Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Re: Samba ftp server"
2006 Sep 12
2
FW: RE Help config. VPN to Samba server - UK Charity
Please can you help with this? I work at a charity and need help to find a
solution urgently or Samba / Linux, might be superseded my 'MS' - Oh my
GOD!!!!
Thanks in advance,
Nick : )
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Gorman [mailto:ngorman@btinternet.com]
Sent: 04 September 2006 21:47
To: Nick Gorman
Subject: FW: RE Help config. VPN to Samba server - UK Charity
-----Original
2000 Aug 31
0
Out of Office Response: samba digest, Vol 1 #18 - 10 msgs
William E. Dent will be away from Wednesday August 30, 2000 to Tuesday
September 5, 2000. Mail is being forwarded to wedent@home.com.
Original Message Text follows:
----------------------------------------------------------
Send samba mailing list submissions to
samba@lists.samba.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
2000 Jan 14
0
I: Samba & cadds5
I've been suggested to get some logs and give a brief description of the
problem I'm encountering with Cadds5 / Samba 2.0.6 and offer them to you ,
via http or ftp , to try to find a solution
I 've collected the logs , can I send them with a description of the problem
Thanks
Stefano Colombo ( scolombo@cdmtc.it )
System / Network Engineer
CDM Tecnoconsulting SPA
v. M.L.King 38/2
2000 Jul 27
0
Samba Domains & Password authenication
Chris Hines wrote:
> I would like to use samba as an NT domain controller for NT 4 & Windows 9X
> and posibly windows 2000. I have configured samba 2.0.7 and samba NTG as
> domain controllers and they seem to work.
>
> We wish our users to use a single password accross UNIX & windows which
> are copied from a central NIS map managed by the University. Some time in
>
1999 Jun 21
0
Cascade PDC and Samba 2.0.4b
A colleague just wrote and said he's had a problem with Samba using a
Cascade ("SLS") PDC. This is odd, as Jeremy tested that rather
recently!
The symptom reported was, with security = domain and password server =
<the SLS server>:
> . When I try to validate
> a login on the samba box against the SLS SAM, I receive the
2000 Mar 09
1
FW: : Re: Multiple smbd processes generated
Dear Dave,
Doesn't this only work if you're using samba as a domain
controller and the client says "net use h: /home"
I've not got it to redirect "//server1/username" to "//server2/username"
when the NIS map says "user server2:/path/&"
Though if it could be done I'd be VERY keen.
Tim
"David Collier-Brown"
2000 Jun 18
0
SUMMARY: Strange Samba/NT compatibility issue
Hello All,
Thanks to David Collier-Brown who pointed me to the oplocks setting,
what was needed was the following:-
oplocks = off
Regards,
Leo
-----Original Message-----
From: David Collier-Brown [mailto:David.Collier-Brown@canada.sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, 15 June 2000 22:54
To: Leo Kliger
Subject: re: Strange Samba/NT compatibility issue
You just got caught by cleint-side caching.
If you
2005 Jun 20
0
FW: samba share problem
Hello,
I will appreciate if you give us some reply on this issue.
Thanks & regards,
Harish Dhumal
-----Original Message-----
From: David Collier-Brown [mailto:David.Collier-Brown@Sun.COM]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 6:22 PM
To: harish.dhumal@ge.com
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: samba share problem
You accidentally sent this to the development list: I've redirected it.
It
2005 Jul 20
1
Re: help me in printer driver
You mean u have no idea to develop printer driver
keshu
>From: David Collier-Brown <David.Collier-Brown@Sun.COM>
>Reply-To: samba@lists.samba.org
>To: keshav chaudhary <keshu82_sh@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: help me in printer driver
>Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:44:53 -0400
>
>[Sent to samba-technical by mistake]
>
>No, but I've forwarded this to the
2000 Jul 28
0
SAMBA digest 2608
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:25:44 -0400
> From: David Collier-Brown <David.Collier-Brown@canada.sun.com>
> To: Luc Lalonde <llalonde@gre.ulaval.ca>, samba@samba.org
> Subject: Re: conditional logon scripts
> Message-ID: <39802A48.CD84F4C6@canada.sun.com>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding:
1998 Nov 02
0
SAMBA digest 1861
Richard Whiffen <whiffen@ici.org> wrote:
> We're having some odd issues with samba and MS Word (And presumable the
> rest of the office suite, but I haven't checked) running on NT 4.0 sp3.
