similar to: Two DC's on same subnet possible with ldap?

I have two samba dc's, same subnet, the goal is to have them both be able to answer domain login requests and therefore if one goes down we still have the ability to login to the domain. Can this be done with samba? if so could you just tell me generally the procedure for this? heres what I have right now. server1, openldap master, samba points to loopback for ldap server2, openldap replica,

I have two samba dc's, same subnet, the goal is to have them both be able to answer domain login requests and therefore if one goes down we still have the ability to login to the domain. Can this be done with samba? if so could you just tell me generally the procedure for this? heres what I have right now. server1, openldap master, samba points to loopback for ldap server2, openldap replica,

Ok I narrowed down the problem I am having here... I have a master ldap server and a replica ldap server. If I point the DC at the master logins don't work, I get a "domain cannot be found" type message. If however I point it at the replica it works just fine. On both servers multiple other services also use ldap, they all work fine with either server, I have phpldapadmin on both

I have setup two samba domain controllers, both have basicly the same configs and use the same ldap database backend. Often however when logging in users will get a "domain cannot be contacted" error, attempting to login multiple times will eventually get them in and it will work fine from then on. The question is, is there anything else I really need to do to make this work correctly?

I have a client who has a bunch of macs accessing some samba shares, and they write these ._filename and .DS_STORE files all over the place, he would perfer it to not write these files at all. Anyone ran into this issue? what would be the best way to prevent these files from getting written onto the shares? veto? -- Matt Pruett <entelin@logicaldreams.net>

i have two domain controllers, both have openldap, server1 can write to the ldap database and pushes that to server2 which can only read. In the smbldap.conf file it reads... # Notes: to use to dual ldap servers backend for Samba, you must patch # Samba with the dual-head patch from IDEALX. If not using this patch # just use the same server for slaveLDAP and masterLDAP. # Those two servers

On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 09:21:11AM +0800, Bright Zhao wrote: > Two tinc networks/daemons, and received same subnet from the two daemons, how tinc will choose which one is preferred? And the weight settings in each daemon for subnet will or will not be the judge? If you use weights for Subnets, then the Subnet with the lowest weight will be chosen, unless the node that owns that Subnet is

Hi, Guus I referre to the two separate tinc process/network(received same subnet), not Sunbet selection within one tinc process/network. My understanding is if different tinc process comes with exact subnet, as they are not related with each other(they have no idea regarding weights with each other), I guess the routing depends on the host's main routing table, for specific route it depends

What are the reasons that two NICs on the same computer are set to the same subnet? i.e. eth0 IP addresses is x.y.z.m and eth1 is x.y.z.n. Any websites describing these in details? http://lartc.org/lartc.html#LARTC.RPDB.MULTIPLE-LINKS "4.2. Routing for multiple uplinks/providers" have two cases (Split access and Load balancing) for two or more internet connections on the same computer

By now we had running samba as PDC and fileserver for about 20 NT4-clients with roaming profiles. Now we start migrating NT4-clients to XP-clients and as I found out roaming userprofiles between XP and NT4 is not possible (NT4->XP works, but not vice versa). So I just thought about cloning all the profiles (docs and mails are not in the profiles so only bookmarks, adressbook and

Two tinc networks/daemons, and received same subnet from the two daemons, how tinc will choose which one is preferred? And the weight settings in each daemon for subnet will or will not be the judge?

Hi all, I am new to Hearbeat so please be kind :) I also posted this on Linux-HA lists with no responses so I posted it here. I have successfully configure two machines to use heartbeat to cluster httpd. The two nodes are called etk-1 and etk-2. I am trying to configure another two machines to act as a separate cluster (on the same IP subnet). These two nodes are called radu-1 and radu-2.

Hi all, Am having problems adding a new DC to a Site that doesn't already have a DC in the same subnet. Whenever I try and do a domain join specifying a nearby DC in a different subnet I get this: ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741643, 'NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT') File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run

-----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mohammed Firdosh Nasim Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 11:08 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] How to register two SIP phones ( e.g. WindowsMessenger) from different subnet to * On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 07:42, Luki wrote: >

Ah, you gave the solution yourselve.. > client on "different" subnet: > > Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : pitter35 > Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : <<< your missing .. > DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : ier.ux.uis.no > client on same subnet as DC: > > Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : geoah > Primary Dns Suffix . .

Hello list, We have KVM setup using libvirt (0.9.0) as configuration device on a Debian Squeeze Host. Networking is done in routed bridge mode and we have two different subnets, as well as one main ip. Subnets get routed to the main ip (this is done by our provider). Network on hosts are done like this: <network> <name>subnet_1</name>

Hi All, I have two SIP softphones(Windows Messenger) running on different subnet (Phone-1 on IP XXX.XXX.25.ABC & Phone-2 on IP XXX.XXX.15.XYZ) and my Asterisk Server is running on IP XXX.XXX.25.PQR.Because of some security issues both the subnets are completely isolated ( U cant even PING from one to other) and I want to connect Phone-1 & Phone-2 to the *. How can I proceed? Please

Hello! I have a problem. May be here exist anyone who has encountered with the following problem. I have a router which is connected to 2 ISP from external side and one LAN internal interface. The feature is that the one ISP allocates a subnet xxx.xxx.xxx.160/28 for me but I split it into two subnets xxx.xxx.xxx.160/29 and xxx.xxx.xxx.168/29 and assign the latter to the internal interface. Also

In the below example normal Internet traffic is routed as shown from node1 to internet1. The node1 defaultrouter points to the firewall and the firewall points to internet1. For node2 is it possible to add it's own link to the Internet passing through the same default router and firewall as node1. The links do not need to failover or provide any redundancy. node1---node1

Hello all, I have a samba domain logon server set up for Windows 98 clients using SambaV1.9.18p8. Logon and sharing are working perfectly fine. It is serving workgroup yyctpa. Today, I installed SambaV1.9.18p8 again on another Solaris 2.6 running on a PC (name TMA), using the same smb.conf as the workable version but serving a different workgroup yyctpb. I created an account testuser in the