similar to: Very strange permissions issue with Samba 3.0.20(a/b)

I use pam_require.so to limit access to services via pam. Here is how I limit access to my pure-ftpd server to a specific group (GLFTPAccess). You can also limit access to specific users, like I did with the user root. auth sufficient pam_winbind.so auth required pam_unix2.so # set_secrpc auth required pam_nologin.so auth required pam_env.so account required pam_nologin.so account

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've been trying to get LDAP ssh authentication to work for a while, and I found a bug (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/116150) in pam_unix.so, that breaks support for ldap-group/host-restrictions the ldap-way. I saw numerous emails about pam_groupdn-ldap-restrictions on the mailinglists dating back to 2001, but no resolution

Hi All I need some real help in using virt-install. I have a fedora8 o/s + Xen installed and wanted to have RHEL4 as the Guest Domain. I have mounted the CD1 of RHEL4 and wanted to install this as guest domain using virt-install and not able to do and seeking help. Please let me know if the parameters to virt-install are correct and if not please let me know the correct parameters. Contents of

Any help is greatly appreciated.   Thanks Chandra Sekhar --- On Sun, 11/16/08, Chandra Sekhar <sekhar_15@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Chandra Sekhar <sekhar_15@yahoo.com> Subject: [Xen-users] Error while running virt-install To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Date: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 11:23 PM Hi All I need some real help in using virt-install. I have a fedora8 o/s + Xen

Hello there! I have a little trouble with using dovecot as lmtp and maillists. I use dovecot 2.0.13 with exim 4.72 on Debian 6.0. (All stuff at one host). info of maillists is store in mysql table, for example: +---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | name | recipients

ZFS experts! cu is looking for _documentation_ about putting zone paths on zfs. cu is running 5.10 KP 137111-06. he needs to make sure u5 kp is ok with zone roots. Also has FSs mounted via legacy. So...anybody have documentation on which u5 or u6 of Solaris (NOT OpenSolaris) supports zfs, if any update, for zone paths? -Brian -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Sun#

Hello... Since there has been much discussion about zpool import failures resulting in loss of an entire pool, I thought I would illustrate a scenario I just went through to recover a faulted pool that wouldn''t import under Solaris 10 U5. While this is a simple scenario, and the data was not terribly important, I think the exercise should at least give some piece of mind to those who

Dear all, I need to do a loop in R, but I am not sure the software is generating "n" times the variables I request differently. When I ask to print the last matrix created, I just can see the loop for n=1. To be more precise, supose I need to simulate 10 times one variable and I want to fit the 10 variables simulated in a matrix. I dont really know what I am doing wrong, but I just

OS: Solaris 10 5/08 s10s_u5wos_10 Sol 10 U5 panic on removing device from aggr during scp copy files For some reason, I can not get the dump file out of the server. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote: | win2k clients, samba 3.0.20 pdc. | a new user, who has never logged on, does so for the | first time. the domain uses roaming profiles, and the | netlogon share provides a custom Default User dir | as well as an NTConfig.POL. | | problem: | | the default profile and policy are not downloaded | successfully from the

Hi, I am trying to test some patches that have been made post 3.0.20. I have Samba 3.0.20 src installed. I have applied two patches from SVN (9484, 9481). I have run autoconf. Poking around after "configure", I discovered I needed to run "autoheader" as well. This is fine, but I am wondering if I have missed any other steps? My steps... tar -xvzf samba-3.0.20.tar.gz

Please excuse my ignorance, since I have not used any RedHat (enterprise or otherwise) until Fedora FC3 (a few weeks) and now CentOS4 (permanently). I keep finding references to Un (I believe it's up to U5 now) in references to bugfixes, etc for RHEL. I presume (?) these are dot releases after the initial release? Is there anything equivalent for CentOS, or is this RedHat only behavior? TIA,

Hi List, Just a quick question for you: Does Samba 3.0.20 support the full_audit module? I've got the module operating on two boxes, one with Samba 3.0.25 and the other with 3.0.20, and only the former seems to interpret VFS directives, such as: full_audit:prefix = %u full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = open write close On the 3.0.20 box, they seem to be ignored,

Hello there! I have made a patch against OpenSSH 3.0.2p1 which allows the fingerprint of the accepted key to be printed in the log message. It works with SSH1-RSA and SSH2 pubkey (DSA+RSA) authentication. This feature is controllable by the LogKeyFingerprint config option (turned off by default). Michal Kara -------------- next part -------------- diff -u5

3.0.20 documentation bug: The smbclient's printmode command (which didn't actually do anything) has been removed in samba 3.0.20 but is still documented in the smbclient man page. -- Roger Cornelius rac@tenzing.org

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CEBA-2005:xxx https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel3as-errata.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: lot of files. Should be rest of the U5-batch. updates/ia64/RPMS/MyODBC-2.50.39-12.1.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/am-utils-6.0.9-2.4.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/anaconda-9.1.5.8-1.RHEL.1.centos.ia64.rpm

You accidentally asked the development list this... However, the program is quite compatible, and upgrades easily. If you want to be careful, install the new samba somewhere other than on your production machine, then run the new version of testparm on the smb.conf file from your older system. Ask this list about any errors and warnings (and CC me (:-)). Then try using the new samba to

Looks like something has changed as samba-vscan 0.3.6 (latest as of this writing) doesn't compile with 3.0.20.

Hello, I may be missing something, but it seems that there has been a change between 3.0.14a and 3.0.20 which means that a user's primary UNIX group HAS to be mapped to a valid NT group (i.e. the primary UNIX group in the LDAP DB has to have the sambagroupmapping attribute and a SID). Can anyone confirm this as a new requirement or am I being a bit stupid? I'm using an LDAP backend with

Setup: RedHat 7.2 running Samba 3.0.20-1 Mixed clients with XP-SP2 and 2000-SP4 I just upgraded from 3.0.14a-1 to 3.0.20-1 and noticed the following errors when logging in from an XP machine: Aug 22 06:46:23 yoda2 smbd[1676]: [2005/08/22 06:46:23, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_mem_get(532) Aug 22 06:46:23 yoda2 smbd[1676]: prs_mem_get: reading data of size 4 would overrun buffer. Aug 22