similar to: wins vs. browsing, and documentation

I'm having some problems with (I think) WINS here and am hoping for some pointers to tools that will help me track down what's going on. Really, I'd like to be able to get a big dump of all of the names registered on a WINS server. (The WINS server in question is a NT box to which I don't have direct access. Ideally, I'd like to be able to see a nmblookup-style dump showing

My network looks like this: internet 192.168.0.0/24 router ----+----+----+----- internal 192.168.5.0/24 | | | router ----+-----+------+- LNB--->mswin | | (also a | | | client | | samba | | .... | | server) | | samba | | samba

We are experiencing lots of WAN-wide browsing problems, mainly because Local Master Browsers are turned off etc. I got this idea: When clients register their names with the WINS-server (nmbd), why not add that name to the Domain Master Browsers (the same nmbd) browselist? This would make it unneccessary to deal with LMBs. Is this possible to implement? /Peter ?strand

My network looks like this: internet 192.168.0.0/24 router ----+----+----+----- internal 192.168.5.0/24 | | | router ----+-----+------+- LNB--->mswin | | (also a | | | client | | samba | | .... | | server) | | samba | | samba

I'm having a weird problem which I think may be a bug, but I'm not sure, so I think I'll describe it and see if it rings a bell with anyone. Basically, the story is this: there's a file owned by a Unix user "lshaw" (i.e. me) and whose group ownership is "engineer". Now, I open this file on one Windows XP computer, then go try and open it again on another XP

Hey everyone, I'm preparing for a transition in which I'll be moving everything (PDC, WINS server, big file shares) off an old Linux server running Samba 2.2.7 onto a much newer Linux system running Samba 3.0.22. In the process, I'll be switching from smbpasswd (only thing supported under Samba 2.x, if I understand correctly) to ldapsam on Samba 3.x. I want to keep the same domain

Referencing: http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/network_administration_guides/samba_reference_guide/17_NetworkBrowsing_34.html I've got two subnets (192.168.2.1 and 192.168.1.1). All the machines on both subnets are running XP Home or Pro and are all part of the same workgroup (WORKGROUP). I've added an OpenSUSE box on x.x.2.1 and have set it as the WINS server with a very simple

> > > Referencing: > http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/network_administration_guides/samba_reference_guide/17_NetworkBrowsing_34.html > > I've got two subnets (192.168.2.1 and 192.168.1.1). All the machines > on both subnets are running XP Home or Pro and are all part of the > same workgroup (WORKGROUP). > > I've added an OpenSUSE box on x.x.2.1 and

@lbutlr wrote: > On 19 Oct 2020, at 20:31, Victor Sudakov <vas at sibptus.ru> wrote: > > I have seen this but I do not want this information in a database. > ? > > > Even a local sqlite database would do. > > What? > This meant that an external DMBS/daemon process (MySQL, Redis etc) was not desirable, but any on-disk format Dovecot can save the data in was

Hi, everybody: Forgive me for bringing this to you. We normally use Samba servers but are dealing with a situation involving two Windows 2003 servers and browsing, and the truth is, I can't think of a better forum to bring questions about browsing. We have the following situation: Domain controller is a Windows 2000 machine at 192.168.0.100 The backup domain controller is a Windows 2003

Yes, it sounds good. I can try tomorrow. Thank you for your advice ! On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Logan Chien <tzuhsiang.chien at gmail.com>wrote: > I think the better solution should be: > > > LLVMContext& C = is->getContext(); > Value *values[] = { > ConstantInt::getSigned(Type::getInt64Ty(C), *scsr*), > MDString::get(C, *"path"*) > };

Hi Chandrakala, Logan, Can you confirm that the attached patch fixes the overflow problem? Koen, can you confirm the fix makes sense? Cheers, Jean-Marc On 11/27/2017 12:10 PM, Logan Stromberg wrote: > Sorry, long holiday weekend in America. > I can say with pretty high certainty that there is an overflow occurring > and it is flipping smooth_coef_Q16 to be negative when it probably

Sorry, long holiday weekend in America. I can say with pretty high certainty that there is an overflow occurring and it is flipping smooth_coef_Q16 to be negative when it probably shouldn't be. I had originally thought it was only an issue where it was overflowing the 15th bit but not the 16th, which might still preserve the intended value for operations that ignore the sign bit (in cases

Hello everyone, In my new Samba environment, I have a few servers that use LDAP for Unix accounts (via PADL's NSS stuff). This is working fine for Unix accounts, and everything is in LDAP. These servers are also going to run Samba, with the ldapsam backend. I've noticed that ldapsam allows me to maintain a UID<->SID mapping by simply putting the SID in the sambaSID attribute for

Yes, yes, I can reproduce it now, but only on platforms that define a 16-bit int by default (SA_Q15 is an opus_int rather than opus_int32). What system are you compiling this for? On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Chandrakala Madhira < chandrakala.madhira at soctronics.com> wrote: > Hi Logan, > > Please find attached the input stream we are using testing. > > Thank you, >

I have a network with several WORKGROUPS(lets call them X,Y and Z) in it and a samba server which is in one of the WORKGROUPS(X). I have enabled WINS support in samba and all client machines has WINS server IP configured that points to the samba server. Problem: When a browsning the network from a client I can only see a some nodes(or none at all) in WORKGROUPS Y and Z. Usally it takes 10-20

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I've uploaded the *final* 3.0.23c roll up patch to http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz. I've already cut the 3.0.23c tarballs so unless there is a major problem, this will be the final change set. Please report *any* bugs that you find. I'd like to wrap this one up and do the public 3.0.23c

I think the better solution should be: LLVMContext& C = is->getContext(); Value *values[] = { ConstantInt::getSigned(Type::getInt64Ty(C), *scsr*), MDString::get(C, *"path"*) }; lnstr.setMetadata(*"your_analysis_name"*, MDNode::get(C, values)); So that you can take advantage of the type system of LLVM bitcode, and don't have to cast the integers from/to strings

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:12 PM Logan Gunthorpe <logang at deltatee.com> wrote: > > > > On 2019-06-13 3:43 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Passing the actual typed structure leads to more understandable code > > vs the actual references. > > Ha, ok, I originally suggested this to Dan when he introduced the > callback[1]. > > Reviewed-by: Logan

The problem is that I want to pass only srsr which is an int. "marked" was just an example :) Thanks you! On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Logan Chien <tzuhsiang.chien at gmail.com>wrote: > I'm not familiar with this, but maybe you can try: > > StringRef tst = ("marked" + Twine(srsr)).str(); > > It seems that you can't use integer as meta data