or Theo de Raadt to

Hi, I have attached an important document via Google docs, Please check the link below for additional security you will be required to sign in with your email before viewing / downloading the document. Click Here to View <http://data.google.com.forumzone.info/> -- Thank You, Abdul Lateef Senior ? Development Barwa Bank Doha Qatar

I can't see any security advantages of a self signed cert. If the keypair is generated locally (which it should) a certificate signed by an external CA can't be worse just by the additional signature of the external CA. Better security can only be gained if all users are urged to remove all preinstalled trusted CAs from their mail clients (which seems impractical). Else an attacker could

Hey I had the same problem some time ago. But here is a solution how to do that, but it''s a bit tricky! REQUIREMENT: THE SYSTEM PARTITION ON THE IMAGE MUST BE THE FIRST PARTITION, AFTER THAT THERE MUST BE ONLY SWAP PARTITIONS!!!! This setup would work, there should be no risk at all: Partition 1 on the image: / Partition 2 on the image: swap space This setup WONT''T WORK, YOU

I completely agree (having said that I'm pretty new to all this so I might be full of it). You should run your own CA if you have an active financial interest in your company (say your the owner). No added benefit to have your certificate certified by a third party, why would they care about that one client). Ofcourse people would say "but ofcourse you would verify your own

Dear Concerns, I would like to share a very strange problem. I am from Pakistan/Islamabad. Last month i was on trainning from Askari Bank Limited (Juniper). Here in Askari i m running NMS--> MRTGs using CentOs 4.4. On trainning i recieved a call from collique saying "when i "su -l" NMS says "root user doesnot exist". and also MRTGs not working. well i was amazed how

Tried sending this message with the original topic On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > Hi, Ian. Cross-posting discussions like this is usually not appreciated > by those who subscribe to both foras, so I'll limit it to the Dovecot > list. Mea culpa. That was an inadvertent mess-up on my part; I did not see the headers, usually going by the list's reply-to

Thank you for your answer! I agree with you except for the 3 (Error) example and I realize now I should have started with that in the explanation. >From my point of view parLapply(cl = clu, X = 1:2, fun = fun, c = 1) shouldn't give an error. This could be easily avoided by using all the argument names in the custerApply call of parLapply which means changing, parLapply <-