similar to: delete readonly

hi all, i have problems with windows clients (XP). i want files with readonly flag to not be allowed to delete delete readonly = no ...works with linux clients but on windows you can delete files anyway. i'll be thankful for any hint greetings, rado.

Hi Apologies if this is a FAQ, I've tried Googling... I'm trying to set up CD-RCS on Windows boxes talking to our Linux Server (Samba 3.0.10-1.fc1.1.legacy). Apparently, the way this works is that it needs to be able to delete files that are read-only and not owned by you; they recommend that you set "delete readonly = yes" in the config file. The problem is that this

I have an [apps] share that was intended to be read-only (to keep viruses away) however some Windows programs require rw access to specific files. I don't want to open-up everything on the share to rw, only those specific files/directories that need 'w' access. Here's the dilemma: In order for users to be able to change a file, the file and directory it's in need to have rw

I am using a .bat logon script (the same for all users) and it avoids that I have to configure each user manually. But now I have to run a command that requires administrator rights on two files, and the command I write in the .bat file doesn't work. Do you know how to run the logon script as the local machine Administrator? After all, the logon script is on the server and only me can

We have a directory where only one person can enter, but there is a file inside which needs to be accessed by other people (that person doesn't want to put that file in a common directory). I have found that if I make a hard link to that file it can be accessed, if the hard link and the directory where it lies have the right permissions. But hard links have a problem, they get

We have a Samba server which acts mainly as file server, but we want it to resolve host names for local machines. I have written some IP-hostname lines both in /etc/hosts and /etc/samba/lmhosts, and I have "wins support = yes" in smb.conf, but then from a Windows client I try to ping one of those hosts and it can't resolve the address. I have tried some combinations of

I declare some checkboxes : <%= check_box_tag ''offers[]'', offer.id , @params[:offers].include?(offer.id.to_s) ,:readonly=>true %> the result is : <input checked="checked" id="offers[]" name="offers[]" readonly="readonly" type="checkbox" value="1" /> But readonly doesn''t work ??? -- Posted

Fellow List Members: After upgrading our server to RHEL 6 from RHEL 5, I discovered that our linux clients could create files on the share but not delete them unless they first switch to root (su -). This is very odd to me since the share in question is mounted with the non-root user's credentials. The fstab entry is as follows: //192.168.1.2/officefiles /mnt/officefiles cifs

Hi I am trying to Run AsteriskNow 1.5 which uses Centos 5.3 Distribution with Readonly Root Filesytem. Right now if I shutdown the system abrupty or there is power failure linux kernel doesn't not boot "Kernel panic" and other short of issues.prb due to corrupted files. Thats why i want to make root filesystem as read-only and placing some directories /var and /etc/asterisk etc as

I have a Samba server with Windows XP clients, and roaming profiles for every user. At this moment everyone can log onto any workstation, but it shouldn't be like that: there are some workstations where anyone can log into, but three of them should be restricted to some specific users. I thought about making local users for them, but we need all users to have roaming profiles, I can't

We have a third party application that tracks its own licensing through a special file it creates. We just recently moved this application (along with all of our other user data) from a Win2K server to a Samba 3.0.20 server. This application no longer works correctly. What the application is doing is creating the lock file when first lauched by a user and then setting the DOS ReadOnly attribute.

This completes the read only rootfs, all needed writable directories are in the tmpfs. Signed-off-by: Joey Boggs <jboggs at redhat.com> --- common-post.ks | 12 ++++++++++++ ovirt-node-image.ks | 1 + 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/common-post.ks b/common-post.ks index 0c0a3f4..44a0270 100644 --- a/common-post.ks +++ b/common-post.ks @@ -146,3

Hello Is there a way to mount a directory as readonly when using LXC with libvirt? Something like: <filesystem type="mount"> <source dir="/sw/py27/python2.7_x86_64"/> <target dir="/opt//py27"/> <readonly/> </filesystem> The documentation says

On 08/03/2015 18:07, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Nicholas Chapman > <admin at indigorenderer.com <mailto:admin at indigorenderer.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > I have identified what seems to be a limitation of LLVM with > regard to marking 'sret functions' as pure/readonly. > > For some context - I have

Hi All, I was checking the access rights and a problem (hence a question) appeared: Who can delete a file through Samba ? Suppose we have the following situation: drwxrwxrwx john finance directory -rw-r--r-- jack finance directory/file Under unix everyone can delete the file. Under Samba, the documentation says (due to the Windows sementic) you also need the write access to the

Hey all, I was doing some investigation of LICM and I ran into something that seems a bit odd to me. Suppose I was looking at the following code snippet: #define N 1000 int main() { int B[N]; char A[N]; for(int i=0; i<N; i++) { B[i] = strlen(A); } return B[0]+B[N-1]; } Among other optimizations that I may want to happen, I'd hope that the call to strlen could be

Are there any rationalies to make queries obtained by joining scope to be readonly? I read some old posts (pre-rails3) that joins adds additional columns to record so that ActiveRecord doesn''t know how to update that fields, but actually I don''t see that fields. For example I write model class Order < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :executors, class_name:

On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 16:55:08 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Since qemu 2.10, qemu locks all drives even when they are opened > readonly. This disables this locking in this safe case. > > Incomplete fix for > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417306 > --- I guess that, according to the other message in this thread, the commit message will be amended to use

I have a Samba server which I set so that Windows clients have roaming profiles. It works but when the user logs off, his personal folder in C:\Documents and Settings remains there, although i created the key DeleteRoamingCache (as a DWORD) in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\WinLogon and set it to 1. It seems a problem with the Windows client, but I'm not

On 6/21/12 2:23 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi John, > >> Are functions marked as readnone or readonly in the LLVM IR allowed to >> generate output or to exhibit exceptional behavior (e.g., calling >> abort(), generating an MMU fault, etc.)? > they are allowed to unwind exceptions for example, since in theory this > can occur without scrunching externally visible memory