similar to: Winbind have repeat "wbinfo -u" before user can authentication

OS: Redhat Enterprise Linux V.4 update1 samba-client-3.0.10-1.4E samba-common-3.0.10-1.4E system-config-samba-1.2.21-1 samba-common-3.0.10-1.4E samba-3.0.10-1.4E ### nsswitch.conf ### passwd: file winbind group: file winbind shadow: file winbind #### /etc/pam.d/system-auth ###### auth required /lib/security/$ISA/pam_env.so auth sufficient /lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so

Have any way for winbind to map all user from active directory to single uid/gid or map uid/gid to uid that already have on local system(linux) ? Is ldap backend can do that ? I try to integrate user with maildrop because maildrop need same global uid/gid for all user ( user that i collect from winbind) Regard, nattapon _________________________________________________________________

Please, How to certify me that I am installing the CentOS equivalent to RHEL 3 update1 or update2? Thanks, Zamil Machado Cavalcanti Bahia - BRAZIL Linux Counter #56812 http://counter.li.org

Im setting up scripted samba4 installs to make things more uniform installations. It saves time, and errors, and it will be easier to trace bugs. ? This is the first one and more are comming. ? This is Update1: new link:? https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/? files are now clickable, we want easy ;-) ? How does it work and what do you need and what do you get in the end. ? What you get. Debian

Small update, i saw some errors in the webserver, i fixed the links below. All working now. ( sorry for that ) --------------- Im setting up scripted samba4 installs to make things more uniform installations. It saves time, and errors, and it will be easier to trace bugs. ? This is the first one and more are comming. ? This is Update1: new link:? https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts files are

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, find a patch which is an update to a patch sent months ago. Before it was in net/sock.c, now I moved it to format.c, so net CVS module is not affected. It polls the socket before trying to send() any byte to check if the TCP buffers are full due to network congestion. See below the warning messages of "normal" (at least in

Hi Mike, find enclosed the patch to move the logic of clients' queue data to a function. Later I'll provide you the patch to use a [configurable] queue size in bytes instead of number of refbufs (see the footnote). Regards, <p>[*] I was doing some testing with MP3, aside it has some nasty bugs [**], lame encoder sends very small packages, about 350 bytes in size,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry. The patch is hopely here. On Saturday 18 January 2003 03:38, Michael Smith shaped the electrons to shout: > > Hi, > > find a patch which is an update to a patch sent months ago. Before > > it was in net/sock.c, now I moved it to format.c, so net CVS module > > is not affected. It polls the socket before trying to

I'm still trying to get an idea about how best to handle patches on CentOS. Say I want to apply security patches automatically on a nightly basis. But when the push from 4.2 to 4.3 comes around, I want to defer that for when I can do it manually. Is that possible? (Preferably with yum, but I would use up2date if that were necessary.) Also, I'm used to doing 'yum update'. I

Hi, After last kernel update (yesterday), I can't use my pendrive. After insert to port there is no new drive icon on a desktop. Anybody has the same problem? Regards. -- ____________________________________________________________________ D o m i n i k S k ? a d a n o w s k i

An interesting point came up while recently discussing my Postfix virtual_alias issues with the MailScanner list. Apparently there is some risk with the "two instances of postfix" approach described in: http://www.hughesjr.com/content/view/12/30/Guides It sounds like Postfix and MailScanner can step on each other in the deferred queue. They recommended the single Postfix instance

I have a situation where I have several different methods that put up forms for the user that all update various parts of the same model. They could all go through the same "update" method, with a structure at the end like: if at-variable.update_attributes(parms) flash - it worked else render action => "The form that got us here" end however, its

Dear list, I cannot upgrade my 6.3-RELEASE-p7/i386 to 6.4-RELEASE with freebsd-update. I have run: # freebsd-update upgrade -r 6.4-RELEASE and then # freebsd-update install No updates are available to install. Run '/usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch' first. any ideas? (btw: I've successful updated 6.3REL/amd64 to 6.4-REL) Best regards, Thomas.

I downloaded 3.8.0rc3 and I also have it in 3.8.0rc3. I did set a data access breakpoint on the first function ptr that causes the invalid heap. This would allow me to break whenever someone is touching that address. It did not show double deletes during debugging. Further more I managed to narrow it down to 2 function calls: // stupid code, but its just for triggering heap error auto func =

Hi all, I see centos 3.5Beta in the beta.centos.org. Is this the next release of version 3 ? Strangely, 3.4 is not the final release of version 3 ? Thx Ceg Ryan

I'm not going to bore you with all the stuff I've done since November here. I put it, and some examples, in the file update1.txt in the git archive. To read it, do a git clone of https://github.com/WyoMurf/SaySentence.git I a nutshell, I've upgraded the SayScript grammar to handle expressions in the file names, upgraded the current en, fr, it, hu, and some others, to use the same

I made the llvm::Function() constructor public (for testing purpose) and used the non-overloaded new. auto func = ::new llvm::Function(...) if (func) func->eraseFromParent(); And the heap corruption is gone! Did something changed in llvm::User::new between 3.7.1 and 3.8.0 ? I found a bug in llvm ? On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:10 PM, koffie drinker <gekkekoe at gmail.com> wrote: > I

Dear list, as described in http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.3R/announce.html I tried a binary upgrade to 6.3R. But the command # sh freebsd-update.sh -f freebsd-update.conf -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade failed with 10....2520....2530....2540....2550....2560....2570....2580....2590....2600....2610....2620....2630....2640... done. Applying patches... done. Fetching 1587 files... failed. Any ideas

I recently upgraded from llvm 3.7.1 to a pre release of llvm (3.8.0rc2) in order to test some issues regarding bug 24233. After upgrading I starting to see heap corruption messages in vs 2015 sp1 when my program exits. "HEAP[ConsoleEngine.exe]: Invalid address specified to RtlValidateHeap( 0000000000290000, 0000000000318698 )" Initially I only got it in Release build. Debug build seems

I found the root cause, but I don't know what's the best approach to fix it. Under windows, 64 bit, when a function is created the void *User::operator new(size_t Size) operator allocates space + Use*. In the Use* the HasHungOffUses is set to true. So the ptr to the use* is returned as new object. This ptr is NOT the ptr that was allocated by the system. For that ptr you need ptr - word