similar to: User Manger for Domains can not reset user password.

Hi all, I can add my W2K machines to the Samba 3.0.5pre1 with no problems, but I can not add my XP machines. Existing XP machines work fine, but when I try to add new XP machine it does not work. Here is my smb.conf and pc from the log.smbd Thanks -Glenn [global] netbios name = HSFNP01 workgroup = MTHCS security = user os level = 64 domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes

I created a brand new nt 4.0 server with exchange 5.5 server in my samba 3.0 pdc domain with no problems. The exchange server runs fine under the samba 3.0 pdc, but when I try to install exchange 5.5 sp4 on the exchange server the service pack gives me an Dr. Watson error. The exchange service pack makes it through the copying of the service pack files and then modifies the registry settings for

Hello, I need some help with the following errors that I have in my log.smbd: [2004/09/01 21:14:39, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_suffix(1126) smbldap_search_suffix: Problem during the LDAP search: (Size limit exceeded) [2004/09/01 21:14:39, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_setsampwent(1078) ldapsam_setsampwent: LDAP search failed: Size limit exceeded [2004/09/01 21:14:39, 0]

I am setting up a OpenLdap PDC with file and print services on Ubuntu Jaunty. Jaunty ships with samba 3.3.2. I configured samba to just use the registry back in which I think is pretty cool! What happend when I use the Add print wizard to add my Windows XP drivers I get the famous "unable to install driver access denied" message. I can ssh into the box with my user id and create files in

First off I have read the SAMBA 2.2 printer documetation and Samba Printing Documentation for 3.0. And searched the Internet through Google and did not come up with much. Maybe it is how I am doing search I don't know. I had some success using CUPS for Point and Click printing using cupaddsmb command. I could get the print drivers to download on W2K and XP. But, I could not get the the

Hello all, I've got an old server running SAMBA 3.3.0. I've some shares on it. All shares looks like this : [partinfo] path=/shares/partinfo valid users = +info force user = %U force group = info read only = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 All works perfectly : When I create a file on this share other users in the info group can modify it but nobody can delete it

Hello, We have a problem with our Samba server (we tested with two versions 3.6.6 and 4.1.11). When a User edit an Excel file and saves, another user can not save this edited later. The temporary file named like 885E9010 will be created and Excel reports that this file can not be accessed. I have test it with Windows and Mac. Both have the same Problem. This is our samba configuration:

Hi, I have a share (testshare) where different unix groups (testgroup1, testgroup2) should have access to. But I want that new files are only created with 660 permissions. Here are the ACL's of testshare: # file: testshare # owner: ralfgro # group: ve user::rwx group::rwx group:testgroup1:rwx group:testgroup2:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::---

Hai, sorry about the delay.. i had to do some work here.. in my global settings in smb.conf ## Acl-EA settings ea support = yes store dos attributes = yes map archive = no map hidden = no map system = no map readonly = no inherit permissions = yes inherit acls = yes map acl inherit = yes acl group control = yes

Hi all I have a running samba 3.0.21c with OpenLDAP 2.3 configured as PDC, and also one BDC with same version of samba and openldap. It was working fine far the past few months. There are about 400 users on the domain and 600 groups. There 2 file servers [Domain Member server]( linux system RHEL 4.0 update3 with samba version 3.0.21c joined to the domain) which provides shares. All the users get

ok.. and you did also a .. chmod -R 2770 /path/to/dir The folder you are share-ing also needs 2770 >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: Oliver Werner [mailto:oliver.werner at kontrast.de] >Verzonden: donderdag 19 februari 2015 13:45 >Aan: L.P.H. van Belle >CC: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Excel and Samba Problem > >I have try it but does not

If everything fails try this. Is working form e even on a windows 8.1X64 client full patched in a samba 3.6 domain and Samba 4. Ans I run it on a ext3 glusterd replicating share without any issue First set the sticky bit for your group on that share [share] path= /yourpath posix locking =NO <--I need that for my gluster not shure you will readonly=no valid users = @yourusersgroup

Hi, I have just put Samba3alpha23 on my Suse 8.1 box and and implement the new goup structure in LDAP. All works fine expect when you log in a a user other than root on the windows box. The error is : [2003/04/08 13:30:19, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(2198) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (Insufficient access)ldapsam_open: cannot access

look at this thread. http://userssuck.com/2007/03/13/samba-file-permission-issue-with-microsoft-office/ try adding : posix locking = no >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: belle at bazuin.nl [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] >Namens L.P.H. van Belle >Verzonden: donderdag 19 februari 2015 16:53 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Excel and

Hi - I'm trying to verify if OpenSSH/SFTP will in fact lock files with advisory file locking in Linux. I can test locking with the linux "flock" command to verify that file locking does work - but when I upload or download a file with SFTP it will not detect a lock. I'm asking about Linux specifically because about a year ago I was doing a similar process in Solaris 9 and

Hi all, I'm writing a script that uses rsync to sync 2 dirs on C7. I noticed a strange behaviour. I have 2 dir: src and dest. In src dir I generate a testfile with "dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1M count=100" and when I run "du -h testfile" I get the correct result. Then I sync src/ to dest/ using "rsync -avS? src/ dest/", all ok but when I run "du -h

Hi, Recently I noticed file.copy() would discard the file mode information. Is this the expected behaviour or a bug for file.copy()? > file.create('testfile') [1] TRUE > file.info('testfile') size isdir mode mtime ctime testfile 0 FALSE 644 2011-03-05 17:06:39 2011-03-05 17:06:39 atime uid gid uname grname

Hi, Recently I noticed file.copy() would discard the file mode information. Is this the expected behaviour or a bug for file.copy()? > file.create('testfile') [1] TRUE > file.info('testfile') size isdir mode mtime ctime testfile 0 FALSE 644 2011-03-05 17:06:39 2011-03-05 17:06:39 atime uid gid uname grname

Did you try fort he share: oplocks = no level2 oplocks = no EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 T?bingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Oliver Werner [mailto:oliver.werner at kontrast.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Februar

Maybe it works, maybe it doesn''t, but I sure as hell can''t make it work. I get stuck with "Could not find object(s)" whatever I do This is my module init.pp class ztest::setup { notice "MAIN SETUP CLASS" file { directfile: path => "/etc/directfile", owner => root, group => root, mode => 0644, content