similar to: "Well-known Windows RIDs" vs. UIDs/GIDs

Good {morning,afternoon,evening} everybody, A while ago I wrote to the list asking about whether the uidNumber/gidNumber of the "commonly-known SIDs" had to match the RID of the SID; the answer was "no". I asked because I intended to implement multiple NT4/Samba domains using a single LDAP tree; each Samba PDC/BDC instance would only use the relevant subset of the tree.

Hey all, I'm doing some Kerberos stuff at work, and I'm thinking it'd be nice if dovecot had GSSAPI support. I found http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2004-July/004039.html (thanks Colin :), but it's a long ways away from applying to the current stable tree. I'm wondering - has anybody else been keeping a local copy of this patch up to date? Thanks, Dave -- Arguing

Hey there, I am, for the first time, playing around with Samba seriously (mainly thinking about replacing NFS with it). I'm using a Linux 2.6.x client with the cifs.ko kernel module/filesystem type. I've found that I can't change the permissions on files to arbitrary values; they must not be greater than the bits specified in 'create mask' (and friends). The problem appears

Hello all, I have following situation: There are users that don't have the well-known RID 513, so groupmapping like Domain Users (S-1-5-21-<domain SID part>-513) -> users doesn't have any effect. There are users that have the primary group RID 545, 2001 and 1201. That's somehow messy. Is there any chance to get the Domain Users into the well-known primary group rid 513?

Is there any SIMPLE way to maintain consistent mappings between windows RIDs and UNIX/LINUX UIDs/GIDs among multiple samba servers servers running winbindd? Will that problem be addressed in future samba releases? I've read about the "idmap backend" possible solution but is that the only current one? Help!!!

Hi Guys, Just a quick one...I use ldap backend for samba users and unix(PAM+NSS) users. If I was creating a new user/group/computer manually do the RID and UID/GID have to match up somehow or something?? I mean I've been reading somewhere that that RID should be somethings like UID+2x1000 or something?? Algorithmicbase?? Whats this all about? Am I making any sense? Cheers, Rhys

Hello all, i just discovered that the known hosts file seems to only store the server finger prints for distinct *hostnames/IPs*, not hostnames/IPs and ports, meaning i can't ssh to a multiple boxes on the same host even if they have different ports. Every client other than the one shipped with openSSH seems to work fine, presumably because they store fingerprints by host:port combinations

Greetings - I've been trying to get Darwine RC3 to install MS Office, but get this error (below) repeatedly. Is this a known problem? Ideas? thanks Reid bash-3.2$ /Applications/Darwine/Wine.bundle/Contents/bin/wine e: \setup.exe /autorun fixme:imm:ImmDisableIME (-1): stub fixme:advapi:CheckTokenMembership (0x0 0x122b40 0x326d8c) stub! Unknown option "L"r+"" for UI

I'm confused with group mappings. I have a win2k pt_BR server in native mode. After joining the domain (samba-3.0.7) and configuring winbind, I have these standard groups: # getent group (...) MYDOMAIN\Computadores do dom?nio:x:16777216: MYDOMAIN\Controladores de dom?nio:x:16777217: MYDOMAIN\Administradores de esquemas:x:16777218:MYDOMAIN\Administrador MYDOMAIN\Administra??o de

I found this a few months ago, but for the life of me I can't remember what the function or package was, and I have had no luck finding it this week. I have found, again, the functions for working with distributions like Cauchy, F, normal, &c., and ks.test, but I have not found the functions for estimating the distribution parameters given a vector of values. What I need to do is

Hi I have samba 3.0.14a (debian/stable) and wonder where the problem is that running this command: # net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=ntadmins rid=512 type=d gives: adding entry for group Domain Admins failed! but (note changed rid) # net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=ntadmins rid=1000 type=d works fine. Hm, winbind is not working, but I

Full_Name: Henrik Bengtsson Version: 1.3.1 OS: Sun Solaris 8 Submission from: (NULL) (130.235.3.49) I have been trying to install [R] v1.3.1 locally on a Sun Solaris 8 machine and I ran into the (already known) perl problems that express theselves as: Bare word found where operator expected at /usr/matcent/hb/R/R-1.3.1/share/perl/R/Rdconv.pm line 1390, near "$txtout mywrap"

Mar 29 10:57:02 k8ux dovecot: POP3(stf): mbox sync: Expunged message reappeared in mailbox /var/mail/stf (UID 123 < 60016, seq=2, idx_msgs=0) Mar 29 10:57:02 k8ux dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=<stf>, method=... Mar 29 10:57:03 k8ux dovecot: POP3(stf): mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox /var/mail/stf (60016 > 123, seq=2, idx_msgs=1) Mar 29 10:57:03 k8ux dovecot:

I created the well known group Domain Admins pointing to a local group, but I am not able to add users to the group -- it claims I can only add users to local or global groups... But I only see local, domain ,well-known, builtin. There are no global groups unless one would include all groups that are not local (i.e. domain, well-known, and builtin).... So why doesn't it want to let me add

Hi, I updated my two samba DC's from 4.0.3 to serner 4.0.7. Both servers run debian wheezy and the add was created at the beginning of the year with an classic upgrade to version 4.0.0. Recent release notes do not provide information about required upgrade tasks. So i ran. samba-tool dbcheck --reset-well-known-acls. On the first DC it found a few errors about missong members in computer

Hi, we are in the process of testing a migration from our NT Classic Domain with OpenLdap to Samba AD. In our test setup migration of all accounts, groups and computer accounts went well using the classicupgrade path. Next step now is testing how to add a member server for file server services. We were able to get the server to join the domain and also idmapping works mostly as expected.

I have a bunch of Windows users using a Win2k server as a PDC. I want to move all the server functions to a Samba server without disturbing the users in any way. The client machines are all Win2k, using local profiles. Samba insists on algorithmicly generating the RID from the UID, so the Windows user, after migration, gets a new SID and loses contact with their local profile. In fact, they

Forgot to CC the list. -------- Original Message -------- SUBJECT: Re: [Samba] Can't add users to well known groups... DATE: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:51:31 +0200 FROM: Fran?ois Legal TO: Linda Walsh Not sure if this is relevant, but if (first case shown down here) "Domain Admins" is not so much a group but a map to unix group, I'm not surprised that you

I'm trying to grasp pg. 154 of the "Official SAMBA-3" book by Terpstra and Vernooij and I'm just missing a critical networking concept. I understand that SIDs are the numerical identification of a user for the Windows world. I understand that UIDs are the equivalent for the *nix world. But what the @$@! is a Relative IDentifier (RID)?!? On page 153 the command to map a

On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:53:15 +0100 Yvan Masson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > For a new samba domain, I need to create users and groups with Unix > UIDs and GIDs. > > In the future, it is possible that there will be a trust with other > domains, so I need to take care that there won't be any UID/GID > conflict. Also, I assume that in the