similar to: Read-only for everyone else

One of the benefits of living in Silicon Valley is the SVLUG Linux users group. You meet the most interesting people there :-). I met someone from Rational software who has the ability to contact the product manager for Clearcase. I told him about the number of Clearcase customers who would like Rational to support Clearcase running against a Samba fileserver (as they've asked the Samba Team

Gerald, No worries. This patch is required if your using Rational ClearCase and you don't want everyone to have access to it. It's to fix a brokenness (IMO) within ClearCase, and maybe other programs. Our windows primary group has 10k+ users... I will shoot it off to Rational, so they can provide it to there customers. I was hoping it could be applied to the main tree so I could just

Is there anyone out there successfully using Rational Clearcase with SAMBA? Was there any special changes you had to make to get it to work? We were told by Rational specifically not to use SAMBA and wanted to get the other side. TIA Paul Gilles Navigation Technologies -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef

Hi - I'm getting timouts trying to access us1.samba.org or I'd look through the archives first. Anyone currently supporting any versions of Rational's ClearCase/samba/UNIX/NT? We are currently running samba v2.0.3 on both HP-UX 11.0 (vob server) and Solaris 2.5.1 (view server). Rational ClearCase v3.2.1 on the two UNIX and NT Workstation 4 (some SP3, some SP4) We currently support

This falls under the 'getting clearcase to work with samba' category. Does anybody know if the clearcase albd server actually uses samba to access files (or anything else) on the unix side? I am having 'discussions' with rational (the clearcase people). The nt user running clearcase to access some unix-side views connects to the unix side using a set of credentials that have

Andrew, Thank you for your suggestions. The real problem is Rational Technical support. When you pay someone 100k+ they tend to look for any excuse to deem you "unsupported". If you don't have your default group set to the clearcase user group, then technical support will decide that thats where your problem is! I am sure you know how that goes... I have solved problems

Hello there- I hope you do not mind this email, as I am trying to reach a talented ClearCase professional. I am a business development manager for a technical consulting form called ettain group, and hope you will peruse the description below. In the event that Jacksonville is not a market of interest to you, please feel free to make any suggestions of how I can locate talented ClearCase

I installed Samba recently on a ClearCase server (Solaris 8) to remove the need for DiskAccess on the Windows clients. I'm having two problems with it, actually. The important one that I'm asking the list about is that Samba is hammering my NIS master with requests for DoMaiN+UseR (and every conceivable combination of cases--note + instead of \, per winbind separator statement in

Hello, I am Shashidhar SR Working for Siemens Communication Software in Bangalore, INDIA as a Configuration Manager for Clearcase. I need some help regarding the samba configuration at our site. First Let me Explain our Environment: - We are Using samba 2.2.8a on Solaris 9. - We are using samba as an interop from Solaris 9 box to winnt/w2k/win-xp clients. - On Solaris we have installed IBM

Hello, I am Shashidhar SR Working for Siemens Communication Software in Bangalore, INDIA as a Configuration Manager for Clearcase. I need some help regarding the samba configuration at our site. First Let me Explain our Environment: - We are Using samba 2.2.8a on Solaris 9. - We are using samba as an interop from Solaris 9 box to winnt/w2k/win-xp clients. - On Solaris we have installed IBM

Hello Samba, We tried to use samba-2.2.4-1 with Rational ClearCase and had a problem using WinBind. ClearCase requires the primary group id to be set to the clearcase users group. WinBind sets the primary group to something like DOMAIN_GROUP_RID_USERS. I am including the patch we made to samba-2.2.4 to get things working. I have added two new smb.conf options: winbind primary group //

I have tried Samba 3.0.2a and 3.0.4. We use Active directory. The server is running on RHEL3. When I connect to the server on a share that is acutally an ext3 or NFS file system, I have no known problems. We use ClearCase on Linux and I am trying to access my workspace (view) as I have done many times before on Solaris, but now we are running on Linux and with a newer version of ClearCase

Hi, Does Samba 2.2.4 on Solaris 8 support 64 bit? We are using Clearcase & Rational told us that only samba 2.2.5 support 64 bit? Any help would be arreciated. Thanks, -Murali

Hi All ! i?m running Clearcase (IBM Rational) and have some strange problems ... when i use Samba ver 3.21b i can?t access the samba share by name (\\servername\sambashare) but i can access it on ip (\\192.168.1.100\sambashare\) i?m running debug level 10 and it seems like it can?t authenticate when access on netbios/dns/host name but on ip it can ? when running samba ver 3.23b from

Good morning, I have a problem and I am unsure whether it's anything to do with Samba. We use Samba on HP-Unix in conjunction with a product from rational called clearcase. Occasionally from getting to our NT Desktops to our Unix environment Powerbuilder Files( which are binary files) get reduced down to 0 size, this gets saved and we end up losing our work. I am not expecting you to solve

Hello, I realize that AIX 4.3.3 is a very old platform, but we have one such system which cannot be upgraded and requires Samba. We are currently using Samba 2.2.1a (!) and I'd like to upgrade to something more modern. This system participates in a Clearcase environment and we are trying to share an MVFS filesystem. Users complain that it takes a very long time (5+ minutes) to access this

nmbd is already running unfortnately... i can say that when running samba version 3.11 on Solaris it is working also with 3.23... ???? thanks for your suggestion tough ! /J > Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:59:17 +0700> From: garasi9@gmail.com> To: jflory@aeiconsultants.com> Subject: Re: [Samba] Re: can?t access share by name, but on ip> CC: samba@lists.samba.org> > Hi...>

Background: This situation is using Rational ClearCase in a situation with server on Solaris 10 and clients on a mixture of Windows XP and Windows 7, with access to the VOB (repository) enabled via Samba version: 3.4.9 Users are getting a consistent error with a specific ClearCase operation (Add to Source Control), which we have traced to a Samba interaction. The issue: For the interaction

I'm hoping this turns into another case of 'knowing it works makes it happen.' I am involved with a unix clearcase installation which now needs to work with nt. We have clearcase 3.2.1 running on both the unix and nt side. Because we have checkin/checkout triggers hooked to some unix-side stuff, we need the unix views to be accessible from nt. Does anyone have direct experience

Hello, We are using Samba to connect our ClearCase server to the Windows environment. Our original configuration was one server hosting all our VOBs and Views. We have Samba configured to allow mapping of shares to our ClearCase Windows Clients. Everything was working fine. Now we have set up a second server to host all our Views separate from the VOBs. So we have a View server and a separate VOB