similar to: sigbus fault?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "sigbus fault?"

2006 May 28
0
sigbus fault ?
Hi Folks, I'm trying to run samba on Solaris 9. It works OK when I don't compile in kerberos and ldap, but when with those two compiled in, smbd seems to freeze (nmbd and winbindd are OK). After a bit of investigation I notice something strange in truss: ... /1@1: -> libldap-2.3:ldap_free_urldesc(0x30dfe8, 0x32e048, 0x32dfb8, 0x3 /1@1: ->
2010 Apr 05
1
dovecot-auth question
/export/rpoolbackup# dovecot -n # 1.2.10: /local/etc/dovecot.conf Warning: fd limit 256 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load (more than 768). Either grow the limit or change login_max_processes_count and max_mail_processes settings # OS: SunOS 5.10 i86pc protocols: imaps pop3s ssl_cert_file: /local/ssl/certs/dovecot-cert.pem ssl_key_file: /local/ssl/private/dovecot-key.pem
2005 Dec 05
1
Strange automount problem with samba & LDAP
Hi all, I've installed samba-3.0.21rc2 on a solaris 10 machine (latest patches applied) by compiling from source: #uname -a SunOS newton 5.10 Generic_118844-20 i86pc i386 i86pc User's home is mounted using automount without any problem. But when I try to mount using samba, it can not access the users home directory when it 's share is not mounted and gives following error:
2006 Oct 31
0
6312173 The libsldap function __ns_ldap_list() returns invaild DN string when using attributMap
Author: sdussud Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: da727245bf8a0e3cdabe620c5abcf05e3f55e70a Log message: 6312173 The libsldap function __ns_ldap_list() returns invaild DN string when using attributMap Files: update: usr/src/lib/libsldap/common/ns_reads.c update: usr/src/lib/libsldap/common/ns_sldap.h
2005 Aug 19
3
Samba and netgroups in LDAP
Hello, Has anyone got netgroups working with Samba 3.0.14a where the netgroups are stored in the LDAP directory? I'm using Solaris 9 and SUN's directory server v5.2. What I'm seeing is that samba goes through the motions of looking up a host in a netgroup, but no query is seen by the LDAP server or on the network and the host is never found in the netgroup. Any help would be
2005 Dec 28
4
"valid users" + ldap on Solaris 10 problems
Hello, We have just migrated a server from sun solaris 8 to sun solaris 10. In the old machine we had a Samba 3.0.20b and in the new one, we have samba 3.0.21, both compiled like this with no problems: env LD_FLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib" ./configure --with-ldapsam --without-pam --with-quotas --with-ldap --with-included-popt --with-acl-support --with-libsmbclient We share user's
2003 Nov 20
2
[Bug 740] Sun's pam_ldap account management is not working
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-11-19 23:20 ------- According to the man page, pam_ldap doesn't support account management. $ man pam_ldap [snip] The pam_ldap.so.1 module supports two components: the Authentication component and the Password management com- ponent. ------- You are
2010 Aug 20
2
samba 3.4.8 / solaris / unix secondary groups
samba-3.4.8 built under solaris_10 (--with-krb5=/usr/local/lib --with-ads --with-ldap); on my test server it runs flawlessly; however on the production server, there is a big exception: users' secondary group memberships are not honored. relevant portions of smb.conf (the same on both servers, save for the ip addys) are as follows: [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP netbios name = BLABLA server
2006 Oct 31
0
PSARC/2002/762 Layered Trusted Solaris
Author: jpk Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: e7e07b2f4fcfbe725493f4074f9e9f0d8bfd8e1c Log message: PSARC/2002/762 Layered Trusted Solaris PSARC/2005/060 TSNET: Trusted Networking with Security Labels PSARC/2005/259 Layered Trusted Solaris Label Interfaces PSARC/2005/573 Solaris Trusted Extensions for Printing PSARC/2005/691 Trusted Extensions for Device Allocation PSARC/2005/723 Solaris
2003 Apr 04
4
LDAP Supplementary Groups not recognised
We are implementing the following: Solaris 9 iPlanet Directory Server 5.1 (bundled with Solaris 9) openldap 2.1.16 Only used for ldap libaries (samba will not compile without. Is this other people's experience?) samba 2.2.8 compiled with ./configure --with-ldapsam --with-acl-support We have the samba server acting as a PDC with all user and machine accounts in LDAP as
2015 Jan 21
18
[Bug 2340] New: Openssh issue: unable to ssh the solaris server from ldap users
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2340 Bug ID: 2340 Summary: Openssh issue: unable to ssh the solaris server from ldap users Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Hardware: Sparc OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: PAM
2007 Dec 19
2
[Bug 11492] Bus error (SIGBUS recived)
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11492 riccardo at datahost.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|eric at anholt.net |swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org Status|NEEDINFO |NEW AssignedTo|eric at anholt.net
2017 Oct 31
2
lld: sigbus error handling
Does FreeBSD have fallocate(2) or equivalent? On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote: > On 23 October 2017 at 18:49, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> BTW, posix_fallocate() might provide better portability and decrease the > >> likelihood of falling back on ftruncate(). > >
2010 Apr 29
1
Aide error "Caught SIGBUS/SEGV"
One of my servers has recently started giving an error every time I run "aide --check". I ran it manually twice today with the same results. The second time, I added the -V flag, but that didn't give me anything useful. The system is currently running CentOS 5.3. Nothing on the system has changed recently (that I am aware of). The Aide database hasn't been updated in a few
2003 Oct 03
0
SIGBUS on SPARCv9
Hi there, I run tinc with not ConnectTo, (and it can't tcp-connect to the relevant other tincd, because that tincd is behind a firewall --> that tincd usualy connects to my tincd). If I start that tincd alone (not connected at all) and do a ping some_other_ip, it gets a SIGBUS in route.c:207 in the function route_ipv4_unreachable at the line: hdr->ip_v = 4; This seems to be an
2000 Jun 08
0
[Fwd: smbstatus getting a SIGBUS error]
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: smbstatus getting a SIGBUS error Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 13:52:13 +0700 From: Arnold Troeger <stssart@bkk.unocal.com> To: samba-bugs@samba.org CC: arnold.troeger@bkk.unocal.com I'm running Samba 2.0.7 and have been having a few problems with it. Just to keep things focused, I'll stick with smbstatus as this one has been the longest lasting
2017 Oct 30
2
lld: sigbus error handling
But that would disable mmap IO on systems that don't support fallocate. I'm not sure if OpenBSD people are for example happy about that. On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > If your system does not support fallocate(2), we use
2000 Jun 12
0
smbstatus getting a SIGBUS error
Somemore information regarding the smbstatus error. The sigbus error is occuring where I noted below. I now have data values to go along with the location. The SIGBUS generating bit is "entry_scanner_p->e.pid" which looks to be in an unaccessable area of memory. Looking back through the code, I find a couple of bizarities. For example file_scanner_p->num_share_mode_entries
2017 Oct 23
2
lld: sigbus error handling
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> If your system does not support fallocate(2), we use ftruncate(2) to >> create an output file. fallocate(2) succeeds even if your disk have less >> space than the
2017 Apr 07
0
abrt reported "imap killed by SIGBUS"
Please keep responses on list. Can you please run valgrind on this, as it appears to be some sort of memory corruption issue. Aki > On April 7, 2017 at 5:37 AM Hongying Liu <hongyliu at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for your response. > > (gdb) p cache > $1 = (struct mail_cache *) 0x7fc4a811a320 > (gdb) p cache->hdr > $2 = (const struct mail_cache_header