similar to: smbcacls add fails 3.0.20a

Hi all! I have a problem setting ACLs on a remote file on a Windows XP Pro SP2 box. I issue the following command: smbcacls -a 'ACL:BBI-DEV\beakid:ALLOWED/0/0x00100116' -U 'BBI-DEV \Admin' //BBI-DEV/Data /Niva.txt And I get this response from debug level 3. Password: Connecting to host=BBI-DEV Connecting to 192.168.1.124 at port 445 Doing spnego session setup (blob

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 For those interested in some more detail of the EventLog features in the upcoming Samba 3.0.21 release, see: http://www.samba.org/~jerry/Samba-EventLog-HOWTO.txt Thanks to Brian Mroan and Marcin Porwit at Centeris for all their hard work. cheers, jerry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Peter A Jonsson <pj at sics.se> wrote: > Hi Kyle, > > my apologies for mailing you directly but it seems new user creation is > disabled on the llvm bugzilla. > > We sometime lose edges during IfConversion of diamonds and it’s not > obvious how to reproduce on an upstream target. The documentation for > HasFallThrough says *may*

In the section expaining "dyn_cast" There are following lines of code: if (AllocationInst *AI = dyn_cast<AllocationInst>(Val)) { ... } I cannot understand how you take a operand, a value, and cast it into a Instruction. Can you explain it for me? Another common example is: // Loop over all of the phi nodes in a basic block BasicBlock::iterator BBI =

Evan, et al., I've come across a small issue when using the if conversion pass in PPC to generate conditional returns. Here's a small example: ** Before if conversion ** BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry %R3<def> = LI 0 %CR0<def> = CMPLWI %R3, 0 BCC 68, %CR0, <BB#3> Successors according to CFG: BB#3(16) BB#1(16) BB#1: derived from LLVM BB

Thanks for the review Gordon. On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Gordon Henriksen <gordonhenriksen at mac.com>wrote: > On 2011-10-31, at 17:21, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > > > Here's a patch to allow a GCStrategy to customize the places where it > wants to insert safe points. I'm not sure who maintains the GC code today > in LLVM (I'd be happy to take ownership, if

On Nov 1, 2011, at 4:47 AM, Nicolas Geoffray <nicolas.geoffray at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the review Gordon. > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Gordon Henriksen <gordonhenriksen at mac.com> wrote: > On 2011-10-31, at 17:21, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > > > Here's a patch to allow a GCStrategy to customize the places where it wants to insert safe points.

On 4/10/2013 12:45 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Should AnalyzeBranch be enhanced to somehow indicate conditional returns? I don't think that returns can ever be analyzable (since LLVM's CFG does not have a designated exit block). > Alternatively, the diamond conversion routine contains this: > > // RemoveExtraEdges won't work if the block has an unanalyzable branch,

my compiler gave me a warning in MCObjectDisassembler.cpp. it found a self-comparation in loop condition. I think it's a typo. the suspicious code was introduced by this patch: >From f176482752fbea3139394e280adfb10270dd3aac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:28:55 +0000 Subject: MC CFG: Support disassembly at

Any chance of adding some missing test coverage here? That code was dead (& evidently untested) before... On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > I believe you are correct. Fixed thusly: > > dzur:~/sources/llvm> git svn dcommit > Committing to https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk ... > M

Hi, TL;DR: A loop doesn't get vectorized due to the interaction of loop- rotate, licm and instcombine. What to do about it? Full story: In the benchmarks for our out-of-tree target we have a case that we would like to get vectorized, but currently it isn't. I've done some digging to see why and have some kind of idea what prevents it, but I don't know what the best way to fix

Also sprach xli3 at uiuc.edu: } In the section expaining "dyn_cast" } There are following lines of code: } if (AllocationInst *AI = dyn_cast<AllocationInst>(Val)) { } ... } } } I cannot understand how you take a operand, a value, and cast } it into a Instruction. Can you explain it for me? } } Another common example is: } } // Loop over all of the phi nodes

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Bjorn De Sutter wrote: > Hi all, > > I am working on a CGRA backend (something like a 2D VLIW), and we also absolutely need predication. I extended the IfConversion pass to allow it to be executed multiple times and to predicate already predicated code. This is necessary to predicate code with nested conditional statements. At this point, we

Hi all, I am working on a CGRA backend (something like a 2D VLIW), and we also absolutely need predication. I extended the IfConversion pass to allow it to be executed multiple times and to predicate already predicated code. This is necessary to predicate code with nested conditional statements. At this point, we support or, and, and conditional predicates (see Scott Mahlke's papers on this

Hi all, I have implemented a GC plugin and i want to exclude Tail-call instructions from being considered as Safe Points. For that reason I have overwritten the "findCustomSafePoints" function with something like that: bool ErlangGC::findCustomSafePoints(GCFunctionInfo &FI, MachineFunction &MF) { for (MachineFunction::iterator BBI = MF.begin(),

Hi all, I'm looking for a LLVM method/class/strategy to know the lifetime of every variable/value used in a given Module. I want to know the variables that must be alive at the input and at the end of every function call (and every BasicBlock). By creating a pass inheriting from ModulePass I can reach up to here: virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F) { ... for

Dear R-users I intend to create a function which calls some smaller other functions in return. Some of these smaller functions all call some functions. I do not know a good way to do this. I tried using the source() function to include the smaller functions within the main functions before they are called. This does not work, or maybe i am not doing the right thing. For example: the

On 2011-10-31, at 17:21, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Here's a patch to allow a GCStrategy to customize the places where it wants to insert safe points. I'm not sure who maintains the GC code today in LLVM (I'd be happy to take ownership, if needed). > > The patch just adds up a custom safepoints flag, similar to the way the GCStrategy can customize intrinsics lowering, or

You might want to look more carefully at how you're constructing the MemoryLocation.   The first argument is a pointer, and the second argument is the number of bytes pointed to by that pointer (or MemoryLocation::UnknownSize if the number of bytes accessed isn't known). More generally, copy-pasting code you don't understand isn't a good idea. -Eli On 5/22/2018 4:02 PM, Dávid

IR: define i32 @calloc_strlen_write_between() { %call = tail call noalias i8* @calloc(i32 10, i32 1) store i8 97, i8* %call, align 1 %call1 = tail call i32 @strlen(i8* %call) ret i32 %call1 } static bool eliminateStrlen(CallInst *CI, BasicBlock::iterator &BBI, AliasAnalysis *AA, MemoryDependenceResults *MD, const DataLayout &DL, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI,