similar to: sigbus fault ?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "sigbus fault ?"

2006 May 28
1
sigbus fault?
Hi Folks, I'm trying to run samba on Solaris 9. It works OK when I don't compile in kerberos and ldap, but when with those two compiled in, smbd seems to freeze (nmbd and winbindd are OK). After a bit of investigation I notice something strange in truss: ... /1@1: -> libldap-2.3:ldap_free_urldesc(0x30dfe8, 0x32e048, 0x32dfb8, 0x3 /1@1: ->
2006 Oct 31
0
6312173 The libsldap function __ns_ldap_list() returns invaild DN string when using attributMap
Author: sdussud Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: da727245bf8a0e3cdabe620c5abcf05e3f55e70a Log message: 6312173 The libsldap function __ns_ldap_list() returns invaild DN string when using attributMap Files: update: usr/src/lib/libsldap/common/ns_reads.c update: usr/src/lib/libsldap/common/ns_sldap.h
2004 Jan 07
1
openssh 3.7.1p2 fault on solaris 9 for sparc when built as 64-bit
I built OpenSSH as a 64-bit binary on Solaris 9, using gcc 3.3.2, OpenSSL 0.9.7c and zlib 1.2.1. sshd starts up normally, and will begin the login session, however, some time after it reads /etc/default/login, it faults and kills the connection. There are no error messages logged to syslog (with LogLevel set to DEBUG) or with the -ddd option. Here's a truss of the failure: 8132:
2003 Sep 25
2
sshd (openssh 3.7.1p1) dies during login on Solaris 8 system with SRM installed
I have compiled ssh 3.7.1p1 using gcc and am trying to get it to run on our Solaris 8 systems running Sun's SRM system. With existing users it is fine, but with a new user, the user can not ssh in on the first login, they get the message from SRM that no lnode has been created. I put sshd in debug and found that it SEG's here: debug3: mm_sshpam_free_ctx: waiting for
2009 Apr 06
0
conflict name of si_code on NetBSD
Hi. I compiled 1.2.rc2 on NetBSD. [toyota at sernpidal]% uname -rsm NetBSD 3.1 i386 [toyota at sernpidal]% ./configure; make --- snip --- gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -MT child-wait.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/child-wait.Tpo -c -o child-wait.o child-wait.c In
2013 Apr 05
2
Problem with fts lucene, on solaris 10
Hi all, I'm planning to migrate my courier-imap imap server to dovecot, but I'm experiencing a strange issue with fts-lucene plugin. Basically, every time I start a search, the log starts to write: Apr 05 19:30:53 indexer: Error: Indexer worker disconnected, discarding 1 requests for XXXXXX Apr 05 19:30:53 indexer-worker(XXXXX): Fatal: master: service(indexer-worker): child 809 killed
2003 Sep 16
2
openssh 3.7p1 bus error on sparcv9
openssh 3.7p1 sshd on Solaris 8 / sparcv9: sshd runs fine, and starts to allow the login. However, when reading from /etc/default/login, I get a bus error. I am able to get sshd to work by commenting out these lines in session.c: 1015,1018c1015 < # ifdef HAVE_ETC_DEFAULT_LOGIN < read_etc_default_login(&env, &envsize, pw->pw_uid); < path =
2010 Apr 05
1
dovecot-auth question
/export/rpoolbackup# dovecot -n # 1.2.10: /local/etc/dovecot.conf Warning: fd limit 256 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load (more than 768). Either grow the limit or change login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes settings # OS: SunOS 5.10 i86pc protocols: imaps pop3s ssl_cert_file: /local/ssl/certs/dovecot-cert.pem ssl_key_file: /local/ssl/private/dovecot-key.pem
2005 Dec 05
1
Strange automount problem with samba & LDAP
Hi all, I've installed samba-3.0.21rc2 on a solaris 10 machine (latest patches applied) by compiling from source: #uname -a SunOS newton 5.10 Generic_118844-20 i86pc i386 i86pc User's home is mounted using automount without any problem. But when I try to mount using samba, it can not access the users home directory when it 's share is not mounted and gives following error:
2006 Oct 31
0
PSARC/2002/762 Layered Trusted Solaris
