similar to: network share from samba slow over vpn

When I launch ssh sessions from xterms and exit them via the command line, the processes go away, but if I just kill the xterm window an ssh was launched from via a mouse click, the ssh.exe hangs around taking up system resources until I kill it via the task manager, if I can figure out which ssh.exes are the zombies. The same problem *does not* occur from a simple bash shell window (launched via

I recently set up a Samba server (3.0.24-6etch9) on my debian etch system. While accessing its shares through 1GBit Ethernet with a Windows XP SP2 client there's some real odd behavior: In one direction (uploading files from WinXP -> debian) the speed is just great, no matter what, around 35MiB/s. In the other direction (downloading a file WinXP <- debian) it idles at around 120KiB/s

Hi, How would I go about troubleshooting this: [Dec 24 07:15:11] WARNING[5228]: chan_sip.c:3397 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on transmission a50346a4-bfdc32ed at 192.168.1.95 for seqno 101 (Critical Response) -- See doc/sip-retransmit.txt. [Dec 24 07:15:12] WARNING[5228]: chan_sip.c:3397 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on transmission 90bd2c4d-aaaec88 at 192.168.1.95 for seqno 101

Hello lartc, Testing some rules I found out that any rules are slowing down large pings! For example: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100Mbit prio 1 ceil 100Mbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 100Mbit prio 2 ceil 100Mbit tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 5 u32 \ match ip src 10.10.10.1 \ match ip

I am running a Xen HVM guest with netfront PV drivers. This is running SLES10 SP3 inside the guest. The Dom0 is also SLES10 SP3. Now I am trying to communicate from that HVM guest to a Windows Visa or also Windows 7 machine and I am getting really poor TCP performance. When tracing on the network traffic, I can see that no packets are dropped or missing or anything, but what happens is that the

I have an asterisk system in Costa Rica that connects to a SIP provider in Atlanta. Sometimes SIP packets seem get dropped or retransmitted too quickly. In trying to debug this I turned on SIP debug in Asterisk and the SIP provider enabled packet capture on his end. What I saw was me sending an invite, them sending a 100 Trying, me sending a cancel, me sending a retransmit of the cancel, me

I have tried installing many of the beta versions and most of the release versions of 1.8. I have 3 SIP phones which we use for all our calls. After installing 1.8 the first thing I try is calling out port one of my Digium TDM04 back into port 2. I can see that the call comes in and tries to call all three SIP phones but the phones never ring. Eventually the call goes to voice mail and these

Hello. I have Samba on Ibex running over VPN, and am having problems with speed reading and writing from XP and 7 boxes. It takes, for example, 16 minutes to transfer four files for a total of 1.2MB. I assume that this problem is due to SMB block size and the latency I'm dealing with, always between 200 and 500ms. How can I properly configure client and server to negotiate a suitable

Hello everybody. I have a problem with an integration between an Asterisk (1.4.24.1) on FreeBSD 7.0 and a Shoretel 7.5 server. To make a very long story short, when someone behind asterisk call an extension behing shoretel everything work as expected. When someone behing the shoretel server call someone behind asterisk the first 10 seconds of the call seems ok but then the line is dropped

when I make a call to the pstn it shows me this error: aximum retries exceeded on transmission 9d4a24f8-b673756b at 192.168.10.19 for seqno 102 (Critical Response) -- See doc/sip-retransmit.txt. [Apr 11 20:35:34] WARNING[3169]: chan_sip.c:1998 retrans_pkt: Hanging up call 9d4a24f8-b673756b at 192.168.10.19 - no reply to our critical packet (see doc/sip-retransmit.txt). bug? voicemail same

>> Isn't an SSL based tunnel all TCP? > Not in the case of OpenVPN. I'm not sure about the commercial > offerings. Correct. My recollection is that OpenSSL uses TCP for the setup and management of the tunnel (e.g. authentication and key exchange) and uses UDP to carry the actual payload... each tunneled IP packet is wrapped in a UDP datagram. That way, the UDP transport

What might be the possible causes of an smbclient NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME error? smbclient generates this error when I attempt to connect to my [homes] share from a Mandrake Linux 10.1 (Samba 3.0.7) box to my Fedora Core 4 box (Samba 3.0.14a-2). Similarly, my Windows 2000 machine complains that folder "\\Fedora\derek is not accessible. The network name cannot be found." I can

Hi, Maybe this is just a newbie question. I am trying to inspect VMware images with guestfish. I am running Fedora 15 in a VSphere VM. Once Fedora is installed I do: yum update yum install '*guestf*' Then I run guesfish on a copy of a Fedora 15 disk. guestfish -rw -I -a Fedora15-2-disk1.vmdk with the following result: libguestfs: error: unexpected end of file

Hello list, I am confronted with the following problem : making a call only leasts for about 30 seconds, then the call is ended. The CLI shows : [May 21 14:31:50] WARNING[25345]: chan_sip.c:1980 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on transmission 954539948-5060-2 at 192.168.1.100 for seqno 11 (Critical Response) -- See doc/sip-retransmit.txt. [May 21 14:31:50] WARNING[25345]:

What is the problem with SIP retransmits? ----------------------------------------- Sometimes you get messages in the console like these: - "retrans_pkt: Hanging up call XX77yy - no reply to our critical packet." - "retrans_pkt: Cancelling retransmit of OPTIONs" The SIP protocol is based on requests and replies. Both sides send requests and wait for replies.

I have asterisk 1.6.2.11 talking to a cisco 1760 running ipvoicek9-mz.124-25b. whenever a call goes through the 1760's FXO or FXS (in or out) there is a 915 second maximum call time due to asterisk hanging up the call because of a "critical packet" being missed. I read doc/sip-retransmit.txt and I don't see anything there that is helpful to my situation - the asterisk box is

I'm trying to debug a NAT issue and I can't make up my mind if the problem is with my Vigor 2800 or Asterisk 1.6.2. I know the Draytek is alleged to suffer from nat 'issues' but I did not have the issue with 1.6.1 - so I'm wondering if something has changed? The Draytek offers 'NAT & Routed' on a single device - so my Asterisk sits on a Public IP, and I have a

se?ores alguien le ha presentado este problema al acceder al voicemail o al hacer una llamada a la pstn 1940> Playing 'vm-received' (language 'es') -- <SIP/111-08d91940> Playing 'digits/yesterday' (language 'es') -- <SIP/111-08d91940> Playing 'digits/at' (language 'es') -- <SIP/111-08d91940> Playing

Hello, I'm a long term samba user through many different flavors from FreeBSD to Linux. My latest is using Ubuntu 16.04 with its older version of the 4.2 series of samba as an AD DC and separate 4.2 series file server. In my small test environment the Samba 4.2 AD DC and the Samba 4.2 file server are different LXC containers on the same host. I've worked through many of the

I've got a very odd situation occurring. I recently upgraded to Samba 2.0.26a and now secondary group membership doesn't work. On the filesystem I have this layout /derek /derek/Folder 1 /derek/Folder 2 derek has these ACLs # file: derek # owner: root # group: root user::rwx group::r-x other:r-x Folder 1 has these ACLs # file: Folder 1 # owner: root # group: g1 user::rwx group:rwx