similar to: File locking problem

I posted a problem with oplock previously, but am guessing it goto lost in an earlier thread with the same subject line, so here goes another shot: Using Samba 3.0.22 on a Gentoo box (kernel 2.6.15) I've a situation where file locking does not seem to be functioning as expected, in that more than one user can open and write to a file without any notifications being displayed about the file

Hi all I am fairly new to samba and XP. I have a client who we set up a samba server for, they are complaining about documents taking about 30 secs -2-3mins to open but only sometimes (it can be very frequent). I have seen this and captured a piece of the log file I wonder if any one can make any sense of it... I have been looking on the net and trying various things all day but to no avail...

I'm hoping someone has some insight into a problem I'm currenty having, which is: No one is able to edit (in place) documents with Word 2000 on a samba (2.2.6) disk share. A user can open word and save a document to the share, but when they go to edit the document Word says "Word cannot complete the save due to a file permission error". From Microsoft KB Q211632 it appears

infernix wrote: > Copying a 107MB mp3 file takes almost 4 minutes (238 seconds) > when I copy it with samba. [Using windows explorer under Windows 2000 --dave] > With FTP, it takes 27 seconds. > 238 divided by 27 = 8.5 times slower. Ho boy, that's bad. > I have several machines available to do testing, but you'd have to let me > know how and what. I am a linux

I've got a couple of Solaris 7 boxes that are running samba 2.2.0. When I try to copy text files from a windows 2000 client to the server, the resulting file is filled with all NULL characters. I tried copying the same file to a NT server's share and there was no corruption. When copying to the solaris share, the windows 2000 client eventually gives the following error: The

Hello all, Either the docs or the value in smb.conf.default is wrong. (Or at least confusing).

(Samba 3.0.21c / kernel 2.4.27 / Debian Sarge) Hello, One of my user open a file (located on a SAMBA server) in its application, and when he tries to save it, he gets a "share violation" error. (other people have this problem too). This error happens since I upgraded the SAMBA server from 3.0.14a to 3.0.21c. smbstatus for this file: 32613 DENY_WRITE 0x20089 RDONLY

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:01:34PM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > The symptom is that the windows process which is accessing the samba share > hangs > Also, if you try to open the same share (you can do the connection) to see > the files, the ls command hangs > > The other samba shares don't be affected at all, they work ok > > So the only thing you can do is a

Question regarding file permissions on Samba 3.0.22: Using a Windows XP client when I attempt to change the file permissions of a directory (or any single file for that matter) once I click the 'OK' button the properties window closes as expected, but upon opening the security permissions tab again I notice the permissions have revented back to how they were beforehand. If I click

Hi, We test a software called Safekit. This software permit to have a replicated FS and can start some apps from a particular script. We use this startup script for starting SaMBa. We make this test : NODE1 : Samba not actif (SECOND) NODE2 : Samba is running (PRIM) open a file with samba and modify it make swap I try to save and no possible to save, but if I close the file and reopen it it

I am running two Fedora 13 servers, one as a Samba PDC and the other as a BDC. For the past week I have been tracing a series of issues which may or may not be related to Samba 3.5.4. Here is one problem that I am tracking and need help from the list with suggestions. >From a wireshark trace between my Samba server and an XP client I am seeing the following error status returned for up to a

I need to temporarily disable a share for a few days, I remember there was an entry I could add to the share definition to temporarily disable the share (I think it was disabled=true or enabled=false) but I can't remember what it was for sure, nor can I find it in the manual. what is it ?

I am running NOX controller with a python script that prints out the destination mac and the source mac for each packet arriving at the now controller and then floods it out. So here's what happening: With em1 connected, all the packets that arrive at em1 are coming to the controller and printing out the details. However, without em1 connected to the OVS, when I have the following setup:

HI I have 15 vm (libvirt + kvm) with a network brigde and ip address like 192.168.0.1 VM1 192.168.0.2 VM2 192.168.0.3 VM3 ..... The vm are use by other people and I want to be sure that if someone change the ip of VM3 to 192.168.0.1 it will filter it network traffic for him and can't flood the VM1 What the best way to achieve this Hope I m clear enough

Is it possible to use this exploit against a kvm guest to read memory used by the host? In other words: if an exploitable service, say httpd with mod_ssl, is running in guest system 'vm1' hosted on system 'virthost' then what implications does that have with respect to guests vm2 and vm3 and to virthost itself? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James

Is it possible to use this exploit against a kvm guest to read memory used by the host? In other words: if an exploitable service, say httpd with mod_ssl, is running in guest system 'vm1' hosted on system 'virthost' then what implications does that have with respect to guests vm2 and vm3 and to virthost itself? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James

I just upgraded my Member Server to 3.2.4 on Ubuntu. I have a permissions problem. Users can create files on the Samba shares but they cannot delete files. Here is a typical share definition. [Testing] comment = Test for Samba path = /files/test browseable = yes writeable = yes create mask = 0764 directory mask = 0775 On the Linux side I can do

I'm running Samba 2.2.8a on SuSE Linux 8.1 with kernel 2.4.19. I have a share defined by this on a web server to allow members of the jamigos group to edit web pages. [users] comment = User Web Pages path = /home valid users = @jamigos read only = No create mask = 0664 force create mode = 0664 directory mask = 0775

hi alll.. i want to find the xen domain''s state using xm domstate command, domstate command works fine inside virish but when i try with xm like [xm domestate VM_NAME] its giving an error saying subcomand domestate not found. i just want to shutoff the xen virtual domains using a scrip to take backup. so i just want to make sure that the domain are shutdown successfully after

I have a BSD system that I installed samba 2.2.7a onto. Smbd and nmbd both work great but if I try to use smbclient to connect to a WinXPpro (service pack 1) machine like this: smbclient //BO/C$ password -I 207.x.x.x -U Administrator -W NETENG -n HOMER I keep getting NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE. I put a sniffer on the XP Pro machine and see the NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE message. Is there a problem