similar to: what to do in worst case scenario: samba pdc not available

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "what to do in worst case scenario: samba pdc not available"

2007 Feb 19
1
lock account after failed logins
Hi, does anybody know how I can lock down an samba domain account after a certain amount of failed logins? I thought I heard that this issue will be solved with Samba 3? Thanks a lot and best regards Martin Miethe
2006 Oct 20
2
the worst scenario of ext3 after abnormal powerdown
Hi, I have seen and heard many cases of ext3 corrupted after abnormal powerdown (e.g. missing all the files in one directory). yes, UPS should help, but wonder what kind of worst scenario will ext3 present after powerdown. messed up meta data has been seen in many cases, for example, the in-direct block of one inode contains garbage, which causes the automatic fsck failed to work and user has
2009 Jun 15
2
Dovecot v1.2 assert() in ACL
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, using Dovecot v1.2 changeset: 9126:b745911012bb ACL config: acl = vfile # To let users LIST mailboxes shared by other users, Dovecot needs a # shared mailbox dictionary. For example: acl_shared_dict = file:/var/cache/dovecot/shared-mailboxes telnet localhost imap 0 login .... 1 getacl Sent * ACL "Sent"
2006 Jan 18
2
deployment of software
I have Samba and about 40 WinXP Clientes running. Now I?m trying to find a way to deploy software (for example updates of E-Mail Client, Windows Patches) to my Clients. I was playing around with AutoIt and some "switch-user-tools" for windows, which really works but also is kind of complicated and time consuming. In my environment, every user got his own Logonscript on the Linuxserver
2009 Feb 18
1
v1.2 can't set ACL to empty string
Hi *, according to RfC4314 the rights argument to the setacl command might be an empty string ("zero right characters"): The third argument is a string containing an optional plus ("+") or minus ("-") prefix, followed by zero or more rights characters. existing clients (horde in particular) actually use this to remove all rights from an user. Currently
2007 Jan 25
4
vesamenu.c32 and cat.c32
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have done some additional testing, and gotten it a bit close to what I was looking for. I had to modify the cat.c to eliminate the printing of the arguments and file name, and added a Press Enter to return menu line. With the below isolinux.cfg the options do display the files, and pressing enter than returns to the vesamenu. DEFAULT
2011 Sep 11
1
setacl on complete mailbox
Hi List, how can I grant a user full control on another mailbox (the complete mailbox with all folder and subfolders). With the setacl command I could do this but first I have to list all folders and then I have to do one setacl command for each folder. Is there a command to this in one line? Also for new created folders? Greetz, Tobias
2014 Feb 20
2
Why are ACLs for non-existent mailboxes accepted?
Dovecot 2.2.9-1 accepts SETACL commands that share mailboxes to non-existent mailboxes. There is no error message. Is this intended behavior? I think it's bad because clients present a success message when indeed the intent of the user failed. Typos are hard to catch.
2018 Aug 07
2
limit sharing ability to certain users
still the same? root at buserver:/etc/dovecot# doveadm user test2 at onnet.ch field valueuserdb lookup: user test2 at onnet.ch doesn't exist relevant config output from doveconf -n userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf driver = ldap result_success = continue-ok } userdb { args = username_format=%Lu /etc/dovecot/share.passwd driver = passwd-file result_failure =
2009 Jun 25
3
Dovecot v1.2 ACL shared-boxes users in SQL, how to remove entries?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I noticed that entries added to the ACL dict are not removed, when an user no longer has explicit ACLs to another user, e.g.: [at the beginning no ACLs for "user"] 1 login testuser pwd 2 setacl INBOX user lp 3 deleteacl INBOX user Although "user" has no ACLs of mailfolders of "testuser", the user-testuser
2008 Dec 10
2
dovecot 1.2 Alpha4 shared folders
Hi, I'm trying to setup shared folders with alpha4 but didn't succeed until now. Here is my dovecot -n : # 1.2.alpha4: /etc/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.26.5 i686 Mandriva Linux 2009.0 base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/
2013 Feb 26
1
2.2.rc2: problem with acl_shared_dict
Hello, 2.2.rc2, configuration as before: acl_shared_dict=file:... The contents of this file is used for e.g. LISTing shared mailboxes. But even with file and directory beeing world writable, it's not written into on SETACL commands. Instead, at least sometimes (it seems to make a difference if GETACL is used before in the session) the imap process crashes on SETACL or DELETEACL. Feb 26
2011 Jun 27
1
ACLs: Group ACL adds empty ACL for user of same name, why?
