similar to: Stable Network Down

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Stable Network Down"

2005 Jul 05
3
[Fwd: Samba-3 By Ex Chapt 3]
One more thing I forgot to mention. The chapter calls for editing /etc/resolv.conf, but in my case it won't stay edited--it keeps getting set back to an original form (for searching my ISP) on every reboot. Thanks again. Eric Hines -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Samba-3 By Ex Chapt 3 Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:47:09 -0500 From: Eric Hines <eehines@comcast.net> To:
2006 Apr 06
12
net drive mapping not working in login script
I've set the path for each user in pdbedit and created a login script with drive mapping etc etc The network drives aren't being mapped when I login each user: smb.conf [global] printcap name = cups cups options = raw map to guest = Bad User # include = /etc/samba/dhcp.conf logon path = \\%L\profiles\.msprofile logon home = \\%L\%U\.9xprofile
2006 Apr 16
0
[Fwd: Re: can't connect to swat]
Sorry for the direct post.... Eric Hines -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] can't connect to swat Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 08:51:45 -0500 From: EHines <eehines@comcast.net> To: Larry Weldon <lweldon@weldoncomputers.com> References: <02a201c66148$c8925290$0c46a8c0@jshinotebook> <1145194206.20034.72.camel@tiger.home.welcoin.com> Larry Weldon
2005 Dec 19
3
OT: NIC
Folks, I'm trying to add a network interface card to my SUSE 9.3 box, and I'm not having much luck with a US Robotics version. What manufacturer do any of you use in your machines--either 10/100MB or GigE NIC? Thanks Eric Hines There is no nonsense so errant that it cannot be made the creed of the vast majority by adequate governmental action. --Bertrand Russell
2005 Feb 28
1
[Fwd: Re: Won't Start Automatically]
Hi, ntsysv doesn't list the samba daemons (smbd, nmbd), and while I could use chkconfig, it appears, to add the daemons, I'd rather do this via the rcx.d links so I can understand what's going on. Eric Hines -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Sp0oKeR Labs <spooker@gmail.com> <snip>Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:35:32 -0300 Did u try ntsysv ou chkconfig? Are you using
2005 Dec 08
1
Share Connection Failure
I'm at my wit's end on this, and I hope someone can help. I'm running SUSE Pro 9.3 with Samba 3.0.13, and I can't get connected to my shares properly. Valid users (e.g., for [accounts]) is set to %G, and I've confirmed that the users are members of the owning groups for the shares and that they are in the passwd and smbpasswd files with the same passwords as on the Win2k
2005 Feb 28
1
[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Won't Start Automatically]]
Actually, my problem turns out to be even more basic and foolish than that. I assumed that since the relevant Kill files were present in the ls listing, then the Start files would be, too. Nope. I had to make those soft links; when I did, everything worked properly. Eric Hines -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Paul Gienger <pgienger@ae-solutions.com> <snip> Date: Sun, 27
2005 Apr 24
3
Samba Shares With only Partial Access
I have a 2Win2k, 1Linux (server) LAN; the server is running FC3 and Samba 3.0.14a. I am unable to get both users access to their individual shares. Essentially, I'm working through the Accounting Office example (pgs 31-35) of John Terpstra's 2004 Samba-3 By Example, and I'm doing something foolish and wrong on a basic level. I can get access to, and manipulate the files in, my
2005 Feb 28
1
Won't Start Automatically
Greetings, Running FC3, kernel 2.6.9-1.667.i686, Samba v 3.0.11. I have been able to guts up Samba by adding a procedure to /etc/rc.d/rc.local, but I can't get the system to start from the /etc/rc.d/rcx.d directories. I have an smb script in /etc/rc.d/init.d that is soft-linked from the rcx.d directories, and that runs just fine when I invoke it from the command line, but apparently the
2005 May 07
1
[Nearly Resolved] Samba-3 by Example, Ex 2.4
OK, I've got this one working, but only by enumerating the valid users in the "files" share--%S wouldn't work in the valid users field (e.g., "smbclient //<servername>/files" would simply give an NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED error). This would be OK for a small LAN, but for small enterprises or LANs with 75-100 users, as some on this list have mentioned, that
