similar to: preserving ownership when copying from Windows to Samba

We are migrating an LTO2 library off Veritas and NTBackup on a Windows Server to a Linux Server with either Bacula or Amanda. Originally, the Windows server used scripts to sync changes from various other Windows servers using Robocopy to a locally attached set of volumes, then ran the backup nightly (Full's were always done). I now had hoped to rsync the Samba shares to a local replica on

Hi all, I'm experiencing a problem when NTBACKING'UP my W2000 Server files against a Linux 2.4.9 + ReiserFS 3.6 file system + Samba share. It works OK for the first 4 Gb's around file size. Then ntbackup stops serving data and the file on the samba side appears to be downsized to 0 and growing ssssslowly. Once you stop ntbackup by killing the process, the file reappears at its real

Hello. We are having a really strange problem and I have been searching the net all day for a answer. We are trying to restore files from NTBackup to a Samba share using alternate pathing in ntbackup. The samba machine is a Solaris 8 machine with Samba 3.0.3 beeing a member of out AD domain. We map the samba share to Y:\ on the XP machine using a named account in AD, with a local

Hi I have a Linux/XFS/Samba that Windows Domain users access through client machines either by UNC or mapped drive. I am trying to work out a backup plan. I would like to use ntbackup to achieve this with Normal (once) and Differential (daily) backups. However, when I run the normal backup the archive checkbox does not get cleared so the differential backup backs up everything again. I have

I'm reposting this problem (perhaps a bug) now I've got more information on it. This is another point of view of the situation and I hope someone could have run into the same trouble before (and solved it :-)) This is it: * with ntbackup 2000 I create a 22Gb .bkf file in the windows machine. * I can copy that file over a samba share and get correct info form the file in windows

Hi all, I experienced the same problem with 3.0.4 that Jeremy and Bruno were discussing - NTBackup unable being to connect to shares and erroring out with 'Access Denied'. I have today upgraded to 3.0.5 (using the Debian Woody packages) and that didn't fix the problem. Was the fix in 3.0.5r1 only applicable to 2000/2003 server? I am stuck in the dark ages of NT 4 here, maybe that is a

Hi all I have a CentOS 4.4 Kernel 2.6.9-11.EL Samba (smbd -V) 3.0.10-1.4E.9 I've been using this server as a small file server recently i needed to do a backup (ntbackup to file) and the backup fails randomly, the largest backup file i managed was about 3GBytes I tried copying large files and randomly the connection is lost I tried with a ping at the same time and the replies don't

Hi All, I have been having problems with the known issue on 3.0.4 with NTBackup and a DFS related issue. Therefore I decided to give 3.0.5rc1 a go, as SuSE have released the rpms on their website. Once I installed the rpms, I found that all daemons started correctly, but all domain authentication failed (I am running a samba server as a member server against a Windows 2000 mixed mode domain).

Hi all I noticed that 3.0.7 is out (another security release)... does this contain the fixes for NtBackup connecting to a share? Currently I have to use ftp to copy the data to the server before backing up... not ideal. Thanks in advance ? Tom Hibbert ??? Technical Specialist ? Phone: +64-9-306-0230 Technical Helpdesk: +64-9-306-0234 Mobile: +64-274-307-784 Email: tom@nsp.co.nz Website:

I have a problem for specific mailbox. In mail.err file I see a lot: Nov 2 07:41:17 s1 dovecot: imap(artur at example.pl): Error: unlink(/var/vmail/example.pl/artur/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache) failed: No such file or directory (in mail-cache.c:28) Nov 2 07:41:17 s1 dovecot: imap(artur at example.pl): Error: Corrupted index cache file /var/vmail/example.pl/artur/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache:

Ok, I will try to do this but should I do some backup of INBOX earlier? 2018-11-02 20:21 GMT+01:00 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi>: > > > On 2 Nov 2018, at 20.58, Poliman - Serwis <serwis at poliman.pl> wrote: > > I have a problem for specific mailbox. In mail.err file I see a lot: > > Nov 2 07:41:17 s1 dovecot: imap(artur at example.pl): Error:

Here is a P2V challenge I could use some advice with. I have a source Windows 2003 physical machine that was upgraded several years ago from Windows 2000. So its system is at C:\WINNT instead of C:\Windows. The target is a RHEV VM. Booting the source machine from the virt-p2v CD and trying virt-p2v-server fails apparently because the Windows directory is c:\WINNT. What about the

I have strange problem. In last Friday I had a problem with dovecot. It didn't see directories with mailboxes in /var/vmail. Somehow it crashed because probably two things (a lot of this type of lines in mail.err file): *Nov 23 07:05:02 s1 dovecot: lda(poli at poli.li <poli at poli.li>): Error: User initialization failed: Initializing mail storage from mail_location setting failed:

Hi Peter, Thanks for the reply. I agree that the base class vtable may be not referenced by a derived class. However, the vtable of a derived class has to reference its parent type_info, and so having type_info internalized means that the class is final, doesn’t it? Thanks, Nikolai From: Peter Collingbourne [mailto:peter at pcc.me.uk] Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 4:36 AM To: Gainullin,

pon., 26 lis 2018 o 09:25 Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> napisa?(a): > > On 26.11.2018 10.01, Poliman - Serwis wrote: > > I have strange problem. In last Friday I had a problem with dovecot. It > didn't see directories with mailboxes in /var/vmail. Somehow it crashed > because probably two things (a lot of this type of lines in mail.err file): > *Nov 23

> On 29 Sep 2016, at 21:01, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Hi Artur, > > Artur Pilipenko wrote: > > > BTW, do we really need to emit an atomic load if all the individual > > components are bytes? > > Depends -- do you mean at the at the hardware level or at the IR > level? > > If you mean at the IR level, then I

Hello find /etc -size -1G should return all files less than 1Giga byte in /etc, but return a list of empty file (size=0) find /etc -size -2G work fine and return all the files This works the same on my fedora11 and my centos 5 ! Did I miss something or is it a bug ? Regards -- Alain Spineux | aspineux gmail com Your email 100% available |

If we do load combining at the IR level, one thing we'll need to give some thought to is atomicity.  Combining two atomic loads into a wider (legal) atomic load is not a reversible transformation given our current specification. I've been thinking about a concept I've been tentatively calling "element wise atomicity" which would make this a reversible transform by

Ok, thanks. Are there any plans to reintroduce it on the IR level? I'm not confident this is strictly necessary, but in some cases not having load widening ends up really bad. Like in the case where vectorizer tries to do something about it: https://godbolt.org/z/60RuEw https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42708 At the current state I'm forced to use memset() to express uint64 load from

> On 29 Sep 2016, at 03:23, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Hi Artur, > > Artur Pilipenko via llvm-dev wrote: > > One of the arguments for doing this earlier is inline cost > > perception of the original pattern. Reading i32/i64 by bytes look much > > more expensive than it is and can prevent inlining of interesting > >