similar to: Can samba hide symlinks?

hi, on a samba domain member file server i'm using dfs root shares with multiple msdfs symlinks pointing to other shares (on the same server), which works fine. These linked shares have different access rights, therefore a user might have access to one linked share but not to another. Is there any option to hide msdfs-symlinks to shares that a user cannot read? (the same as 'hide

On 16-04-2024 16:21, Konrad Jacobi via samba wrote: > hi, > on a samba domain member file server i'm using dfs root shares with > multiple msdfs symlinks pointing to other shares (on the same server), > which works fine. These linked shares have different access rights, > therefore a user might have access to one linked share but not to > another. > Another option is

Matthew Schumacher wrote: > List, > > I think I found a bug here because I can repeatably get the same kernel > (checked with md5sum) to decompress and to fail with the error: > > invalid compressed format (err=2) > > --System halted > > > Here is how I can reproduce the problem: > > Boot 2.6.8-rc1 > Run md5sum on 2.6.8-rc1 kernel >

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > > There was no court case, but VERITAS published a modifed version of gtar where > additional code was added by binary only libraries from VERITAS. The FSF did > never try to discuss this is public even though everybody did

Hello List, Seems like blockcopy --wait doesn't work work qemu-2.2.x. I found someone else having the same problem, but it never went anywhere: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-January/msg00045.html I went ahead and did some more debugging and created a bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210903 I'm going to do some more debugging and hopefully

Good day, gang, Chris McKeever was kind enough to write back to me over the weekend regarding the problems I'd experienced in using Backup Exec 8.x and 9.x to connect to Samba shares on a NetBSD system. Between his comments and my direct experience, I've only found ONE combination that will work, and that is: NetBSD 1.6, Samba 2.2.8a, and Backup Exec 8.6. If you take NetBSD up to 1.6.1,

Hi all, How to dtrace a who is writing a veritas volume? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20070412/dfd8c254/attachment.html>

I'm having particular issues running Veritas in my Windows environment. The agent just seems to baulk on some servers. I've looked into backup solutions running on Linux before but there doesn't seem to be much. Is anyone familiar with something that has Windows agents and yet managed by Linux? <<JAV>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

> On Friday 10 April 2015 13:07:38 Matthew Schumacher wrote: >> Hello List, >> >> Seems like blockcopy --wait doesn't work work qemu-2.2.x. >> >> I found someone else having the same problem, but it never went anywhere: >> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2015-January/msg00045.html >> >> I went ahead and did some more

We have some HDS storage that isn''t supported by mpxio, so we have to use veritas dmp to get multipathing. Whats the recommended way to use DMP storage with ZFS. I want to use DMP but get at the multipathed virtual luns at as low a level as possible to avoid using vxvm as much as possible. I figure theres no point in having overhead from 2 volume manages if we can avoid it. Has anyone

This mail message follows from several discussions with Luke Leighton. It's mostly technical in nature but I'm submitting to all mailing lists anyway (Luke's suggestion). We have our Samba server running with the Berkeley AMD automounter (nothing peculiar here). In order for our Samba users to walk the automount tree, we created a program to create symbolic links from the local

What are the users here opinions on enteriprise grade opensource software for doing backups, as an alternative to bakbone or veritas. We just have basic requirements, i.e backing up nfs servers. --

I thought this had been fixed with newer kernels? We have an old Maxtor Snap Server, an 80 GB NAS unit, containing some of our archives. Both of our CentOS servers have it permanently mounted by NFS for convenient access. This weekend, I discovered remotely that, although all systems except the VRTSralus remote agents for Veritas (now Symantec) Backup Exec were working just fine, both servers

I am getting a bad username or password error when I try to logon to the domain from a windows 2000 server. I can't find anything wrong with my config and I'm using a root user that is in the directory with the uid and gid set to 0. The only thing I see in the logs is something about incorrect password length, but I checked that my passwords are encrypted and I can access shares as

Hi. If I create a zpool with the following command: zpool create tank raidz2 da0 da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6 da7 and after a reboot the device names for some reason are changed so da2 and da5 are swapped, either by altering the LUN setting on the storage or by switching cables/swapping disks etc.? How will zfs handle that? Will it simply acknowledge that all devices are present and the pool is

I searched around but didn't find an answer to my question, hopefully someone here knows how to fix this problem. The issue is actually pretty simple, if I use "security = user" and add a user with smbpasswd then I can connect to the share from windows 2003 server. However, if I set "security = server" then define the same windows 2003 server as the password server then I

Fellow Samba-shakers, I've run into an odd problem, and I'm seeking the advice of anyone who has implemented Veritas Backup Exec 8.6 or 9.0, on an NT 4.0 server platform, to perform backups of NetBSD 1.6x systems via Samba file shares. Said problem did NOT manifest itself until I tried using Samba 3.0.0. I have jumped back to 2.2.8a, since that's the last version that was known to

Here is what I have configured: T2000 with OBP 4.28.6 2008/05/23 12:07 with 2 - 72 GB disks as the root disks OpenSolaris Nevada Build 91 Solaris Express Community Edition snv_91 SPARC Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 03 June 2008

> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:49:12PM -0400, Matt Miller wrote: >> I have seen this error in many postings, but the solutions seem not to >> apply in this case. This error happens during a small file transfer >> (gif image) and after 75% of a 165G rsync job (the building file list >> portion is complete.) Most solutions I saw were related to not having >>

Hi again, I have been testing and reading up on other solutions and just wanted to check if my ideas are ok. I have been looking at dispersed volumes and wonder if there are any problems running replicated-distributed cluster on the master node and a dispersed-distributed cluster on the slave side of a geo-replication. Second thought, running disperesed on both sides, is that a problem (Master: