similar to: Stange printer driver problem

Environment: CentOS 4.2 (RHES4 clone) Ruby 1.8.4 Rails 1.0 I am having a small difficulty with case sensitive matching in some ruby code: f_nam_re = Regexp.new(f_nam_re_s,"x") produces these test results: The passed regexp: ^QPCCCMR[[:digit:]]$ The regexp used is: /^QPCCCMR[[:digit:]]$/i $= is false qpcccmr1 matches QPCCCMR1 matches QPCCMMR1 does not match qpCCCMR1 matches QPCCCMRC

Hi! I''m developing an application with Rails 1.2.6 and I''ve facing a weird problem. In a form, I''m using link_to_function that is aggregating a :partial, the code is as follows: <table> <thead> <tr> <th>Marca</th> <th>Porcentaje</th> <th>Objetivo Mensual</th>

Hi I am having strange problem using samba share using Linux file managers like nautilus and konquers. I can successfully mount samba share using smb://mnt/c but every time it asks for password. When I click on one folder and come back it again asks for password and that is very annoying. Pls help me Komal

Hi all, I have a SPA 1001 with DTMF set to auto. A sip.conf peer with codec alaw, ulaw, g729. I have dtmf=inband as this peer was only supporting alaw/ulaw. They just add g729, it's a GW to landline phones. A call passing through this peer give me "WARNING Inband not supported with g729, use RFC2833 instead". The call is connecting and DTMF is working. Now I'm coming back

Greetings, CentOS. After up2dating one of the corporate mail servers to CentOS 4.4 (was CentOS 4.2) and upgrading kernel to kernel-smp-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL, the following kernel messages started to appear in syslog: [root at gamma ~]# dmesg ........... ...CUT..... ........... lockd: unexpected unlock status: 1 lockd: unexpected unlock status: 1 lockd: unexpected unlock status: 1 lockd: unexpected

I posted a rather lengthy message a few weeks ago. Andrew B and Jerry both responded with indications of furthers investigation required....i was wondering if anyone found anything strange because I've had to go back to 2.2.5 to support those clients and with a bit of fear of potential strange behaviour in my XP clients. Don't wish to be a pest, but you guys have done so much for our

Tom Blackwell wrote: >... >I summarized this to myself as "computed subscripts need explicit >rounding in R, but not in S". Here's the sample code which gave >me different results with R than with Splus. I no longer have >Splus available, so I can't check it again. >look <- (10 * seq(14)) - 76 >chk.1 <- seq(1420)[ 10 * (73.1 + look) ] #

Does anyone know what the following error means, and what I can do to fix it?? [root@trouble openldap]# ldapadd -D "cn=root,o=smb,dc=picotech,dc=net" -W Enter LDAP Password: ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: No such attribute ------------- Jeffrey D. Means CIO for PicoTech Ft. Collins, Colorado -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hi there, I'm having an odd problem where this NIC (cheap-o, yes I know) doesn't seem to work on FreeBSD correctly. I have the same cards (even revision models) in two win boxen and they work fine. 10baseT works but not 100baseT. With a normal NIC config, without explicitly setting the media to 10baseT, it will autosense as 100BaseT @ full-duplex, showing active. However I can't

I haven't been able to find any information about this problem, I hope someone can help, anyway this is the setup: Server: - Linux Fedora Core 5 - kernel 2.6.17-1.2145_FC5smp - openssh-server-4.3p2-4 Client not working: - Linux Fedora Core 5 - kernel 2.6.17-1.2145_FC5smp - openssh-clients-4.3p2-4 Client working: - Same machine - Windows XP - putty 0.58 This is the log from the non working

Anyone else seen this eth-device and what brings it up? [root at oh1mrr etc]# ifconfig __tmp1192348344 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:AB:DD:2E:D1 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2094689 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1645734 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX

On Oct 7, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On 7 October 2014 10:50, Dmitry Borisenkov <d.borisenkov at samsung.com> wrote: >> fpfail.s:26: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `ret' >> >> I downloaded Intel manual and haven’t found any mention of retl instruction, > > "retl" is the

Hello everyone. I'm not an expert neither in llvm nor in x86 nor in IEEE standard for floating point numbers, thus any of my following assumptions maybe wrong. If so, I will be grateful if you clarify me what's goes wrong. But if my guesses are correct we possibly have a bug in fp arithmetics on x86. I have the following ir: @g = constant i64 1 define i32 @main() { %gval = load

Hello, i have a simple but annoying problem. I have the following entry in /etc/asterisk/externsions.conf file: ---<Cut Here>--- exten => 10100,1,Wait(4) exten => 10100,2,Playback(transfer,noanswer) exten => 10100,3,Dial(${PHONE30},30,t) exten => 10100,4,Background(extension) exten => 10100,5,Background(is-curntly-unavail) exten => 10100,6,Voicemail(9999) exten =>

Ok, guys... Please be gentle with me. I have what is going to be the strangest question you will have ever heard, but I have no idea what to tell this person. I set up Asterisk 3 or 4 weeks ago, everything is running smooth. My receptionist has told me on two different occasions that she tried to transfer a call by pressing "#", and she heard a buzz noise in the phone and the