similar to: is this a DNS resolution problem ?

Hello... Im trying to setup HTB to allow me to shape traffic from two upstreams that meets on single lan0 interface. I prefer to use HTB qdisc within HTB root qdisc for cleaner rules design. Seems that it doesnt work at all. tc -s class show doesnt show any traffic on other classes attached to HTB qdisc. Linux 2.6.20.7 iproute-2.6.20-070313 Weird thing is that tc -s class show that 1: and 2:

I''m converting my network from a "one interface per segment" to a "single connection with vlans", well, some hardware I have requires using different vlan IDs. suffice it to say I need bridges to connect a few different vlans that should all be one but can''t be because of firmware constraints. so my first step is to get shorewall to know about bridges.

Hi! Are the GIPS codecs now implemented with the Asterisk? If I need more analog lines, say around 30, what's the easiest way doing it? I checked the Mediatrix box with 24 connections, maybe that would be a good (and rel. cheap) way to go? Any other suggestions? The ports has to support fax machines. rgds, /staffan --------------------------------------

Dear package mgcv users, I am using package mgcv to describe presence of a migratory bird species as a function of several variables, including year, day number (i.e. day-of-the-year), duration of survey, latitude and longitude. Thus, the "global model" is: global_model<-gam(present ~ as.factor(year) + s(dayno, k=5) + s(duration, k=5) + s(x, k=5) + s(y, k=5), family =

Hello to everyone, Here is the situation: [LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\ | LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet] [LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/ Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24. So I need: LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other. LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24). All LANs have to get only internet. How can I configure LinuxBR to do so?

Hi! Does * do DNS-lookups when outgoing calls are placed to a different SIP domain? Can I call from <sip:1000@mydomain.com> to <sip:2000@remote_domain.com>? Can * work as a regular SIP proxy in that aspect? Can * handle SIP URI:s that are complete SIP URI:s (sip:user@domain) instead of numbers only? Or should I run a SIP proxy on a different machine to handle pure SIP requests and let

Hello all, I''m somewhat new to networking, and I''m having trouble masquerading connections that are coming over a bridge. The bridge only has a single port for now, but I''m going to add more ports later. I''m basing my configuration on the two-interface quick start guide. I''m using Shorewall 3.0.4 on Ubuntu Dapper. My network looks like this: * The

Hi Is it possible (or recommended) to run both Asterisk and say SER on the same physical machine? How about port conflicts? Maybe the easiest way is to change the default SIP port on Asterisk? But how will that work if I register some SIP accounts directly from asterisk (like my SIP provider) but then wanna dial outbound pure SIP calls via my SER... Has anyone got a functional system like this

Thanks for this answer. As I understood, for example if parameter bind interfaces only = yes is and interfaces = lan0 (192.168.0.254) is and if broadcast packet goes from 95.95.95.14 such packet will be dropped (in other words) ? Am I right ? And other thing. Why is 192.168.0.255 (network broadcast) opened for ? May be exact such address (network broadcast) is inbtended for receiving broadcasts

Hmmm, I founded some at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2012-July/085752.html As I saw these patches was already implemented. But is it possible to receive broadcast not to 0.0.0.0 but to x.y.z.255 ? This is network broadcast either. And opened 0.0.0.0 even with checking of source net is quite insecure from net security point of view. I think so. May be is it necessary to add

I have founded that 0.0.0.0:port could be "closed" by setting up socket address = wishing IP addresses, for example socket address = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.254 2015-01-11 17:46 GMT+03:00 CpServiceSPb . <cpservicespb at gmail.com>: > Thanks for this answer. > As I understood, for example if parameter > bind interfaces only = yes is and > interfaces = lan0 (192.168.0.254)

Hi There. I am in the process of "upgrading" my Xen 2.0.7 server with a Xen 3.0.2, though I am doing so on a different machine. My firewall will be running as a DomU, asit also does on the existing server. The new server is Ubuntu 6.06 and the existing server is Debian Sarge. On the existing server, I have the WAN interface hidden from Dom0 with the two other physical interfaces

I am attempting to join a domain managed by a Samba PDC from several Windows machines, both Windows 2000 Professional and Windows XP Professional. They all give a similar error. The Windows 2000 error gives me a URL that redirects to: http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/dns/tshoot/dns_tshoot2A.asp The XP error is attached. Any idea how I can fix this problem? If necessary, I can modify the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1262 Bug ID: 1262 Summary: nft insert rule ignores space in prefix value Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 23:39, Orion Poplawski <orion at nwra.com> wrote: > On 9/23/20 7:07 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 04:33, Carlos Lopez <clopmz at outlook.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> > >> With SystemD, how can I make certain service dependent on certain > network > >> interfaces

On 9/23/20 7:07 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 04:33, Carlos Lopez <clopmz at outlook.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> >> With SystemD, how can I make certain service dependent on certain network >> interfaces being up? >> >> For example, I have an 802.1ad bond interface I need to wait on for being >> up (this

Hi Is there any work being done on implementing IM/SIMPLE support for SIP on Asterisk? Like a presence server? rdgs, /Staffan Kerker

I have an interesting problem now. I use asterisk to connect to both FWD and a sip provider here in sweden. suddenly, (i know my provider upgraded from a unknown SIP proxy to SER) Asterisk crashes when I try to make a call using this provider. FWD still works fine, and I can call directly towards the GW to POTS without any problems. But, as I call using my providers SER, Asterisk crashes.

Hi list, it's me again. I have 2 samba servers, one as a PDC, the other as a file server. I can now join the domain. But it's impossible to mount the smb shares. The 2 servers are listening on several private networks, using vlans. 10.16.41.0/24 is a routed network, all over the campus. The others are just nated through a FreeBSD box. All dns datas are ok and uptodate If I connect

Just I missed the correct IPv6 PTR record from the DNS.                                     Ok and whats obligated for a correct working kerberos environment. Ahh.. Yes... dns A and PTR records. ;-) so one thing fixed thats ok..     The PC, ( ipconfig /all ) looks good now.     Next.. your hosts files... > my /etc/hosts: > > # IPv4 and IPv6 localhost aliases >