similar to: Samba 3.0.21a and AIX 5.3 - Cannot see server on network

On 11/07/15 04:06, Lee Brown wrote: > Hi Everyone, my first foray into Samba and AD both. > > Not sure if this is an OS or configuration problem. I've found similar > issues, but nothing either recent enough (is related to samba 3) or close > enough. > > FreeBSD-10.1-RELENG, Samba 4.2.2. > > I have the domain provisioned as rfc2307 > I have joined a Win7-virtual

On 11/07/15 10:16, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 11/07/15 04:06, Lee Brown wrote: >> Hi Everyone, my first foray into Samba and AD both. >> >> Not sure if this is an OS or configuration problem. I've found similar >> issues, but nothing either recent enough (is related to samba 3) or >> close >> enough. >> >> FreeBSD-10.1-RELENG, Samba 4.2.2.

Hi Everyone, my first foray into Samba and AD both. Not sure if this is an OS or configuration problem. I've found similar issues, but nothing either recent enough (is related to samba 3) or close enough. FreeBSD-10.1-RELENG, Samba 4.2.2. I have the domain provisioned as rfc2307 I have joined a Win7-virtual machine to the domain I have created a new user with ADUC I have assigned 10000 to

Hello, I've been trying to get a solution (or at least an explanation) from the FreeBSD guys at freebsd-questions lists, but I guess no one knew the answer. I am trying to run Samba 3 (latest) in a FreeBSD 7.0 jail (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeBSD_Jail). It seems I cannot convince Samba to answer NetBIOS broadcast requests and therefore Windows machines cannot browse it directly by name

Hello, I have been using FreeBSD-7.0STABLE with BIND-9.4.2 ( i guess, forget to check before upgrade) up to 2008-01-26 (yesterday). But after upgrade FreeBSD-7.0STABLE-->FreeBSD-7.1STABLE everything goes wrong. 1.BIND can't start anymore and giving me following message at /var/log/messages: . . . Jan 27 12:30:20 ns kernel: ad4: 152587MB <WDC WD1600AAJS-75PSA0 05.06H05> at

>Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:04:02 -0800 (PST) >From: Nash Nipples <trashy_bumper@yahoo.com> >To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: IPFW: Blocking me out. How to debug? > >Dear W.D. > >oh come on. i have the same problem. Which problem are we talking about? cut and paste problem. >cut and paste logic: > >#!/bin/sh >#1. count packets >#2.

Hi, i've got this problem with my jail and i'm abolutly lost as in the why of it. I previously posted this on comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc but i was advised to send here I was unable to find help on google :( To resume quick, when i'm in a jail, netstat doesn't work properly. Hopefully i have provided sufficient information for anyone willing to help me :p First of all, my system :

Hello all, After upgrading to 3.0.23c on my FreeBSD 6.1 box Samba stopped working on any connections. When connecting to smbd, tcp session is established (SYN, SYN+ACK, ACK) then a client send a NEGOTIATION packet, and after some timeout (about 10-15 seconds) this tcp session is closed (by the client) because no response to NEG. packet was received. Then after 75 seconds (counting from the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm using tinc to connect a couple of ipv6 capable machines using a mix of upd6, udp4, tcp6 and tcp4. Now I wanted to add an linux embedded device, which has no ipv6 support at all. Tinc did compile and configuration is fine (tested on other machine), but after connecting the embedded device to other hosts tinc instances, it suddenly crashes.

Samba, (smbd version 3.0.20) has been working splendidly on my machine for more than four years. It has run without a hitch. And then suddenly, today, it has stopped working. I haven't changed anything, I haven't installed anything on the server and I haven't removed anything. So I'm at a loss to know what's wrong with it. I can only interact with the server from the local

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> > Commit 23b2707 should resolve this. Please > let me know if you need > test binaries > > -- > -Gene > <<< > > > 1) About the Service Binding protocols, PXE protocol, etc having the same handle# is clear if we > see that the number is in fact

>>> Commit 23b2707 should resolve this.? Please let me know if you need test binaries -- -Gene <<< 1) About the Service Binding protocols, PXE protocol, etc having the same handle# is clear if we see that the number is in fact the "Device Handle" supporting all those protocols. (clearly said at UEFI_Driver_Writer_Guide_V1.0.1_120308.pdf) 2) about your

>>> It's a handle to the device that loaded Syslinux, in this case a NIC plus IP-stack (IPv4 or IPv6). <<< Yes it is the handle of the device (NIC) that loaded syslinux plus IP stack (as you said) but also all the attached Service Binding Protocols, PXE Protocol, and some more. All of them sharing the same device handle. >>> > 2.2) > I think

Hi, I've a question about a problem using a samba share in a UNIX AIX server. In my scenarious there is a fileNET server (running on a win2000 server) which use a samba share on a AIX sever for cacheing file, this share is configured for allow access to a particular user (pangol). It seams that user have access permission but an error is returned when fileNET try to write a file. Thanks in

Here is a re-post of PR#19365 which was originally post back in Aug.. If anyone can help I am still looking for a solution ! Forwarded message: > > Hi Jeremy ! > > Don't know if you remember this one but it is definetely turning > my hair grey :) I have left your original reply at the end. > > I finally have a configuration which works with Bentley's >

Hi All, I am running squid as reverse proxy on FreeBSD 7.0-R amd64. After running for a while (~ 8 hours), the throughput degrades to very very low rate. I found the squid is in "zoneli" state and is already a bug report on http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=106317 But after more investigation, I found there are lots of TCP Connections in FIN_WAIT_1 and never close. # netstat

Hi all Bear with me on this one... We have a problem connecting to a specific port via Oracle TNSPING There are two PC's in our office that are on the same network as the server (i.e. my desktop PC can not get to the server) The server has multiple network interfaces, the primary is a gigabit fibre card on IP xx.16. The secondary is a megabit card on IP xx.80 The tnsping command fails

Greetings, I have installed Dovecot under FreeBSD 5_3 It is pretty impressive. I got SSL working with no problem for both imap and pop3. Besides that I do still want to chroot Dovecot. I noticed that there are some options in the dovecot.conf that are intended for this. Unfortunately online resources on how to do that can't be found on google. Although I'm running the server as user

Heya.. By reading my /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf, I can find out that my Apache is running as the user "www" and the group "www" .. Yet, when I run sockstat, it tells me one of the forks are runned as root and listening on port 80 as well as the other forks are runned by www:www.. If I got a lot of users connecting to my server on port 80, will thier requests ever be

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Geoff Galitz <geoff at galitz.org> wrote: > > > > Should it be running, or not? > > > > > > >root at mercury:[~]$ netstat -ap --inet | grep rpc > > >tcp 0 0 *:sunrpc *:* > LISTEN 6458/portsentry > > >udp 0 0 localhost:filenet-rpc localhost:filenet-rpc