similar to: Samba LDAP gidNumber=-1 queries?

I downloaded the new 8.3 (tgz format) ldap-tools from IDEALX today. When I run the smbldap-populate script I receive an error that it cannot find the smbldap_tools.pm file. This file was not included in the tar file. If I use the tools file from the samba 3.0.2pre1 distribution it is then expecting the old smbldap_conf.pm file which has now been split in favor of the /etc/smbldap-tools config. I

On 05/06/2019 21:12, Jonathon Reinhart via samba wrote: > All, > > I'm working on a script to automatically assign uidNumber and gidNumber > attributes to users. I have a few questions: > > 1) Which users should be excluded from this assignment? Any you want to be visible to Unix > > I'm currently using this LDAP filter (simplified syntax used here): >

All, I'm working on a script to automatically assign uidNumber and gidNumber attributes to users. I have a few questions: 1) Which users should be excluded from this assignment? I'm currently using this LDAP filter (simplified syntax used here): (objectClass=user) & (objectCategory=Person) & ~(sAMAccountName=krbtgt*) Specifically, based on recent conversations, I'm

Dear list I have been at it for a few day trying to get my SuSE 8.2 server (FREESIDE) to produce a domain (SKOGFARET) for my Windows 2000 Server machine (BABYLON). I use OpenLDAP, and the setup seems to work in most ways, except the vital one [ie. I can mount shares, print, etc...] When I try to add W2K (BABYLON) to the domain, I get the following error: "The following error occured

Any errors atm in syslog and/or messages and the samba logs.   And the interval of the problem, still 5 days?       Gr.   Louis       Van: Oliver Werner [mailto:oliver.werner at kontrast.de] Verzonden: dinsdag 22 maart 2016 11:00 Aan: L.P.H. van Belle CC: samba at lists.samba.org Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Problem with Winbind and Windows Clients   Hi,   now i have tested again

Using Samba 3.0.2pre1 under SuSE 8.2. I have seen several references now in this list noting that the browse for machine accounts in Samba 3 is broken, and 'People' should be used instead. I changed smb.conf to 'ldp machine suffix = ou=People' and I changed smbldap_conf.pm to '$computersou=(People). I then cleared ldap, ran smbldap-populate.pl, and changed the uid of

Hi guys i'm having a problem with connecting a domain memberserver and getting the idmaps to work correctly. I have winbindd running on both so it should be going. Both are linux servers. Here's my deal *Errors:* [2007/07/13 05:29:16, 0] sam/idmap_ldap.c:ldap_get_sid_from_id(269) ldap_get_sid_from_id: mapping not found for gidNumber: 0 [2007/07/13 05:29:16, 0]

Haha, really? :D It should be possible without reboot not? OLIVER WERNER System-Administrator Kontrast Communication Services GmbH Grafenberger Allee 100, 40237 Düsseldorf, Germany Fon +49-211-91505-500 Fax +49-211-91505-530 www.kontrast.de <http://www.kontrast.de/> Amtsgericht Düsseldorf: HRB 26934 Geschäftsführer: Joachim Fischer, Anja Grote-Lutter, Leontine van der Vlist

Yes, thats possible also, but i dont know if thats possible with the KDC settings from samba. I dont use them, If you want, you can set things like in GPO, but normaly not needed imo.   So i suggest, remove the KDC settings, restart the DC?s, reboot the computer and wait what happpens.   Maybe Rowland or an other samba Dev can tell more about the KDC setting, but i can, just dont know,

Guys needing some help with LDAP queries against samba4 this command works against MS AD's LDAP (&(objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(mail=*)(!(userAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))) but with samba4 I get C:\Users\Administrator>dsquery * --filter (&(objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(mail=*)(!(userAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))) I get the

Dear users, We are facing to a big latency issue regarding the LDAP Server (both encrypted & plain). We have a Zarafa mail server which makes a lot of queries and puts a samba process to 100% usage. This latency makes the mail server unusable.. The mail server was previously on OpenLDAP and there was not performance issues. A simple LDAP query can take up to 25 sec to perform !! We

Hi, after we switched to rsyslog with high precision timestamps logcheck did not match the timestamps any more. A patch adding the high precision timestamp format is attached. The rules now match both the traditional timestamp format and the high precision timestamp format (with or without microseconds). Yours sincerely, Ralf D?blitz -- Ralf D?blitz r.doeblitz at asco.de Tel 0531/3906-116

i have now try some other options: - Fresh install of Samba AD Member - rejoin Member - change from winbindd to winbind But nothing helps. Also really slow time ls -lisa /daten/samba/ insgesamt 48 8222 4 drwxrwxrwx 8 postmaster.postmaster kontrast_ws_quack_fischer 4096 Mai 3 15:52 . 2 4 drwxr-xr-x 12 root root 4096 Jan 25 15:30 .. 145 12

No, you have to do that manualy, or look the the samba4 ADS script for kopano ( or zarafa ) But I mostly follow the documentation.   And when i run : time ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b @INDEXLIST .... real    0m0.230s user    0m0.184s sys     0m0.044s   so if yours take more that 20 sec there is something very wrong. I suggest check you samba AD database and

Well, I have tried really hard to get any of the idmaps to work--in that, idmap_ads, idmap_rid, and I have tried to use idmap stroage in ldap with padl (nss_ldap) too, but I have had no luck. If I enable pam in /usr/lib/security/methods.cfg or nss_ldap, I cannot log into the system anymore. If I enable pam in /etc/pam.conf and use in /etc/security/users SYSTEM = "WINBINd or WINBIND[UNAVAIL]

On 6/19/2020 10:00 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > > I take it you mean 'gidNumber' ;-) Sorry, yes you are correct . . . gidNumber. (on Debian 10.4 with Samba 4.12.3) So I did: root at dc01:~# samba-tool group add unixattrs Added group unixattrs root at dc01:~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb cn=Domain\ Users | grep 'gidNumber' root at dc01:~# Still no

This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I did that because I could not change the integer in primaryGroupID wit ldbedt as root. I mapped to to a new attribute called gidNumber which has no specific meaning in samba. Is there any potential problems that can arise from doing that. Is there a better way to fix that problem?

On 23.07.20 15:44, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > gidNumber: 30000 > > Then remove the gidNumber line. my dn "domain users" has also gidNumber: 30000 when i remove it or set it to 512 i get now user via "getent pass <username>" because of the range. but when i set the range to 512 i can not have a local user with id=1000 right?

Le lun. 19 ao?t 2019 ? 12:37, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > On 19/08/2019 11:13, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > > Last important thing. I use some script to manage my users from Linux. > > As I can't use the "id" command to get the user gidNumber on DC : > > > > What is the fastest command to get the user gidNumber

If I run a normal ldapsearch it gives me the gidnumber and uidnumber attributes. It looks like the AD is set up properly. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Urs Golla <urs.golla@gmail.com> Date: Oct 4, 2007 9:47 AM Subject: could not read attribute 'gidNumber' To: samba@lists.samba.org Hi I am using samba 3.0.23c on RHEL5 with security = ads. If I use "idmap