similar to: Can't get past login window

> For example: > $ llvmgcc ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe BTW, Chris, what should be then an analogy of "gcc -O3 -S foo.c" in LLVM framework? The invocation of $ llvmgcc -S ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe does not produce native assebler output as one might expect. -- Valery

Valery A.Khamenya wrote: >>For example: >>$ llvmgcc ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe > > > BTW, Chris, what should be then an analogy > of "gcc -O3 -S foo.c" in LLVM framework? > > The invocation of > > $ llvmgcc -S ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe > > does not produce native assebler output as one might expect.

Hi devels, there are two issues concerning invoking optimizations: 1. this document: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html is very nice, it would be good though to add in a section An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain examples on optimization step. 2. If i am not wrong there is no tool, which integrates all steps: llvmgcc->opt->llc into something like llcc (and

On Sat, 1 May 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > there are two issues concerning invoking optimizations: > > 1. > this document: > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html > is very nice, it would be good though to add in a section > > An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain > > examples on optimization step. That's an

Hallo, is ist possible to enter webin using a url including user and password. I ve to give some users access to the bind module via a status-webpage. Thanks Ralf

Hi all i took a look into LLVM benchmarks from nightly tester and ran Shootout tests on my own. Below go just few outlines. 1. results on my AMD AthlonXP and Xeon used by LLVM team are different sometime. In particular, both Shootout and Shootout-C++ show great speed up with LLVM (in comparison to GCC) on ackerman test on my AthlonXP. But here:

I thought I had things figured out, but guess not. I have multi-user Quickbooks databases that functioned fine on a Novell server but are behaving badly on a Samba share. I have created a separate share for the Quickbook databases, users are running Win XP Pro, latest patches, and the Quickbooks application installed on the desktop. It is a multiuser version. Server is RedHat ES 3, Samba

Dear Sir, Hello, My name is kenneth Yeung. I wonder to know how to configure samba or window to access samba folder without login prompt. ! I am using Wins 2K for client, and Linux server is set samba server. I can login to samba using username and password, but I want to do a windows backup schedule task without prompt. login window ! Could you tell me the method to do this task. Thank you for

Hi, I have a plot that is essentially the same as that in Figure 5.6 of "Lattice - Multivariate Data Visualization with R". The key difference is that I would like to add a title to top of the grey color spectrum legend, but have thus far been unsuccessful. I've tried a variety of options, but to no avail. I'm new to R, and admittedly I don't understand the

Hello, I'm new to the list and pretty much a newbie to linux and samba. I'm quick learner though. I have been losing my samba share upon ocasion recently, below is a portion of the syslog from the time period that I think is when the share goes down. A reboot of the server or a restart of the smbd fixes the problem (....until it happens again) I don't know what SIGUP is or why

The smb service is not starting automatically. I can type service smb start at the prompt and it loads, and I can then connect, but its not loading automatically as it used to. Can someone point me in the right direction as what file I need to change to make it load at startup. Thanks! Liz

On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > i took a look into LLVM benchmarks from nightly tester and > ran Shootout tests on my own. Below go just few outlines. > > 1. results on my AMD AthlonXP and Xeon used by LLVM > team are different sometime. In particular, both Shootout > and Shootout-C++ show great speed up with LLVM (in >

Hi all, I have a laptop in UEFI mode running CentOS 8.2. All works fine but when I enable Secure Boot, login via gdm is no longer possible. Console login is ok. I found some related discussions over on Ubuntu forums, suggesting that this could be related to 3rd-party kernel modules, such as nvidia. This laptop has only Intel builtin graphics, and every single module installed is part of the

Hi to both adressed mailing lists, I followed the instructions in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/EximAndDovecotSASL exim.conf: | plain: | driver = dovecot | public_name = PLAIN | server_socket = /var/run/dovecot/auth-client | server_set_id = $auth1 | | login: | driver = dovecot | public_name = LOGIN | server_socket = /var/run/dovecot/auth-client |

Hello People I''m new here, so forgive-me for any "newbie talk". My client is running Debian Sarge (Stable), with Shorewall and Webmin. I want to make things easier for them and tried to use the webmin-shorewall module. The thing is - the installed shorewall is 3.0.5 (package from testing) but the webmin module only understands (and builds) the old shorewall 2.x file

Apropos http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/InstallWebminRepo Suggested changes (mostly nit-picky :-) ... -------------------------------------------------------------------- Change: Webmin is a web-based interface ... to: [http://www.webmin.com/index.html WebMin] is a web-based interface ... -------------------------------------------------------------------- Change: When you install

Hi, > I recently converted my employer's firewall from pure iptabes to > firewalld and looked for something similar, more along the lines of > webmin, etc. funny, my webmin installation on a banana-pi has webmin 1.831, which has support for firewalld. I am not sure, but I believe I got it directly from www.webmin.com. best regards --- Michael Schumacher

I just updated my webmin on my server and noticed that the module for Shorewall looked different. It looks like someone really cleaned it up and had it added to the Standard Webmin Module list. Woohoo. -- Joe *** I can only please one person a day. Today is not your day and tomorrow doesn''t look good either. ***

I just updated my webmin on my server and noticed that the module for Shorewall looked different. It looks like someone really cleaned it up and had it added to the Standard Webmin Module list. Woohoo. -- Joe *** I can only please one person a day. Today is not your day and tomorrow doesn''t look good either. ***

I have registered a project with Sourceforge to produced a Webmin module for Shorewall. http://sourceforge.net/projects/webmin-shorewal/ Anyone interested in participating please email me at enemyofthestate at users.sourceforge.net I am still learning the interface but I think I need your Sourceforge Nym to add you as a developer. -- Stephen Carville Unix and Network Adminstrator