Author: jpk Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: e7e07b2f4fcfbe725493f4074f9e9f0d8bfd8e1c Log message: PSARC/2002/762 Layered Trusted Solaris PSARC/2005/060 TSNET: Trusted Networking with Security Labels PSARC/2005/259 Layered Trusted Solaris Label Interfaces PSARC/2005/573 Solaris Trusted Extensions for Printing PSARC/2005/691 Trusted Extensions for Device Allocation PSARC/2005/723 Solaris
2005 Dec 28
4
"valid users" + ldap on Solaris 10 problems
Hello, We have just migrated a server from sun solaris 8 to sun solaris 10. In the old machine we had a Samba 3.0.20b and in the new one, we have samba 3.0.21, both compiled like this with no problems: env LD_FLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib" ./configure --with-ldapsam --without-pam --with-quotas --with-ldap --with-included-popt --with-acl-support --with-libsmbclient We share user's
2007 Dec 19
2
[Bug 11492] Bus error (SIGBUS recived)
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11492 riccardo at datahost.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|eric at anholt.net |swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org Status|NEEDINFO |NEW AssignedTo|eric at anholt.net
2017 Oct 31
2
lld: sigbus error handling
Does FreeBSD have fallocate(2) or equivalent? On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote: > On 23 October 2017 at 18:49, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> BTW, posix_fallocate() might provide better portability and decrease the > >> likelihood of falling back on ftruncate(). > >
2010 Apr 29
1
Aide error "Caught SIGBUS/SEGV"
One of my servers has recently started giving an error every time I run "aide --check". I ran it manually twice today with the same results. The second time, I added the -V flag, but that didn't give me anything useful. The system is currently running CentOS 5.3. Nothing on the system has changed recently (that I am aware of). The Aide database hasn't been updated in a few
2003 Oct 03
0
SIGBUS on SPARCv9
Hi there, I run tinc with not ConnectTo, (and it can't tcp-connect to the relevant other tincd, because that tincd is behind a firewall --> that tincd usualy connects to my tincd). If I start that tincd alone (not connected at all) and do a ping some_other_ip, it gets a SIGBUS in route.c:207 in the function route_ipv4_unreachable at the line: hdr->ip_v = 4; This seems to be an
2000 Jun 08
0
[Fwd: smbstatus getting a SIGBUS error]
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: smbstatus getting a SIGBUS error Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 13:52:13 +0700 From: Arnold Troeger <stssart@bkk.unocal.com> To: samba-bugs@samba.org CC: arnold.troeger@bkk.unocal.com I'm running Samba 2.0.7 and have been having a few problems with it. Just to keep things focused, I'll stick with smbstatus as this one has been the longest lasting
2017 Oct 30
2
lld: sigbus error handling
But that would disable mmap IO on systems that don't support fallocate. I'm not sure if OpenBSD people are for example happy about that. On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > If your system does not support fallocate(2), we use
2000 Jun 12
0
smbstatus getting a SIGBUS error
Somemore information regarding the smbstatus error. The sigbus error is occuring where I noted below. I now have data values to go along with the location. The SIGBUS generating bit is "entry_scanner_p->e.pid" which looks to be in an unaccessable area of memory. Looking back through the code, I find a couple of bizarities. For example file_scanner_p->num_share_mode_entries
2017 Oct 23
2
lld: sigbus error handling
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> If your system does not support fallocate(2), we use ftruncate(2) to >> create an output file. fallocate(2) succeeds even if your disk have less >> space than the
2017 Apr 07
0
abrt reported "imap killed by SIGBUS"
Please keep responses on list. Can you please run valgrind on this, as it appears to be some sort of memory corruption issue. Aki > On April 7, 2017 at 5:37 AM Hongying Liu <hongyliu at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for your response. > > (gdb) p cache > $1 = (struct mail_cache *) 0x7fc4a811a320 > (gdb) p cache->hdr > $2 = (const struct mail_cache_header