I'm playing around with ACLs, Groups and SOGo on Debian Stable, Dovecot 1.2.15. If I set an ACL for a group 'developers': 6 setacl "INBOX.Trash" "$developers" "lrsw" 6 OK Setacl complete. The dovecot-acl file for INBOX.Trash then contains a group setting for the group, and a user setting for a user of the same name, giving it no permissions.
2013 Nov 28
2
shared folder - ACL
Hello everyone, I've trying to configure shared folders in dovecot 2.1.6 without success. My configuration is: mail_plugins = quota autocreate mail_log notify acl ... plugin { ... acl_shared_dict = file:/etc/dovecot/shared-mailboxes.db ... } Protocol imap { ... mail_plugins = imap_quota imap_acl ... } When I try to set acl to a folder: a02 setacl inbox.test1 user1 lr a02 BAD Error
2009 Jan 15
2
get username of logged in user
Hello, can I anywhere get the name of the currently logged in user? I'm still implementing a custom ACL plugin (IMAP commands MYRIGHTS, GETACL, SETACL, DELETEACL), and for some functions (for example storing the current folder's ACL in combination with this username) I need to obtain the currently logged in IMAP user. Is this possible? If yes - how? Thanks in advance. Best regards
2010 Jan 22
1
format of file dict
For shared (between users) mailboxes, I am using a file dict. plugin { acl_shared_dict = file:/etc/dovecot/acl_shared_dict/shared.db } What is the format of this file? I would like to manage it directly rather than have SETACL update it. I see lines which describe a sharing entry (the format of those looks obvious) but also lines with just a '1'. Do I just need to separate entries
2011 Sep 13
4
imapc and imap_acl
Hello (Timo), yes, I know... maybe it's a bit far fetched, but I do have a use case. Would it be (reasonably easily) possible to implement IMAP ACL support for "imported" imapc namespaces/mailboxes? There is no local directory (like with the virtual plugin) yet... Greetings, Lutz -- Lutz Pre?ler <Lutz.Pressler at SerNet.DE> http://www.SerNet.DE/ SerNet Service
2010 Mar 18
1
Shared mailboxes basics
Hello Timo, I'm trying to set up shared mailboxes with dovecot-1.2.11/Maildir. I previsouly used public namespaces with 1.1+ to somehow implement them but I'm looking at the real ones now. I've read the Wiki but I'm still confused or not 100% sure about the following (basic) points : 1. Namespaces prefixes My understanding is that a namespace prefix is just an escape mechanism
2009 Apr 07
2
Is there any more detailed docs about dict configuration
Hi, I am looking for some help on dict configration. I'm trying to config shared and public mailbox, and use sql as acl backend. Here is my config: table: CREATE TABLE `shared_dict` ( `id` int(10) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `from_user` char(50) NOT NULL, `to_user` char(50) NOT NULL, `status` int(10) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1', PRIMARY KEY (`id`), KEY `from_user` (`from_user`),
2014 Feb 21
1
Why SETACL accepts non-existant users (was Re: Why are ACLs for non-existent mailboxes accepted?)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Boris wrote: > On Thursday 20 February 2014 20:45:32 Boris wrote: >> Dovecot 2.2.9-1 accepts SETACL commands that share mailboxes to non-existent >> mailboxes. There is no error message. Is this intended behavior? There is a "false friend" here. A "mailbox" in the tongue of many English