similar to: Prevent ReadOnly DOS attribute from being set

Hi, I'm sure this question has been asked before, but I've searched and can't find a thing. We have Windows 2003 Terminal Servers, and are running Samba 3.4.5 on AIX 6.1. Our Terminal Server Profiles are kept on a samba share. When a user creates a file locally in C:\Documents and Settings(or whatever it's called in english :-) ), sets the file to readonly, and then logs out, the

On 6/21/12 2:23 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi John, > >> Are functions marked as readnone or readonly in the LLVM IR allowed to >> generate output or to exhibit exceptional behavior (e.g., calling >> abort(), generating an MMU fault, etc.)? > they are allowed to unwind exceptions for example, since in theory this > can occur without scrunching externally visible memory

Hi John, > Are functions marked as readnone or readonly in the LLVM IR allowed to > generate output or to exhibit exceptional behavior (e.g., calling > abort(), generating an MMU fault, etc.)? they are allowed to unwind exceptions for example, since in theory this can occur without scrunching externally visible memory (for example unwinding can be done by having functions return an

Dear All, Are functions marked as readnone or readonly in the LLVM IR allowed to generate output or to exhibit exceptional behavior (e.g., calling abort(), generating an MMU fault, etc.)? The SAFECode compiler has a set of run-time checks that pass or fail based solely on the input arguments and, in some cases, global state. They do not modify a program's global state, but they do print

Hello, After an upgrade to samba 3.5.8 (from 3.2.5) the option 'dos filemode' does not seem to work anymore. If I (as a user) do not own the file I can't change permissions. I am user 'felix' and member of supplementary group 'Development'. To test things I use the following share definition: [Temp] path = /srv/samba/file-shares/tmp browseable =

Hi Li, >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: lizf@cn.fujitsu.com >Data: 30/11/2010 8.03 >A: <kreijack@libero.it> >Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org> >Ogg: Re: [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: Add ioctl to set snapshot readonly/writable > >Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: >> Hi Li, >> >> On Monday, 29 November, 2010, Li Zefan wrote: >>> This allows us to set

Hi, I''ve created a custom form builder and overridden text_area so that all fields are readonly. There are a few instances that I would want an editable text_area, so I have tried to create an editable_text_area method. I have tried passing text_area(method, options.merge(:readonly=>false)) to the method, but it doesn''t work: the area is still not editable. Any

I declare some checkboxes : <%= check_box_tag ''offers[]'', offer.id , @params[:offers].include?(offer.id.to_s) ,:readonly=>true %> the result is : <input checked="checked" id="offers[]" name="offers[]" readonly="readonly" type="checkbox" value="1" /> But readonly doesn''t work ??? -- Posted

Hi I am trying to Run AsteriskNow 1.5 which uses Centos 5.3 Distribution with Readonly Root Filesytem. Right now if I shutdown the system abrupty or there is power failure linux kernel doesn't not boot "Kernel panic" and other short of issues.prb due to corrupted files. Thats why i want to make root filesystem as read-only and placing some directories /var and /etc/asterisk etc as

This completes the read only rootfs, all needed writable directories are in the tmpfs. Signed-off-by: Joey Boggs <jboggs at redhat.com> --- common-post.ks | 12 ++++++++++++ ovirt-node-image.ks | 1 + 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/common-post.ks b/common-post.ks index 0c0a3f4..44a0270 100644 --- a/common-post.ks +++ b/common-post.ks @@ -146,3

Hello Is there a way to mount a directory as readonly when using LXC with libvirt? Something like: <filesystem type="mount"> <source dir="/sw/py27/python2.7_x86_64"/> <target dir="/opt//py27"/> <readonly/> </filesystem> The documentation says

hi all, i have problems with windows clients (XP). i want files with readonly flag to not be allowed to delete delete readonly = no ...works with linux clients but on windows you can delete files anyway. i'll be thankful for any hint greetings, rado.

On 08/03/2015 18:07, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Nicholas Chapman > <admin at indigorenderer.com <mailto:admin at indigorenderer.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > I have identified what seems to be a limitation of LLVM with > regard to marking 'sret functions' as pure/readonly. > > For some context - I have

Hi, I've a question about the 'dos filemode' option (samba 3.0.24, debian etch). I want to use this option to allow group members with write access to add/change permissions. man smb.conf: dos filemode (S) only the owner of a file/directory is able to change the permissions on it. However, this behavior is often confusing to DOS/Windows users. Enabling this parameter allows a

Hey all, I was doing some investigation of LICM and I ran into something that seems a bit odd to me. Suppose I was looking at the following code snippet: #define N 1000 int main() { int B[N]; char A[N]; for(int i=0; i<N; i++) { B[i] = strlen(A); } return B[0]+B[N-1]; } Among other optimizations that I may want to happen, I'd hope that the call to strlen could be

Are there any rationalies to make queries obtained by joining scope to be readonly? I read some old posts (pre-rails3) that joins adds additional columns to record so that ActiveRecord doesn''t know how to update that fields, but actually I don''t see that fields. For example I write model class Order < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :executors, class_name:

On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 16:55:08 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Since qemu 2.10, qemu locks all drives even when they are opened > readonly. This disables this locking in this safe case. > > Incomplete fix for > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417306 > --- I guess that, according to the other message in this thread, the commit message will be amended to use

Hi all, I have identified what seems to be a limitation of LLVM with regard to marking 'sret functions' as pure/readonly. For some context - I have some JITed code produced by LLVM, and that code calls back into the host application occasionally. Since my language is purely functional, no functions have side-effects. Therefore I would like to be able to cache the value of identical

Hi Michael, On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Michael Kuperstein <michael.kuperstein at gmail.com> wrote: > This sounds right to me. > > IIUC, historically, readonly and readnone are meant to model the "pure" and > "const" GCC attributes. These attributes make pretty strong guarantees: > > "[a pure] function can be subject to common subexpression

On 01/05/2017 01:20 PM, Sanjoy Das wrote: > Hi Hal, > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> It is still only a function of its arguments, so it can be CSE'd. > That's a good example -- we can CSE it without worrying about the > memory state flowing in. > > In fact, if we have: > > *a =