similar to: Enabling filenames with ?, *, etc ?

Hi all, First, my apologies if this is not the right forum for this... if there is a more appropriate place to make OpenSSH feature requests, or if this feature already exists, please let me know. Some background: My company makes an 'embedded' audio server box that runs Debian Linux, and one of the product's features is that users can upload files to the server via SSH, using their

Hello all, I have 2 identical Dell r510 servers with 10gig card, running centos 6 with samba-3.5.4-68.el6_0.2.x86_64. I setup 16G ramdisk samba share on both and ran cp from local ramdisk to samba ramdisk mount. If I cp 12 1-gig files, I get combined 100MB/s transfer rate. Single file cp maxes out at about 15MB/s. Ftp transfer give me over 300MB/s. Running with 9000 MTU. Most smb.conf is

Hi, i have a rather weird and also problematic use case. My NAS provides permissions but I don't know how. The share is mounted using unix extensions and I am seeing user IDs. However my /local/ filesystem refuses me to allow to do anything unless I am root or set the noperms flag (ostensibly). This means that locally write access is denied but not remotely. The local user is UID 1000.

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:03:41AM -0800, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > Check out the latest cifsfs code. I think Steve > and Aurelian and Ronnie added an ioctl for this. > > I'm here at Vault in Boston with Steve, I'll ask > him :-). Steve says there are two utilities in Linux, getcifsacl and setcifsacl that use a custom ioctl inside the Linux cifsfs kernel

Hi all, My server machine is running samba version 4.4.4 on Linux with 'smb encryption = mandatory' option. My client is a Ubuntu 16.10 Linux machine. I am looking for a way to mount the encrypted samba share on the Linux client machine. I noticed that mount.cifs does not support encryption but smbclient does with an -e flag, however it seems to only be usable in a ftp-like interface.

Should be simple and perhaps I'm tired but it's not coming to me. In its simplest form... for old in `cat "$FILENAME"`;do echo "$old" dirname "$old" new="$(echo $old | sed 's/\*/\-/')" done I'm trying to take out some stupid Macintosh things - in this case filenames with asterisks but I have others like tilde's and probably

Hello, I sent the following message to the Debian folks. They don't think that the Debian packaging could be responsible for the issue described there. > Well, I'm not completely convinced that we will have very useful input > for you. I don't really see any reason for this to be caused by the > Debian packaging. To check this, why not compile samba from sources,

Thanks for the first reply, Jeremy. What about the (future) implementation of RichACL? Will there be any native Linux Client support along with the SMB2/SMB3 protocol? I know, there is a native implemenation for RichACLs in ext4 FS. Unfortunately, smbcals is not a native Linux ACL Tool and has a very unhandy syntax. I just tested some days ago. ;-) I am looking for a solution that allows the

Does samba server handle multiple smb commands (not necessarily andx commands) within one packet? If a client were to send commands such as 0x2f, 0x32, 0x32 in one packet instead of three separate packets, does samba server handle it i.e. respond to each of the three requests?

I'm using debian Sarge, Samba 3.0.6-3, Kernel 2.6.8 I use smbmount //server/share mymountpt -oguest which connects fine, but it all dies (hangs) if I try to look in that mounted directory with konqueror in kde OR nautillus in gnome. In dmesg of the server computer I get: smb_proc_readdir_long: error=-512, breaking and the same but with error -13 smb_add_request ... Timed Out! this last

I'm backing up a bunch of Windows machines onto a linux box (FC3, Samba 3.0.8-0.pre1.3) and it works great... UNLESS some idiot disconnects or shuts down his computer while I'm running the backup, and then my rsync command hangs while trying to copy the files from that computer's smbmounted drive to the server. Isn't there some sort of way to soft mount the samba share or

Hey folks, I've seen questions similar to this asked in the archives, but didn't really find a suitable answer. I'm trying to send backups to a Windows2000 share, and I'm having trouble with large files: [root@mail backups]# cp -R 20050208/ /mnt/backup/ File size limit exceeded It only copies 2,147,483,647 bytes, and the file is 5,030,998,091. I could split up

Hi, I was trying smbmount (SuSE's samba-client-3.0.20b-3.4). The mount command replied: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 9451: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection failed No I'd suggest to change the message at least: It's unclear who "we" is: The Samba Team, the client, or the server The server is a "Windows 2003 server",

Hello Samba Lists: I am trying to read a 22TB file from a system running OpenSuSE 10.3/x64 (Using whatever version of Samba came out with 10.3/x64). The file is on a 30TB XFS volume. I'm connecting over 10GBit Ethernet from a Windows Server 2003/X64 client. If I try to read the 22TB file, I get the message "Access Denied", but if I try to read 100GB files from the same volume, they

I'm using samba to mount a share from a linux device onto a linux computer. Obviously, for some reason, I can *see* the symbolic links as links, however I cannot delete or create them. But the only Linux/Unix alternative seems to be NFS, which is not really suited for what I want (annoyance with users having to map, etc.) Is there any sort of commonsensical approach to this that can

Hi. Is there such a limit to 2GB in samba 2.2.8a-1? I get a "File imit exceeded" when I try to tar or cp smth to a smbmount. On both machines I can successfully do dd if=/dev/zero and create a file of 3GB, I can also tar -cvf it but no cp to smb. RH8 if it matters...

I have an OS X 10.4 Server machine that has abysmal performance when copying files to it over smbmount from a linux machine or through Finder on OS X but performs very well when copying files through smbclient from the same Linux and OS X machines. I have already tried the commonly suggested adjustment of net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 and have not noticed a significant performance improvement.

Does samba 3.0.23c not support the use of O_DIRECT? When I try to open an smbmount'd file using O_DIRECT, I get EINVAL. I am able to use O_DIRECT with no problems on a block device and nfs mounts, so I know the kernel supports it. samba: 3.0.23c kernel: 2.6.9-42.0.3.EL (32-bit) I am using the below code for my test. smb fails on open(2). #include <fcntl.h> #include

Hi list. I am wondering if I am running the right software to get my windows 7 shares mounted. could someone please tell me, what is the difference between samba, and smbclient? at the moment, I have samba and smbclient installed. I also have smbfs installed, though I understand this is deprecated, I just thought I might be able to get smbfs to work whereas I can't get samba, smbclient and

I have a system that I'm vetting as a NAS server. It has a 2.0TB XFS filesystem mounted on /storage and I'm doing benchmarks using nfs3, nfs4, and samba. I'm testing via iozone by mounting the filesystem from my "nas client" box and then running iozone on the mounted filesystem. NFS seems pretty fast - ie, several orders of magnitude faster than samba, and I'm