similar to: Maximum samba file transfer speed on gigabit...

>Oplock's tells the Windows Client he can cache the requestet file on >local machine. >Should the Client change the File (or another Client would do this) the >Lock must released by the first Client, or Samba break's the Lock after >a certain time he doesn't become the Lock back. > >When you take the Settings in your Share Section with the Database File, >then

I'm using Samba & smbfs to make directories on a Linux file server available across a switched Gigabit network. Unfortunately, when mounting the shares to another Linux system with smbfs, the performance is terrible. To test the setup, I created both a 100mb and 650mb file and transferred them with ftp, smbclient, and smbfs (mounted share). I also used iperf to send each file, just out of

Hello, I am new in this group. Please give me a short hint, in case this is the wrong place for my posting. I want to create an XML file and store it in "filetransfer". The XML part of the file (the body) sould go to "filetransfer.data". Despite the last line, everything is fine with the code below. With "filetransfer.save" two entries "<clone/>"

Most manufacturers charge in excess of $80 to upgrade from a 10/100 switch to a 10/100/1000 switch built into the phone. The cost might have been in the chipset 5 years ago but I can get a 5 port gigabit switch for $30. What are most folks using for people that need gigabit to the desktop and don't want to run another cable? -Matt

Hi everyone, I am seeing slower-than-expected performance in Gluster 3.2.3 between 4 hosts with 10 gigabit eth between them all. Each host has 4x 300GB SAS 15K drives in RAID10, 6-core Xeon E5645 @ 2.40GHz and 24GB RAM running Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit (I have also tested with Scientific Linux 6.1 and Debian Squeeze - same results on those as well). All of the hosts mount the volume using the FUSE

I have spent much of the day today researching performance tuning with samba. I have tried everything that I can find out about how to make performance faster. I checked disk performance with Bonnie, installed FTP and tested a transfer that way, achieving 6-7 MB / second. about 30 seconds for 150 MB file. I was finally able to achieve those speeds on a file transfer to the server through

??Hi all! We use Samba 3 server for some video stuff (editing, rendering, and so on) -- that's why performance is critical. We've tried a lot smb.conf options, but Samba can't satisfy our requirements. Our server configuration is as following: * Hard drive: RAID5 (8 x Seagate 7200.10), 3ware 9550SX-8LP controller * NICs (trunked): 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5704 * Processor: Opteron

Hello, First of all, I already contacted Martin Devera, the developer of HTB, and he told me to search for help on this mailinglist, thus I am describing my problems here now... I am kind of seriously annoyed by QoS as I have been trying for over 3 years to get it working properly - first I did not understand how it works, then it seemed not to work, then it was working perfectly for half a

Hello, and Happy News Year from France J Since 4 month I'm trying to configure Samba 3 on an Ubuntu server 10 to replace a W2k server. The client software is used over Windows XP vista and seven. This software use smb for a flat file (.dbf) share for 9 users the new server is more powerful the old one but I think that the Oplocks options are causing high latencies in the request.

Hi, could someone please give me the correct entries for using Foxpro with a samba share. I tried everything I can think of in the smb.conf but I am always confronted with locking problems and multiuser issues: Upgraded to version 2.2.5 smb.conf (among other things of course) oplocks=off lock spin count = 3 lock spin time = 25 locking=yes Is there anything you can tell me. It is very urgent and

hi list, i have a little problem with 2-node RAC using OCFS. the application running on this cluster does heavily index-based accesses. the data volumes are SAN volumes connected by fibrechannel. the throughput does not exceed 10mb/s, average is 7-8 mb/s. i've used 'iostat -x' and got rkB/s=8000 while %util=100% (device was saturated) from kernel's POV. i did some

I'm trying to run Samba on a gigabit network. On the server side I've got Samba 2.2.1 running on an sgi Origin200 with a gigabit ethernet card plugged into a gigabit switch, and the files are being served off a fibrechannel raid array. On the client side I have a windows 2k box with a gigabit card plugged into the same switch. Both machines and the switch claim that everything is

Hi ! I have an unique situation. An SCO Unixware 7.1.3 with Samba 2.2.7a (yes, i know; it sucks !) On the machine, is running MS Foxpro 2.6 for UNIX (it's running pretty well for several years) but due to new demands (like Crystal Reports, Visual view; etc) the directories with DBF files were shared using Samba. At the beginning, when everything was only about reading, there were no

Hi, I have run into the following I bonded 6 NICs on my Cent OS server into a 600MB pipe. I use bond method 4 = dynamic Link aggregation. My Cysco Switch supports this apparently. However I only get increased bandwidth from my MAC by connecting via AFP. However when I connect via SMB I don't. I was told to change the sockect options to the following on my smb.conf file on my fileserver:

I have a file Server CentOS 5.10, its on the internet, so I compress all csv into one file using (tar -czvf compressed_files.tar.gz *.csv) on this server so that I can download them as one compressed file to save bandwidth, Disk space on this server available is 50Gig, so when I copy the files onto Redhat EL 5.9 and decompress them using (tar -zxvf *.gz) It decompresses maybe 80% then get error:

Full_Name: Bonnie Version: 1.6.1 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (160.129.25.106) glm() seems to converge, even when it shouldn't. I am trying to fit a model where $converge=FALSE and I am fitting models that do not converge in SAS, but they seem to converge in R ... Thank you.

Hello list First of all: Good work and thanks for GlusterFS! I'm totally new to GlusterFS, but i like it a lot and think about migrating my NFS setup completely to GlusterFS. But i ran into some problems with my chosen structure. Hopefully someone can help out. The first questions: i ran into some performance issues with a certain structure/setup and like to know (before i continue testing)

I'm just wondering what folks are using to benchmark/tune large arrays these days. I've always used bonnie with file sizes 2-3 times physical RAM. Maybe there's a better way? Cheers,

I am currently running rsync 2.5.6 on solaris 8. I am updating a rather large directory tree including some ISAM databases and am having some performance problems. We are using gigabit interfaces between two V280R servers and I am trying to push the tree with the following options. usr/local/bin/rsync --quiet --recursive --times --perms --links --delete-excluded

Hi There, i think all VOIP clients for Linux are unusable! i got testet: Linphone + Linphonec all in version 12.2 Kphone gophone and other... the only programm that is usable is gnomemeeting... does anybody knew some other tools? Best Regards, Mark