similar to: Strange permissions problems

I have a problem with some Samba permissions. Here is the share. [bhs] path = /school/bhs read only = no valid users = @teacher @admin @bhs create mask = 660 force create mode = 2660 directory mask = 770 force directory mode = 3770 T: is mapped to a DFS share with permissions 3777, then the 'bhs' share is a link in the DFS share. I get inconsistent

Was wondering if someone could tell me if this is correct. I want to set up some DFS shares. I have 3 servers with SAMBA/LDAP on them. My first is basically my PDC and the other two are my BDCs. I assume that I will have to set all of this up on each server, so that no matter which server catches the logon, the logon script will get run. Also, if one of the servers was to go down for a

I would like to create a simple menu that would allow a caller to decide whether they want to leave a message or be forwarded to another number (i.e cell phone). Thanks in advance for any insight. Here's my current extension.conf [general] static=yes writeprotect=yes [globals] [default] exten => 101,1,Dial(SIP/101,20) exten => 101,n,Voicemail(101 at default) ;This automatically

It's both in 2.6 and recent 2.6 (for RH ASS2.1 you'll probably need to copy the latest 2.4 defintion, but I don't care for obsolete junk). Index: src/super.c =================================================================== --- src/super.c (revision 1014) +++ src/super.c (working copy) @@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ /* get first two blocks */ for (i=0; i<2; i++) { - bhs[i] = getblk

It would be nice to know how often we get checksum failures. Even better, how many of them we can fix with the single bit ecc. So, we add a statistics structure. The structure can be installed into debugfs wherever the user wants. For ocfs2, we'll put it in the superblock-specific debugfs directory and pass it down from our higher-level functions. The stats are only registered with

I'm trying to add a second extension to my setup. The second device is able to successfully connect to the Asterisk server. I am unable to contact extension 101 from 102 and vise-versa. Also are my context setup logically or is there a better fashion to organize them? My error is at the bottom. Here is the extension.conf [default] ; ; By default we include the demo. In a production system,

There was another tech coordinator that asked the following on our list: > Hey all, I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to give students read/write permissions to a certain drive letter without giving them the ability to delete other (or thier own) files. Currently I have chmod 1770 permissions (read write, but only owner can delete) and one owner (the teacher) for all the files, but

Well, I am still having problems with my samba server. For some reason, I cannot add all of the users in. I am running a batch useradd program. I can get about 450 or so added in, then it gives me an error that the user does not exist when I go to add the last 60 or so. My batch program actually reads in the users name and then does something like: /opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-useradd -a -u

Hi. I am seeing the following in my logs. Happy to downgrade to an earlier version if you think this might be the problem, but dovecot.org is extremely slow (and has been for months) so I found it easier just to pull the latest from mercurial. Thanks. Laeeth Mar 12 20:48:39 indexer: Error: Indexer worker disconnected, discarding 1 reques ts for laeeth at laeeth.com Mar 12 20:48:39

I am working on my permissions and something does not quite make sense to me. Here is what I have set. /DIR (Unix permissions are 3777) Then in samba I have the following [dir] path = /DIR read only = no valid users @teach @student create mask 3660 directory mask 3770 Then from a windows workstation, I create a new directory inside 'dir', and call it 'teach'. The

I have set up Samba so that all users on my small network can read from my one of my Linux shares as well as write to that share. However, when user A saves a file to that share, user B can't open it -- and vice versa. How can I set up samba so that all files written to that share can be read, modified, and deleted by all users? Thanks in advance for an answer to this question.

I've searched around and found a few similar situations where the phone will call out when using a Asterisk server but not receive inbound calls. My issue is a little stranger. If I call out from the phone then the phone will receive the next inbound call. The phone will not receive another inbound call until a call out again from it first. Any ideas? I am using SIP and am using the latest

On 2011-08-09 16:48, John Criswell wrote: > On 8/9/11 6:49 AM, Bjorn Reese wrote: >> I have an optimization pass (FunctionPass) where I need to add global >> constructors. >> >> For cleaness sake I decided to add these in my own module. My module >> is created in my FunctionPass constructor: > > This is not how I would do it. A FunctionPass has

Hi All, I'm currently having trouble with dropped phone calls. The following error message is always in the log. This is a Grandstream GXP-2000 Firmware 1.1.6.16 . The Asterisk box is currently 1.4.22-rc5. The problem has been occurring on other versions also. [Sep 19 15:48:02] WARNING[13657]: chan_sip.c:1958 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on transmission 8acaea6dc4c6e9b5 at

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:09:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > +static int tun_rx_batched(struct tun_file *tfile, struct sk_buff *skb, > + int more) > +{ > + struct sk_buff_head *queue = &tfile->sk.sk_write_queue; > + struct sk_buff_head process_queue; > + int qlen; > + bool rcv = false; > + > + spin_lock(&queue->lock); Should this be spin_lock_bh()?

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:09:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > +static int tun_rx_batched(struct tun_file *tfile, struct sk_buff *skb, > + int more) > +{ > + struct sk_buff_head *queue = &tfile->sk.sk_write_queue; > + struct sk_buff_head process_queue; > + int qlen; > + bool rcv = false; > + > + spin_lock(&queue->lock); Should this be spin_lock_bh()?

Hi All, I'm stumped on this and I looking for some clues to fix this. This is a new install of Slackware 12.1 onto an IBM x330 Server. Asterisk 1.4.20.1 plays the wav files and the Cepstral_Allison Swift just fine, but when I play the gsm files the audio quite choppy. And, the files produced from the MixMonitor don't even record any audio other than noise. I have a hard drive from

On 8/9/11 9:15 AM, Bjorn Reese wrote: > On 2011-08-09 16:48, John Criswell wrote: >> On 8/9/11 6:49 AM, Bjorn Reese wrote: >>> I have an optimization pass (FunctionPass) where I need to add global >>> constructors. >>> >>> For cleaness sake I decided to add these in my own module. My module >>> is created in my FunctionPass constructor:

Hi, I have just signed up with Voxee.com and have attached my Asterisk server to dial them via IAX2. Below is the start of the log which dials the number and promply hangs up when the call is answered, with the logs saying that the channel is not compatiable. I have traced this down to the g.729 codec which I don't have installed. Any ideas on how to force that the codec not be used?

This patch logs(ERROR) -EIO errors just when they are hitted. Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang at oracle.com> -- diff -up ./linux-2.6.29.y.build/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c.orig ./linux-2.6.29.y.build/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c --- ./linux-2.6.29.y.build/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c.orig 2009-04-17 13:55:52.000000000 +0800 +++ ./linux-2.6.29.y.build/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c 2009-04-17