similar to: badly mangled names from certain old apps

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "badly mangled names from certain old apps"

2004 Apr 10
1
Machine account found and not found in 3.0.2
Brad, I found your posting of 2/20/2004 with the subject line of "upgraded to 3.0.2 -> funkyness in machine accounts" while investigating a similar problem. I upgraded to 3.0.2 last week from 3.0.0. I have a system which I just added to the domain successfully. However, when I attempt to log a domain user onto that machine, I get this error: The system cannot log you on to
2004 Jun 24
1
Re: [fwd: [Fwd: Re: network response] ]
> From: Chris Garrigues <cwg-bcc@deepeddy.com> > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500 > > [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) > ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (N > o such object) These lines appear to all be searching for base="ou=group,dc=borderent,dc=com,dc=borderent,dc=com"
2006 Apr 04
1
Migrating an existing NT domain to samba
What is the best path to follow to migrate an existing NT domain to a Samba server. I've got several other Samba domains elsewhere, but none of them started as NT domains so I didn't have to do a migration. The existing network has several servers, all of which I intend to retire from fileservice once this migration is finished. At the moment I have my samba server on the network in
2005 Jun 06
1
Samba domain an many sites
Im going to install a samba domain at 4 of my sites but I trying to take of the best way to do this. going to have siteA, siteBm, siteC, and siteD. There will be an ipsec between all sites. In the past if i had to do a setup like that would to a box at each site and from there I would make rsync the samba passwd file to all the sites to keep logins in sync. Is there a better ways to to this?
2004 Mar 26
1
nmbd dying
nmbd has been dying on me occasionally. I'm running mandrake 9.2 with samba3-server-3.0.0-2mdk. We've got our users in ldap but I'd seen this symptom previously when I was using an earlier version of samba that didn't support ldap. There is nothing useful in the logs and a PS shows a nmb process still running. This last time around, I had a ptrace running on both nmbd
2004 May 26
7
File already in use?
Hi, I'm running 3.0.4 and have had several reports from users both using Office and Lotus where the application tells them that the file is already in use when we know it isn't. (BTW, there's a typo on the man page under "lock spin count". "acquired", not "aquired".) Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic
2004 Mar 26
1
Can't re-add NT box to domain
While I wait for an answer to my last question, allow me to ask another. When we upgraded a samba server from 2.x to 3.0.0-2mdk using LDAP, we managed to change the domain SID. Instead of fixing the SIDs on the sever, I re-added the hosts to the domain. Although it was a lot of work, it was successful on most of the systems on the network. However, we have one old NT4 box on the network
2004 Jun 04
0
slow setup time
I'm seeing some very slow setup times. Here's what I did. I started ethereal while things were running fine and then I waited until my windows box didn't show up in findsmb (I have keepalive set to "yes", so I don't see why it times out at all). I then went into "My computer" which was very slow. When I look in ethereal, I see some interesting nubmers in
2004 May 25
0
Windows client doesn't show up in findsmb
What does it mean if a windows XP consistently doesn't show up in findsmb even when it does show up in smbstatus? Also, I don't know if this is related or not, but the same machine sometimes shows up in smbstatus with two different PIDs. We've seen this with two different machines, both running XP. Here's smbstatus output (the machine in question is accountingiii): Samba
2004 Sep 09
0
multiple users from the same machine?
I'm concerned about the machine known as accountingii in the below smbstatus: Samba version 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1326 PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2727 bbeerman users bbeerman1 (10.2.240.172) 30957 llawrence users df2x1121 (10.2.240.190) 28942
2004 Apr 29
4
Samba 3.0.3 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several issues fixes since the 3.0.2a release and new features have been added as well. See the "Changes" section for details on exact updates. Common bugs fixed in Samba 3.0.3 include:
2004 Apr 29
4
Samba 3.0.3 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several issues fixes since the 3.0.2a release and new features have been added as well. See the "Changes" section for details on exact updates. Common bugs fixed in Samba 3.0.3 include:
2004 May 18
1
Sluggish server response
A user who had not been using the server for about half an hour had to wait for over a minute before the samba server would respond. This is using samba3-server-3.0.2a-2mdk. I hope to upgrade to 3.0.4 as soon as Buchan has the RPM ready. In the below log, the user tried to log in at about 10:27 or so. I think I'm not learning anything from this log, so I've also attached part of
2002 Jan 29
5
Still no luck on command line parse
Thanks, bjornr, however your suggestion to try: wine "C:\Program Files\intuit\qbtimer\qbtimer.exe" gave the same result as the other command lines I tried. All invoke the qbtimer program and all get the same error from qbtimer: Can't find timer file "Files/intuit/qbtimer.exe" ... So wine properly finds the qbtimer.exe file. The error arises after the program is
2002 Jan 25
1
Command line when program is not in the path
Thanks for a smoothly installing and very functional release of wine (preview 5, codeweavers-wine-20011108-5.i386.rpm), which I am using with a default config from Redhat 7.1. I am trying to construct a command line to invoke a program that is not in the [wine]Path but which is in the (windows partition) drive defined as C: in the wine config file. I have tried putting my directory in the path
2002 Feb 05
1
Still no luck on command line parse [Bug 417]
As suggested, I checked that I was getting wine of the right vintage, and as you see below, I indeed seem to have the version designated by the codeweavers rpm name I downloaded (codeweavers-wine-20011108-5.i386.rpm): [cafl@emma cafl]$ which wine /usr/bin/wine [cafl@emma cafl]$ /usr/bin/wine --version Wine release 20011108 Wine exited with a successful status [cafl@emma
2018 Sep 17
2
error about adding an trinsics
Hi,every one. This problem has been bothering me for several days.I really hope that you can help me. I want to add an trinsics in X86. This trinsics can compare two numbers and return the larger. There are the changes I do as fllowing. In /tools/clang/include/clang/Basic/BuiltinsX86.def : BUILTIN(__builtin_x86_max_qb, "iii", "") In include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicsX86.td : let
2018 Sep 06
2
Adding an trinsics in x86
Hi Everyone! I am a newbie at llvm. So the question may be fundamental but difficult to me. I want to add an trinsics in x86 and make the following changes.I want that max_qb can find the max of two Integers and return it. In src/include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.td : let TargetPrefix = "x86" in { def int_x86_max_qb: GCCBuiltin<"__builtin_x86_max_qb">,
2001 Apr 09
13
2.2 release imminent.
Well, as Andrew shouted at me again this weekend it's getting to be about that time.... :-) :-). Yep, we're thinking we should do an official 2.2 Samba release early next week, so if you have anything you can't live with, now would be a good time to tell us.... :-). It's been gestating longer than an elephant, so it's really time to let it out into the world and do its own
2009 Mar 16
1
Could Asterisk be rewriting an incoming invite?
I'm not getting inbound audio from bandwidth.com. Their engineer said the invite that they're sending me looks like this: INVITE sip:+15129616808 at 67.198.16.18:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:216.82.224.202;lr;ftag=VPSF506071629460>. Record-Route: <sip:4.79.212.229;lr;ftag=VPSF506071629460>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.82.224.202;branch=z9hG4bK6314.4f7b5d05.0. Via: