similar to: %a substitution broken ????

can we write multiple background in one feature file....? can we write multiple feature in one feature file.....? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

> Le 11/03/2014 10:32, Eric PEYREMORTE a ?crit : > Some news here. I didn't test with 5.01 yet (didn't see that one sorry). > With 5.01 i don't have any problem. Problems begin with 5.10. > -- > Eric PEYREMORTE Hello Eric: To sum up your report: _ 4.0x works; _ 4.10-pre22 (lwip branch) works; _ 5.01 (elflink branch) works; _ 5.10 (lwip merge into elflink) fails; I

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr> wrote: > Le 11/03/2014 15:27, Ady a ?crit : > >>> Le 11/03/2014 10:32, Eric PEYREMORTE a ?crit : >>> Some news here. I didn't test with 5.01 yet (didn't see that one sorry). >>> With 5.01 i don't have any problem. Problems begin with 5.10. >>> --

Le 11/03/2014 00:56, Gene Cumm a ?crit : > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 10 March 2014 18:13,

?Hi,? On 10 March 2014 18:13, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr>wrote: > Ok i give up. I will stick with the old version version (4.07) which works > well with dell 380 and 790. > > I tried to understand what happened between 4.07 and 5 but i don't have > the skill to understand low level c. > > Seems that the memory management changed a lot, maybe

Yes on optiplex 790 i upgraded from A07 to A18 (there was a nic upgrade) but it didn't change anything.. On optiplex 380 i upgraded from bios A01 to A07(don't know if upgrade contained pxe or not)... I tried, lpxelinux.0 and it wasn't faster. Only v4.07 helped on these machines. Tomorrow, i will give a try with 6.03pre2. In wireshark, i saw no errors, the packet length was the

Hi, We only have Dell computers here. We have about 100 optiplex 380. Here is a link to download my wireshark traces : http://dl.free.fr/qgCPEM5Uo In this traces i tested pxelinux and lpxelinux 6.03 on optiplex 740(the one working) and optiplex 380. pxelinux works on both computers but very slowly on 380 as seen in traces. lpxelinux works only on 740. On 380 it seems to enter in a kind of

Le 11/03/2014 17:54, Gene Cumm a ?crit : > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Eric PEYREMORTE > <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr> wrote: >> Le 11/03/2014 15:27, Ady a ?crit : >> >>>> Le 11/03/2014 10:32, Eric PEYREMORTE a ?crit : >>>> Some news here. I didn't test with 5.01 yet (didn't see that one sorry). >>>> With 5.01 i

Hi, I'm coming from courier-imap and i'm trying to migrate to dovecot. I can't find how to create a maildir with a quota file(maildirsize) I saw that if there was a maildirsize it would get its quota from there but can't find how to create that file. I'm using pam auth and would like to set different quotas for each users. With courier-imap there is a useful command :

Notice the same thing happens with optiplex 790 (core i5 sandy bridge). With 790 too everything is ok with pxelinx 4.0.7. I'll post a wireshark later. Le 25/02/2014 17:06, H. Peter Anvin a ?crit : > On 02/25/2014 07:45 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 02/25/2014 07:07 AM, Eric PEYREMORTE wrote: >>> I did some additional tests : >>> >>> On a dell optiplex

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 10 March 2014 18:13, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr>wrote: >> >>> Ok i give up. I will stick with the old version version (4.07) which works

Le 11/03/2014 10:32, Eric PEYREMORTE a ?crit : > Le 11/03/2014 00:56, Gene Cumm a ?crit : >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro >>>> <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote:

I did some additional tests : On a dell optiplex 380, i disabled internal nic, added a 3com 905c tx external pci nic : very slow too. On a dell 740(which is always fast), i put the 3com to be sure : very fast. So it seems it is not related to the nic itself. To be sure it wasn't just one failing computer i tested several 380. I tried disabling several features in bios, like Execute

On 02/25/2014 07:07 AM, Eric PEYREMORTE wrote: > I did some additional tests : > > On a dell optiplex 380, i disabled internal nic, added a 3com 905c tx > external pci nic : very slow too. > On a dell 740(which is always fast), i put the 3com to be sure : very fast. > > So it seems it is not related to the nic itself. To be sure it wasn't > just one failing computer i

Hi there, We had to setup a pxelinux on a new server (windows 2012) and used the latest release of pxelinux 6.0.2. Everything went ok on my first client test machine : dell optiplex 740. Pxe was really fast (vesamenu with large background image was appearing in less than 3 secondes) But on different client machine i got different results : On optiplex 790 (core i5 with intel 82579 nic) and

Hi, I'm running samba 3.0.22 with 2000 and xp clients. Before upgrading to 3.0.22, i had vfs recycle module running like a charm. But since i upgraded, i have several errors "delayed write failure" on every systems 2000 and XP(every 10 seconds), and netscape 7 can't start anymore! In fact, it seems to have a problem with its lock file.So i tried veto oplocks = *.lock but still

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr> wrote: > Hi there, > > We had to setup a pxelinux on a new server (windows 2012) and used the > latest release of pxelinux 6.0.2. > > Everything went ok on my first client test machine : dell optiplex 740. Pxe > was really fast (vesamenu with large background image was appearing in less

Le 26/02/2014 17:06, Eric PEYREMORTE a ?crit : > Hi, > > We only have Dell computers here. We have about 100 optiplex 380. > > Here is a link to download my wireshark traces : > http://dl.free.fr/qgCPEM5Uo > > In this traces i tested pxelinux and lpxelinux 6.03 on optiplex > 740(the one working) > and optiplex 380. > > pxelinux works on both computers but very

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 10 March 2014 18:13, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr>wrote: > >> Ok i give up. I will stick with the old version version (4.07) which works >> well with dell 380 and 790. >> >> I tried to understand what happened between 4.07 and 5 but i

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 10 March 2014 18:13, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr>wrote: