similar to: Setting read/write file access on cifs mounted file system

Hai, What happens if you add to the mount the option -mSMB2 If that does not work, tell the exact running OS, RH (NR) , Centos (NR) And samba version. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Krishna G via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 13 februari 2019 15:41 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >

I'm currently struggeling with a cifs mount from a windows 2003 server. The share can be mounted with mount.cifs, but despite using the rw mount option, the mountpoint can only be accessed read-only. Trying to write on the share results in a permission denied error. This happens on a 2.4.21 kernel with the shipped CIFS kernel module. The mount command used is: mount.cifs

Hi all, I am testing different setups for Samba home share mounts via the CIFS protocol on Linux clients with and without Keberos security (both krb5 and krb5i). I am experiencing some strange behaviour in case of Kerberos authentication: In case of mounts (by root or the user itself) without Kerberos security (only NTLMv2 authentication), local root and the owning user on the Linux client

Hi, We are facing difficulties writing to Alternate Data Streams (ADS) on a Windows CIFS mount on CentOS/RHEL Linux. Steps followed on both machine: -------------------------------------------- On RHEL(cifs.ko version: 1.68) 1. Created sample.txt file using vim with come content inside the Windows CIFS share mounted on linux. 2. Then wrote some content with “vim

Hello, I've been having a problem copying files from a Samba directory, mounted by cifs so that it's accessible from a Linux machine. The autofs service is used to mount the Samba directory on /samba/public/name with mount options "-fstype=cifs,guest,file_mode=0664,dir_mode=0775". If I do this: touch /samba/public/name/foo # create an empty file cp

I've tried some internet and list searching, but I haven't been able to find anybody with the same issue. It's hard to search for "samba cifs force user problem" because it hits nearly every samba tech support question ever asked. The smbfs kernel module disappeared from the stock fedora kernels recently *crycry* Now my shares that were mounted via smbfs have to be mounted

Hi list, we have a file server on which Win2k3 (EE) is installed. I can mount my home drive from a linux machine (gentoo with samba-3.0.2a-r2 installed) with my windows account data and mount.cifs. Then I can read files or navigate through the dirs. But if I try to write a file I get "permission denied". If I do the same thing as Administrator no error occurs. Well, one could say

I have the same problem as described below for a while. samba 3.0.23c-2 under Fedora 6 clients Win XP and Fedora 6 app. OpenOffice 2.1 / 2.0.4 will there be any progress ? thanx -- Kristian Lauritsen Laser Product Manager PicoQuant GmbH phone: +49 30 6392 6563 http://www.picoquant.com On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:41:04AM +0000, Phill Gillespie wrote: > Hi... > > I've been

Hello world; currently I am running into some strange problem with a setup that incorporates servers running Windows 2003 and Debian GNU stable (samba 3.0.14). Here's the situation: * There's a share on the windows box that the unix machines need to access. This is mounted using CIFS with uid= / oid= options to ensure the desired unix user account is able to access the data in the share.

Hi everyone I have these shares in smb.conf: [home2] path = /home2 read only = No [home] path = /home2/home read only = No I mount [home] on a Linux client like this: mount -t cifs //hh1/home2 /home2 -osec=krb5,rw,multiuser Here is the output of the mount command: //hh1/home2 on /home2 type cifs

Hello Gordon, Thursday, December 11, 2014, 5:23:56 PM, you wrote: GM> The system will mount a GM> filesytem on top of an existing path, including one with another GM> filesystem at the same path. But the mounts are identical- \\\\10.0.0.253\\niamh on /NSA320-music type cifs (rw) \\\\10.0.0.253\\niamh on /NSA320-music type cifs (rw) \\\\10.0.0.253\\niamh on /NSA320-music type cifs

On 22/01/15 12:57, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: > Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share >>> via cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu 14.04 (but I also >>> tried it with Gentoo and samba 4.1.14). So

I've got a share from a Unisys MCP Mainframe mounted with mount.cifs from RHEL 6.1 (samba-common-3.5.6-86.el6.x86_64). when I try to touch a file, it creates the file, but reports an error - "setting times of `testfile.txt': Permission denied" strace on the touch command shows that it is erroring out on the utimensat() call utimensat(0, NULL, NULL, 0) = -1 EACCES (Permission

I have a Samba 3.0.23a-1.fc5.1 configured on a Fedora 5 server. It's joined to an Active Directory 2003 domain controller using Winbind, etc. I'm able to connect from various workstations using active directory user accounts/credentials just fine to shares on this server, permissions work, and all is well. I'm guessing this is set up correctly. However, from another Fedora 5 server,

On 23/01/15 07:34, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: > > Am 22.01.2015 um 17:17 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> On 22/01/15 12:57, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>> Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>>> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I

OR is there any way, or magical hidden parmeter in the smb.conf that allows to enumerate the users in the Domain Users? tbh this has a huge impact on the file share server as many directorys have "domain users" as group ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Mario Pio Russo, System Admin SWG IT Services Dublin, Phone & FAX: +353

On 15/07/15 11:06, Mario Pio Russo wrote: > I have some more findings about this > > it looks like getent does not get the right information from the Domain > Controller, in fact the domain user groups shows with NO member users: > > getent group | grep "domain users" > domain users:x:10000: > root at seadog:~# > > > Now funny thing is that other folders

>The smbfs kernel module disappeared from the stock fedora kernels >recently *crycry* Now my shares that were mounted via smbfs have to be >mounted via cifs. cifs is, apparantly, not a drop-in replacement for >smbfs however, as it behaves differnetly with the same configuration >options. Indeed, it does seem to be backwards in compatability as apposed to backwards compatable.

Am 22.01.2015 um 13:14 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 22/01/15 11:52, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >> Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share >>>> via cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu

First: this is my first post on this list so any suggestions, let me know. I recently had to make the move from SMBFS to CIFS when I upgraded from Fedora 4 to 5. Changing settings in my /etc/fstab was easy and no errors come up but now I'm having an issue very similar to post I found on your list that got no response back in April: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-April/119813.html