2006 Apr 06
1
Fwd: RE: Not able to join domain
Sorry about the direct post.... >Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:38:39 -0500 >To: "Chris Boyd" <Chris.Boyd@usit.ie> >From: Eric Hines <eehines@comcast.net> >Subject: RE: [Samba] Not able to join domain > >At 04/06/06 08:13, you wrote: >>I've tried that and now I get "Access denied" instead "cannot find >>user". Also I'm
2006 Mar 29
1
NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
Hello, I could use a bit of help with a samba install. Installation is Samba 3.0.21c on fedora 4 No major changes to smb.conf just added a share point. [disk] comment = Disk shares path =/disk public = yes writable = yes printable = no guest ok = yes I opened my share up wide. ls -l drwxrwxrwx 10 bob users 1024 Mar 21 16:07 disk I get my share
2005 Dec 02
3
plot and factors
Read R-helpers, I'm relatively new to R and trying to jump in feet first. I've been able to learn a lot from on-line and printed documentation, but here's one question to which I can't find an answer. Well, it's a question with a couple parts. Thanks in advance for any direction (partial or complete) that anyone can provide. I have a data frame with three columns:
2005 Mar 24
1
OS X, exporting graphics, postscript()
Hello everyone, I am new to R, using version 2.0.1 on a Macintosh running OS X 10.3. I am learning how to export graphics to postscript format using the postscript() function, but R is only writing empty files. Yesterday, postscript() was working for me. Today, I don't know what's wrong. Can somebody suggest some things that might fix this problem? Thanks in advance for you help.
2005 Dec 05
1
data frames, na.omit, and sums
Dear R-helpers, New to R, I'm in the middle of a project that I'm using to force me learn R. I'm running into some behavior that I don't understand, and I need some advice. In the last week I've gotten some great advice from the list on visualizing my data, and I was hoping people could help me get over another barrier I've encountered to my progress. Before I
2003 May 16
4
Winxp netlogon script
Hi all, I am having problems running a logon script from a Winxp pro client. It appears that the logon script is not being run at all. Win98 runs the script fine, but none of the Winxp pro clients are currently running it. I am running RedHat 7.1 with Samba version 2.2.7-security-rollup-fix. My smb.conf is as follows: [global] netbios name = LOKKI server string = Lokki PDC
2005 Dec 09
1
Domain group membership.
Hi! All: How can i get domain members of a domain group? I tried getent group, but only get the gid infomation. There isn't member infomation at the last field as local group is. Thanks for your help. Best, LatrellFrom eehines at comcast.net Fri Dec 9 01:43:02 2005 From: eehines at comcast.net (Eric Hines) Date: Fri Dec 9 01:34:48 2005 Subject: [Samba] netlogon problems In-Reply-To:
2007 Sep 08
5
update_va_mapping_otherdomain
Greetings, I have a technical question about update_va_mapping_otherdomain....... I have two components: a C program linked against libxc and a kernel module which performs the following simple sequence of events from domain zero: 1. Pause guest (unprivileged) 2. Grabs the PTE associated with a random (but present) page within the guest''s kernel''s address space (using a
2005 May 01
0
Samba-3 By Example, Example 2.4
I'm running FC3 with Samba v 3.0.14a, and I'm trying to implement Example 2.4 from JHT's 2004 ed. of Samba-3 by Example. I have lserver1 as my Linux box and jupiter (user annlee) and mustelidae (ehines) as Win2k boxes. ehines has access to his share (path /archive/ehines (/archive/%U in smb.conf)), but annlee does not to her share (/archive/annlee). If I add annlee as a valid user
2005 Nov 27
0
RESOLVED: Fwd: Re: Basic Setup Problem
>Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:39:28 -0600 >To: Craig White <craigwhite@azapple.com> >From: Eric Hines <eehines@comcast.net> >Subject: Re: [Samba] Basic Setup Problem > ><snip> >> > >> > 1) your point is valid about the password; I was following the example >> > as exactly as I could. >> > 2) there is no difference between