similar to: XP clients disconnected during trasnfer of larger files tothe samba server

i'm having an issue when transferring large files to the samba servers from an xp client - files about 1GB or larger. about 70% into the transfer i get a network share no longer exists error and the transfer fails. I can pull down from the server fine with no issues. The XP machines are authenticating from a different Samba server though the problem is with that machine as well. Error and

Anyone have any advise on how to allow an inbound caller to leave to voicemail on one extension, and after doing so without hanging up , transfer to another extension to leave another voicemail. I know this can be done when you call into your own voicemail, but I can't seem to find anything on how to it when an unknown inbound caller leaves a message on an extension. Apparently this was a

Hi, I'm having prolems with attended transfer configuration. Does this feature had been implemmented by any of you??? What is the best * version to make this work?? Some sample example?? I'm using like this in features.conf: [featuremap] atxfer => 900 ; Attended transfer My * version was intalled by *@home CD and is 1.0.9. Thanks in advance.

Hi Rafael, comment explanation added now. Thanks. On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > LGTM with a comment explaining the issue. > > On 20 December 2013 03:50, Andrew MacPherson <andrew.macp at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thanks Joerg. > > > > I've made the change you suggested and verified that it

Hello, I still receive this error in my log.samba and when running '/samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names'. Has this been fixed completely? Searching through the archives I see this post https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2013-February/090408.html. Using Samba 4.1.7 with Ubuntu Server 12.04. My understanding is the update still succeeds but the error is

Thanks Joerg. I've made the change you suggested and verified that it still works. I think the noinline is still required though as this function can be called from a couple of places and gdb will want to set its breakpoint on the single function address. Let me know if you think otherwise though. Cheers, Andrew On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger < joerg at

On 04/15/2016 04:36 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > On 4/15/2016 10:08 AM, Johannes Amorosa | Celluloid VFX wrote: >> Hello, >> we're using sambas internal DNS server. >> >> Is there a way to get rid of these messages in logfiles: >> >> /var/log/samba/log.samba: Not authoritative for >> 'static.ak.facebook.com', forwarding >>

when you read. : http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg111972.html says: > >That output > ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure >is usually only seen when the internal DNS server is running. >It's a glitch, which can be ignored atm (all dyn. updates are done OK). > so if you dont want to see that error, switch to bind9_DLZ. Greetz, Louis

On 04/18/2016 07:09 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > On 4/18/2016 12:52 PM, Johannes Amorosa | Celluloid VFX wrote: >> >> On 04/15/2016 04:36 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >>> On 4/15/2016 10:08 AM, Johannes Amorosa | Celluloid VFX wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> we're using sambas internal DNS server. >>>> >>>> Is

I received at least one email suggesting a Windows-based rendering farm - likely to consist of a few rack systems all running 64-bit Windows. I read an article on Tomshardware which gave some decent insight. What can list participants offer on this concept? I don't care _how_ the resource is implemented - virtual machine, cluster, etc. I just want to get the most resources for the money,

I posted this question on the llvm channel on irc. I am new to all of this. And I only found out about LLVA as a result of the irc. And please forgive my erroneous terminology. So let me try this as best I can. I want to know if the code of LLVA/LLVM can be used as a virtual processor in configuring the linux kernel? Maybe you have already encountered this and possibly accomplished it as

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 07:59:06PM -0400, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Derrick M <derrick.martinez at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Gene! > > > > this one is much better > > EXCELLENT! That's what I wanted to see. It iterates through 3 > handles, printing the entire MAC buffer and the handle's memory > address.

Hello, I'm using winbindd with samba 3.0.1. Everything starts up as expected and tests return the expected results (wbinfo and getent). Files created via windows clients are create with the proper ownership and group membership. When I attempt to modify the permissions via the windows security tab (add another group, change ownership for example) I'll get a win pop up saying

Thanks for the confirmation. From the assembly that was sent on the other branch of the thread: > .set .L.str, .L.str.hwasan-3458764513820540928 -3458764513820540928 = 0xd0 << 56 i.e. a "negative" tag. So this appears to be the issue exactly. Peter On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:55 PM Derrick McKee <derrick.mckee at gmail.com> wrote: > Using lld fixes this issue. >

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:08:19AM -0400, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote: > On Aug 30, 2015 8:42 PM, "Derrick" <derrick22 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Gene thanks, here is the output > > > > My IP is 10.2.49.10 > > Img @ 71d89718 = 8cdcd40ca5f0 > > Udp @ 71d89718 = 8cdcd40ca5f0 > > Udp @ 71d89718 = 8cdcd40ca5f0 > > Udp @ 71d89718 =

We finally managed to upgrade from samba 4.1 to 4.2.9 (sernet packages). We have two replicated samba ADs. After the upgrade everything seems to work as expected, but I'm constantly getting this error message in the logs. They weren't there before the upgrade: We used the Updating samba wiki entry as howto[1] The first dc logs this: Failed extended allocation RID pool operation -

Hi, I wish to know, how those class work exactly, where can I find the documentation? or can someone explain to me how a connection is made via those class??? Thanks you very much!!!! Saiho __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

We're using quite successfully a samba 4.1 AD setup authenticating user. We have on an unregular basis mails that can't be delivered because dovecot-pam fails to verify the credentials. I'm trying to debug this and set the loglevel up to 3. I can see an error message being spammed in the log files and can't figure out what causes this. I expect a configuration error somewhere

Hi there I have a Dialogic VFX/40 ESC plus installed on Redhat Linux 8.0 and looking for Channel drivers for this Card. where cann i found channel drivers for VFX/40 ESC ? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041223/d61b3065/attachment.htm

I suspect that this is hitting the issue that I mentioned here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65857#1621335 We may need to do what I suggested there and restrict global tag entropy on non-Android Linux to 7 bits. You can try working around this issue for now by using lld as the linker (-fuse-ld=lld). Peter On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:37 PM Mitch Phillips via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at