>
> MS Word doesn't seem to obey the umask settings:
> create mask = 0775
> directory mask = 0775
We've had that prblem here: many pc apps rename the
file to be
1998 Feb 17
0
diskless win95 and samba
Clary Harridge asked...
> we are interested in booting Win95 diskless from a SAMBA server.
Peter Debus <pdebus@turing.une.edu.au> cautioned
| Unfortunately there is no other option I am aware of, other than
booting
| from an NT server - which I have been told, but have not experienced
| myself, is painfully slow if booting a whole computer lab at once,
with
| clients timing out and
1997 Dec 18
0
SAMBA digest 1526
Ken Hamer (B83 131) <K.Hamer@axion.bt.co.uk> wrote
> BUT...... After printing a document, Samba appears to hang up the connection,
> although another seems to start pretty quickly.
...
> server.netbios- client.1065 8557 0 8760 0 CLOSE_WAIT
>
> The connection will stay in this state until the user tries to access
> something on the network drive
1998 Jul 27
0
Cache Problems!
You wrote:
| The problem that I'm having is that once a file has been opened from
the
| share, changes made to that file via the WWW interface are not seen by
| the Win95 client, they still get the old file's contents.
This is an artefact of the so-called ``opportunistic lock''
algorithm, which allows client-side caching unless another
pc client attempts to edit the file.
You
1998 Nov 19
0
Samba doesn't fully respect directory permissions?
Mass Sivilotti wrote:
> Granted, the Explorer
> window is EMPTY (i.e., regardless of the actual contents of
> the directory, Explorer shows no files, consistent with
> the UNIX permisssion of not allowing searching), but the very fact
> that the window opens and the directory APPEARS empty is confusing
> some folks. Wouldn't it be better if you got a permission denied
>
1999 Jan 26
0
What kind of [RAID] system works best?
Bill Eldridge <bill@rfa.org> wrote:
> I'm currently testing out some SCSI->IDE RAID 5 systems
> (not banging on them too rigorously at the moment, but
> no obvious flaws so far).
>
> Basically, you get a SCSI interface that the computer sees,
> but the enclosure holds 3 IDE drives, and the whole thing
> snugs into a tower chassis. RAID 5 at about $2200 for
>
1999 Mar 25
0
Subject: copying files samba - win95: drops dead in the middle
"Marc Remijn" <marrem@IAEhv.nl> write
> When copying files from the Samba server to a Windows95 client or vv,
> the speed varies dramatically. When I try to copy the same (20MB) file 10
> times
> some times it copies in less than 10 seconds. The next time it takes allmost
> a
> minute. And most worrying of all quite often the copying just stops halfway
> in
1999 Aug 18
0
Locking problems with Solaris 2.6 and NFS
Julien Boppert <boppert@hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> we have an Enterprise 450 with Solaris 2.6 and mounted NFS-shares from
> an Sparc 20 (Solaris 2.6 too). On the Enterprise we run Samba 2.0.5a as
> PDC and export the mounted Shares with Samba to our WIN NT 4.0
> Servicepack 3 Clients.
Erk! It's generally a bad idea to import data
via NFS and re-export it via Samba:
2001 Dec 18
0
Synchro prob
[Moved to samba@lists.samba.org]
"quinzin.maxime@libertysurf.fr" wrote:
> I have Samba between Windows and AIX, we've got a
> synchronization prob :
> - An update file on AIX is not immediatly visible in his
> latest version on Windows (98 or NT)
> - The upgrade can reach several minutes
> Is there a solution to force the synchronization
> immediatly (or faster)
1999 Mar 17
1
Printing from NT to UNIX through SAMBA
robert m hazbun wrote:
> We now want to implement printer sharing and
> accounting using samba as well.
You actually wrote to the implementor's list: I've
cc'd this to the regular list...
> We are looking for a solution similar to the Windows 95 Printer$ share that is
> documented on the samba.org site.
I'm almost surprised the existing one didn't work.