similar to: File creation permission issue

Saludos colegas. Soy nuevo en R y me gustaría saber si es posible embeber código HTML en funciones R para hacer interfaces web. Es decir, lo que quiero hacer es una aplicación web que utilice R para el procesamiento estadístico de los datos y que me los grafique en la web. ¿Es posible hacer esto? . Saludos. --

hi there ! I want to change a novell-netware server to a samba server, and there i have a big problem with the file-permitions ! we use a big database-system. the clients searches for the programs and for the data's on the same drive, so i must have one share with different rights (rwx ... for data and rx for programs) the directory structure is the following: vol1\ \flex31d

Hello All, I've been trying to compile samba-1.9.18p4 for the last couple of hours and seem to keep running into problems compiling smbpasswd. I'm running Slackware 3.4 Here's last section I tried to use from the Makefile: # Use this for Linux with shadow passwords - but not using PAM! # contributed by Andrew.Tridgell@anu.edu.au # add -DLINUX_BIGCRYPT is you have shadow passwords

I am trying to connect with smbmount to a VAX/VMS system running, I believe, PathWorks. Using smbclient: $ smbclient '\\cowboy\hopkins' -UHOPKINS -Icowboy Added interface ip=199.187.33.84 bcast=199.187.33.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Server time is Tue Jun 2 14:45:26 1998 Timezone is UTC-0.0 Password: security=user smb: \> ls AWHSTUFF.RS 31750 Thu May 28

Running 3.0.4 on FreeBSD 5.2.1... I have two directories... drwxrwxr-x root data_current /usr/vol1/current drwxrwx--- root data_current /usr/vol1/hold If a file is in /usr/vol1/hold with the following attributes... -rwxrwx--- root data_hold file1 ...and a user MOVES it to /usr/vol1/current it has the following attributes... -rwxrwx--- root data_hold file1 ...if the user COPIES

Saludos colegas. Estoy utilizando el entorno rattle para probar algunas tareas de minería de datos sobre un dataset. Sucede que desde hace unos días cuando intento utilizar rattle me lanza el siguiente error: *> rattle() Error en ret[i, ] <- c(pkgs[i], lib, desc) : número de items para para sustituir no es un múltiplo de la longitud del reemplazo* Llevo algún tiempo intentando

> -----Original Message----- > From: Kurt Heinrich > Sent: Thursday, 4 May 2000 14:29 > To: 'samba@samba.org' > Subject: Browsing issues NT WS 4.0 and Samba > > Hi Guys/Girls, > > I have recently been trying to implement samba into our environment here > as a replacement for ftp clients. > > What I am finding is that windows explorer (NT W/S 4.0)

I have one Samba share on my server (RH9). The permission on the shared folders/files are set to 777. The owner of the files/folders is let's say X. When I mount the share on my workstation (Mandrake 9.1) using the username, uid and gid option (of user X) the owner of the files that I see at the mount point is still X, but the permissions are now 755. Why aren't the permission's

Hi, I've got a Debian 3.0 machine from which I initiate rsync connections over ssh to winNT/2k boxen, where sshd is running as a service, to grab files from the windows machines. I don't get any error from either side of the connection. The directory I indicate is transferred as well as every sub directory, just not any of the files in the sub directories. The process seems to be running

I have installed Redhat 8.0 with the Sgi xfs rpm kernel running. I also recompiled the srpm from Redhat's ftp site with acl support. I have a partition called data that was formatted in xfs. I can do a getfacl and it works on the directories and seems to be working. I am trying to change the permission's from a windows machine logged in as root but nothing seems to work. When I

I have a Samba 3.0.24-7 on Fedora 6 as a member of an Windows NT 4.0 domain, with a simple share setup with ACLs. The permissions on the share from Windows XP Pro Security tab shows Everyone, and root (Unix Group\root) without any Permissions. When trying to add permissions from XP while logged on as CPDOM+admin the error is display "Unable to save permission changes on "share

Hi Samba gurus, I need your help for the problem of denying the change of the print driver settings on samba. I have no any clue of this problem. Thanks for any comments and tips. Our institution has a windows 2000 active directory domain; I joined my test samba 2.2.6 on a Linux box into domain as the file/print member server. All the file sharing worked fine, but when I tried to upload

Hi Samba gurus, I need your help for the problem of denying the change of the print driver settings on samba. I have no any clue of this problem. Thanks for any comments and tips. Our institution has a windows 2000 active directory domain; I joined my test samba 2.2.6 on a Linux box into domain as the file/print member server. All the file sharing worked fine, but when I tried to upload

Hi all, I'm experiencing a problem when NTBACKING'UP my W2000 Server files against a Linux 2.4.9 + ReiserFS 3.6 file system + Samba share. It works OK for the first 4 Gb's around file size. Then ntbackup stops serving data and the file on the samba side appears to be downsized to 0 and growing ssssslowly. Once you stop ntbackup by killing the process, the file reappears at its real

Hi Nithya, I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: [root at stor1 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 stor1data:/volumedisk0 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 stor1data:/volumedisk1

Hi Nithya, My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks per volume). Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance force' operation. This task finished successfully (you can see info below) and number of files on the 3 nodes were very similar . For volumedisk1 I

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 18:28, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: > > That is good to hear. > [root at stor1 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdc1

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 22:31, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. > A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks > per volume). > Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance > force' operation.

Hi, Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I realized that the total size reported by df command was changed and is smaller than the aggregated capacity of all the bricks in the volume. I checked that all the volumes status are fine, all the glusterd daemons are running, there is no error in logs, however df shows a bad total size. My configuration for one volume:

Hi Nithya, Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------