similar to: Unix extensions and symlinks dereferencing

This post http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/153262/get-rsync-to-dereference-symlinked-dirs-presented-on-cmdline-like-find-h explains most of what i want, but basically, looking for a find -H option to rsync. Reason is so that I can hit a source (or target!) dir in rsync by making a nice dir of symlink maps. For eg openVZ names their containers with ID#s which isnt very condusive to

Sorry for the confusion, I pasted the code I fixed locally... Here is the code at top of the trunk: // load (select (cond, null, P)) -> load P if (Constant *C = dyn_cast<Constant>(SI->getOperand(1))) if (C->isNullValue()) { LI.setOperand(0, SI->getOperand(2)); return &LI; } So it is a bug? -----Original Message----- From:

Computer A runs my samba server. Has unix extensions = off, wide links = on (don't think this one matters with unix extensions off...) This way, if I have a symlink on my shares, clients see it as a normal file, not as a symlink. This works fine, even for symlinks to files outside the shares paths. Except when the symlink points to a file that is on a CIFS mount. So say I have computer B

Hi all, Quick question - does Samba server still support Unix extensions when connecting over SMB3? My Linux client recently got upgraded to a CIFS module version that uses SMB3 by default, and since then I lost the ability to create symlinks on my CIFS shares. Running "mount" shows the share mounted with the "nounix" option. If I follow the advice in dmesg and add the

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:23:15PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > On 23.01.15 22:16, Ralph B?hme wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > >>> On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > >>>> I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are

On 06/01/16 17:36, Andreas Maier wrote: > Hi, > I have started using symbolic links on an SMB share and find that > symbolic links whose target no longer exists cannot be removed on the > client side. > > Example, on the SMB client side in an SMB-mounted directory: > > 1. Create a file and a relative symlink to it: > > $ touch a > $ ln -s a b > $

Hello -- We have a Solaris 10 ZFS server running Samba with "follow symlinks=yes" set. We're noticing that if you delete (via Samba) a file that is a symbolic link pointing to a subdirectory somewhere, with files in that subdir, it will not only delete the symbolic link file, but also delete the files in the target subdirectory. On Unix, if you delete a symbolic link, it will

Considering you cant INCLUDE a directory that is a symlink... which would be really handy right now for me to resolve a mapping of 103 -> meaningful_name for backups, instead im resorting to temporary bind mounts of 103 onto meaningful_name, and when the bind mount isnt there, the --del is emptying meaningful_name accidentally at times. I think both situations could benefit from a

On 23.01.15 22:37, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:23:15PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: >> On 23.01.15 22:16, Ralph B?hme wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: >>>>> On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: >>>>>> I

Hi, I have started using symbolic links on an SMB share and find that symbolic links whose target no longer exists cannot be removed on the client side. Example, on the SMB client side in an SMB-mounted directory: 1. Create a file and a relative symlink to it: $ touch a $ ln -s a b $ ls -l total 0 -rw-rw-r--. 1 andi andi 0 Jan 6 14:42 a lrwxrwxrwx. 1 andi andi 1

Hello, I’m trying to port a project up to 4.0 and I’m seeing the following error: In file included from /Users/jaredcarlson/Projects/llvm-4.0.0.src/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h:13: /Users/jaredcarlson/Projects/llvm-4.0.0.src/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h:139:13: error: no type named 'type' in 'std::__1::result_of<std::__1::pointer_to_unary_function<llvm::DSNode *, llvm::DSNode

Hi! How can I let recent smbd versions let unix clients access and resolve 'wide' symlinks locally? My goal is that clients may use any kind of symlink (internal and external to a mounted share) like on any other unix-style file system without smbd interfering. My understanding is that since version 3.4.6, smbd effectively denies access of clients to 'wide' symlinks, i.e. out of

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:09:52PM +0200, Aurélien Aptel via samba wrote: > Dan Janowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: > > > [ Unknown signature status ] > > Does os x (10.13) support negotiation of unix extensions/CIFS? > > > > When hard links didn’t work I dug in and while I found info on CAP_UNIX, and added ‘unix extensions = yes’ globally,

Sure, but did you even try my advice.. ?? So again.. from smb.conf unix extensions (G) allow insecure wide links (G) wide links (S) follow symlinks (S) G = Global S = Share So here you are lazy ... ( fill the dots..) ;-) Read below .... from : man smb.conf In normal operation the option wide links which allows the server to follow symlinks outside of a share path is automatically

Hi, I would like to understand better the meaning of constant null pointer in LLVM IR. Can the optimizer assume that dereferencing a null pointer is always unreachable? Or is it only the case for address space 0? Is it ok to have null pointer be a valid pointer for an address space other than 0? In InstCombine pass in InstCombiner::visitLoadInst(LoadInst &LI) I see that we replace load of

04.05.2023 15:32, Ralph Boehme ?????: > On 5/4/23 13:57, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> Is it possible for windows to actually see and use symlinks on samba server? >> Windows NTFS does have notion of junctions and symbolic links, so when one >> open file A (which is a symbolic link), windows actually opens file B. >> Can such mechanism be used when A is on samba

Hello, I am using Samba version 4.2.0rc4-GIT-4701d74. When using a connection in protocol smb2 or smb3, the unix client says symlinks are not supported, for example: # mount //ip.addr/Programs ./tmp -o vers=3.0 # cd tmp # ln -s bla blub ln: failed to create symbolic link ?blub?: Operation not supported # mount //ip.addr/Programs on /mnt/tmp type cifs

I am having trouble getting asterisk-addons 1.4.2 to compile (after a successful configure). Asterisk itself (and AsteriskGUI) compile fine. I get: cdr_addon_mysql.c: In function `handle_cdr_mysql_status': cdr_addon_mysql.c:91: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type cdr_addon_mysql.c:93: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type cdr_addon_mysql.c:95: error: dereferencing

That’s very awesome. I’ll take a stab at getting it set up > On Apr 3, 2018, at 2:16 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 12:09:52PM +0200, Aurélien Aptel via samba wrote: >> Dan Janowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> >>> [ Unknown signature status ] >>> Does os x (10.13) support negotiation

The context dependent files, as they appear to be implemented in the transname patch, looks like a source of security holes. Do not enable the transname patch without limiting its effect to a single group (a compile time option). Many of the possible exploits involve creating files with the for /targetfilepath#hostname=myhost# where myhost is the local machine. In general, if you have access to