similar to: Samba authentication fails

Hello, I would like to put 1 asterisk box in Country A and 1 asterisk box in Country B. Let's assume : - Asterisk box in country A = GWA - Asterisk box in country B = GWB - Calling party number (located in country A) = CgPNA - Called party number (located in country B) = CdPNB - Second Called party number (located in country B) = sCdPNB - PSTN in country A = PSTNA - PSTN in country B = PSTNB

Hi everyone. I'm wondering whether a setup like the one described below would be possible with Tinc: nodeA1 nodeB3 | | (Network A) --- [GWA] --- (Internet) --- [GWB] --- (Network B) | | nodeA2

I have installed Samba 2.0.4b on AIX 4.3.1 but cannot get it to authenticate Windows clients. The error that I get is 'The password is incorrect'. However when I use smbclient on the AIX box to connect to the shared resource it connects no problem. The only way that I can get a Windows client to connect is by putting the server into share mode and setting the share as guest allowable.

Hi all, I am using a redhat 8.x linux box configured with zebra routing software which is also configured with ospfd I have 2 backbone routers running ospf connected to different isp''s I have 3 local routers also running ospf within themselfs and also with the 2 backbone routers (all are linux boxes) router A - backbone router 1 router B - backbone router 2 router C - local router 1

I would really appreciate some help with changing a link_to_remote call to a button of some sort. Here''s a little background. On the page there are two <div>s. One is a form that lets the visitor enter items. The second <div> is where the entered items get displayed, each in it''s own item <div>. Each item <div> has two <span>s. The first one

I un-commented the following in my environments.rb file config.plugins = [ :all, :exception_notification, :ssl_requirement] but I get the following errors: in `ensure_all_registered_plugins_are_loaded!'': Could not locate the following plugins: exception_notification and ssl_requirement (LoadError) from /Users/mitch/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.2/lib/rails/plugin/loader.rb:44:in

Hi, I have a client connected to the ''net through 3 ISP''s. Have set up a Linux box to do routing and load sharing for the 3 connections. A fourth interface is connected to the LAN with private IP addresses. Am using iptables to SNAT traffic to the appropriate IP depending on the interface the packet gets routed onto. The setup looks something like this: Interface IP

Hi all, After all these years, I am finally porting some R-2.3.1-based S4 object code to R-2.6.1, dealing with all the S4 object system changes that came in R-2.4.0. I've run across what appears to be some sort of ommission in the implementation of callNextMethod() when used with primitives having group generic methods. In a stock R-2.6.1 patched (happens to be running on AMD64/RHEL 4, but

Hi Who concern, I setup TINC VPN follow these. 192.168.1.x / 24 (Client groups) | 192.168.1.1 (eth1) (GW1) 202.44.34.206 (eth0) || Internet || 202.44.45.14 (eth0) (GW2) 192.168.2.1 (eth1)

Not at this stage -- no. On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:23 PM Zhaoshi Zheng <zhaoshiz at quicinc.com> wrote: > Mitch, > > > > I forgot to ask: do you have any timeline on sharing it through > Phabricator? > > > > Thanks, > > Zhaoshi > > > > *From:* llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> *On Behalf Of *Zhaoshi > Zheng via llvm-dev

GREAT NEWS ARE Hitting ON FR IDAY FOR CRSVF!!! DON'T miss THIS INVESTMENT MOMENT, PLACE {CRSVF} ON THE RADA`R!!! Tra de Al er t: FRIDAY, October 06, 2006 "Symb0l": CRSVF.OB Current Pri ce : $0.15 Pr evClose : $0.18 Rec ommendation: ST RON G-B UY WATCH THIS STO CK GO HIGHER AND HIGHER DON'T MI SS THIS INVE STM ENT MOMENT, PLACE CRSVF ON THE PORT FO LIO!!! About

GREAT NEWS ARE Hitting ON FR IDAY FOR CRSVF!!! DON'T miss THIS INVESTMENT MOMENT, PLACE {CRSVF} ON THE RADA`R!!! Tra de Al er t: FRIDAY, October 06, 2006 "Symb0l": CRSVF.OB Current Pri ce : $0.15 Pr evClose : $0.18 Rec ommendation: ST RON G-B UY WATCH THIS STO CK GO HIGHER AND HIGHER DON'T MI SS THIS INVE STM ENT MOMENT, PLACE CRSVF ON THE PORT FO LIO!!! About

On 8/24/06, Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck at gmail.com> wrote: > Here is one more solution . It uses the reshape package. > Its faster than using reshape but not as fast as xtabs; > however, it is quite simple -- just one line and if that > matters it might be useful: > > library(reshape) > system.time(w4 <- cast(melt(DF, id = 1:2), Y ~ X, head, n = 1)) > >

I have been assigned a task of building a front end to a database that has already been created. All the database tables have the naming convention of lclclcClclclc. For example; tblComputerNames. How do i get around this in rails since it likes lower case table names to keep with its naming conventions for classes and objects? Mitch Mitch Raful MCSE, CCNP Network Engineer MCCS Quantico

Yeah, I was just puzzled :D No worries. Cheers, Sebastian 2014-12-16 11:09 GMT+01:00 Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>: > It looks like I missed that email completely, I started out replying to > Nikola and Hans which is why I was talking about Windows rather than OS X. > > > > I've just found your first email in my llvmdev folder and I think I see what

It looks like I missed that email completely, I started out replying to Nikola and Hans which is why I was talking about Windows rather than OS X. I've just found your first email in my llvmdev folder and I think I see what happened. My mail rules deliver llvmdev messages to a folder named llvmdev unless I'm directly addressed in which case it delivers to my inbox. It looks like you

So I''ve found the issue... But I don''t yet understand the issue. If anyone has any ideas feel free to share. To keep a long story short (cause it took days and I don''t want to bore anyone...) I ended up going through a process of a/b testing narrowing down the conditions that reproduced the failed install. Nearing the end I found that it was only happening on equipment

Firewall users, My apologies as I''m not on this list, so please respond directly as well as to the list. I did try to search the archives and didn''t find any hits, although the search did not like searching for terms with underscores in them (both clear_firewall and ip_forward). I was trying to understand why, when running shorewall stop, even though it echoes IP

LLVM 3.4.2 is now available! Download it now, or read the release notes. This release contains bug-fixes for the 3.4.1 release and is both API and ABI compatible with 3.4. A few changes of note are: - Build fix with gcc 4.9 - libLLVM.so soname fix LLVM 3.4.2 would not be possible without the help of our volunteer release team! Thanks to all the release testers: Renato Golin, Hans Wennborg,

In support of the recently added capability to remount with lzo compression, provide a helper function to check the compression INCOMPAT flags when remounting with lzo compression, and set the flags if necessary. Also, implement the new helper function when defragmenting with explicit lzo compression and when setting the default subvolume. Signed-off-by: Mitch Harder