similar to: Samba instead of SBS2k+3

Hi, I am posting my question to both storage-discuss and zfs-discuss as I am not quite sure what is causing the messages I am receiving. I have recently migrated my zfs volume from b104 to b134 and upgraded it from zfs version 14 to 22. It consist of two zvol''s ''vol01/zvol01'' and ''vol01/zvol02''. During zpool import I am getting a non-zero exit code,

Hi, for DAG-to-DAG instruction selection I’ve implemented a pattern, which creates from one SDNode two instructions, something like: def: Pat<(NEW_SDNODE REG:$r1), (INST_OUT (INST_IN), REG:$r1)>; where INST_IN doesn't accepts any inputs and INST_OUT accepts two inputs - one returned by INST_IN and REG;$r1. Is there any possibility to ‘Glue’ two instruction created

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 2:48 PM Przemyslaw Ossowski < przemyslaw.ossowski at googlemail.com> wrote: > Thanks Mehdi for the suggestion. > I want to customize handling of 'load' instruction during processing DAG, > but on IR level I want the 'load' to be treated in different passes as > common load. So I'm afraid that replacing 'load' with Intrinsic

You could hardcode a register for the pseudo instruction to use in the td file. The register allocator will make sure not to clobber it. let uses = [ R1 ], defs = [ R1 ] in { def MYINST : Pseudo<> } On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:25 AM Przemyslaw Ossowski via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I have one more question regarding expanding pseudo instruction. > >

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 3:51 PM Przemyslaw Ossowski via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > as I wrote in mu previous post I wanted to somehow mark one IR instruction > (in this particular case it would be 'load') during dedicated pass, which > will set the marking based on neighboring instructions. Next I wanted to > somehow to convey this marking

Thank you Craig for explanation. Could be the same algorithm used for custom legalizing given node in LowerOperation and ReplaceNodeResults in case results and inputs of the node are illegal? Or actually such situation is impossible and for given node either LowerOperation or ReplaceNodeResults can be only called? Przemek wt., 28 sty 2020, 18:48 użytkownik Craig Topper <craig.topper at

Hello, I’m looking for the best approach which would allow for marking given LLVM IR instruction during IR custom pass and later utilizing that information during DAG Instruction Selection in order to match given pattern based on this marking. I’m wondering if marking IR instruction utilizing Metadata is good idea. But how later pass that information to DAG and appropriately mark in

Hi! I'm quite new to Dovecot. helping my friend to migrate from Courier-IMAP to something more efficient, we are evaluating Dovecot at the moment. I had to prepare 2 small patches for Dovecot to suit our needs, and I've decided to post it here. I'm not fully familiar with Dovecot architecture yet, I'd appreciate if someone could look if these changes make sense (i.e.

Hi, I see that for different targets in classes which inherits from TargetLowering there are implemented both methods: LowerOperation and ReplaceNodeResults What decides that for one given ISD we have to add handling in LowerOperation and for other in ReplaceNodeResults, when for both SetOperationAction is configured to be Custom? Is it related with number of results of given operation and

Hi all, my question is maybe not directly related with LLVM but general with compilers. The common approach is that compilers often don't align stack pointer for leaf functions if the function utilizes stack just for keeping variables of small sizes. I’m wondering what is the benefit of such behavior. Is saving a few bytes of the stack just once worth of such approach? Or maybe

Hello !! When a user edits a file belonging to another user and then saves the file he becomes the owner of that file. Both users belong to the same group and the file can be read or written to by the group members. Server: Red hat 9, kernel 2.4.20-31.9, Samba 3.0.7, unix extensions enabled Client: Red hat 9, kernel 2.4.20-31.9, shares mounted via smbfs or cifs (the same behaviour). Is

Hello, I'd like to clone existing CentOS server. Can anybody recommend any working solution to achieve that ? Regards Przemyslaw Bak (przemol) -- http://przemol.blogspot.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wygraj nawigacje GPS! 14 sztuk czeka. Sprawdz >> http://link.interia.pl/f22f3

Hello, we have installed non-repository based software on our centos servers (e.g. vmware tools). Each time we do 'yum update' we have to run several scripts to check if these software works after update. Sometimes we forget ... It it possible to configure any sort of triggers which will run automatically after 'yum update' ? I'd like to avoid writing shell wrappers for yum

Hi, I have problem with WinBind and Windows SBS 2k sience this monday. When i went back to work (I work as a teacher), my windows server was restarted and my linux workstations have problem: root@komp15l:~# wbinfo -u Error looking up domain users root@komp15l:~# id a id: a: No such user # wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls succeeded root@komp15l:~# wbinfo --sequence KOMP15L : 1

Hi Everyone, http://vuxml.freebsd.org/c4b025bb-f05d-11d8-9837-000c41e2cdad.html A critical vulnerability was found in lukemftpd, which shipped with some FreeBSD versions (4.7 and later). However, with the exception of FreeBSD 4.7, lukemftpd was not built and installed by default. So, unless you are running FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE or specified WANT_LUKEMFTP when building FreeBSD from source, you

Hello. My situation looks like: localnet 10.2.1.0/24 | 10.2.1.1 eth0 (100Mbit) gateway ppp0 (DSL 1MBit/256kbit) | internet On gateway I have some transparent proxy services. I would like to shape traffic incoming from internet and guarantee some bandwidth for non proxy services. When I shape traffic I shape proxy services too. What I can do? With regards Xperience

Hi command im using command bellow on destination server rtying to make keep it in sync after initialy doing doveadm backup -R doveadm -Dv -o imapc_host=src.srv -o imapc_user=test at domain.tld -opop3c_user=test at domain.tld -o imapc_password='pass' -o pop3c_password='pass' -o mail_fsync=never -o mail_prefetch_count=20 sync -f -1 -R -u test at domain.tld imapc: Im using

Hello, one of my users set his password to something surrounded by curly braces, and promptly all access to his mailbox was refused. After looking through the logs I found an entry "Unknown password scheme xxxx", where "xxxx" is the user's password, but without the curly braces. I then browsed through the documentation and there was explained that it is possible to prefix

Hi ! I have a server (Centos 5) that is using a pair of SAS drives to store the data. (Mail server) They are on an adaptec raid controler with a battery backup and write back cache active. >From time to time, I have sever peak io to those data disks (> 400 to 500 iops, > 70 to 100 megs/sec). With iostat, I find that it's almost a write i/o problem. How can I find to which files

All, Given the amount of NULL-pointer dereference vulnerabilities in the FreeBSD kernel that have been discovered of late, I've started looking at a way to generically protect against the code execution possibilities of such bugs. By disallowing userland to map pages at address 0x0 (and a bit beyond), it is possible to make such NULL-pointer deref bugs mere DoS'es instead of code