similar to: locking.tdb: expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied)

Hello, Back when 2.2.2 was the current samba release I came across the following problem when deleting folders in Windows 2000 which I'll repost again below. After I finally got his attention with a few very wordy messages to the samba mailing list, Jeremy fixed it blazingly fast and wrote me back: "I just found the problem and fixed it in 2.2 CVS and HEAD CVS. It was to do with the

Hello, In regards to this thread: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-September/111158.html I might be seeing a similar compatibility with this call is on Virtuozzo based system. > cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike) > uname -a Linux hostname 2.6.8-022stab078.9-enterprise #1 SMP Thu Jun 8 12:38:51 MSD 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux > mount /dev/vzfs on /

Hello, I've been wondering why my no-optimization R-devel builds have been hanging during "building/updating package indices ...". I tracked it down with gdb to this line from do_basename in utils.c: while ( *(p = buf + strlen(buf) - 1) == fsp ) *p = '\0'; Now, imagine if your compiler places the variable fsp immediately before buf on the stack, and strlen(buf) is 0.

We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote the attached patch. > > We got the logs by forcing smbd to run with -d10 by patching > file_server/fileserver.c. The issue appears to be in this call: 3638 /* Ensure there was no race condition. */ 3639 if (!check_same_stat(&smb_dname->st, &fsp->fsp_name->st)) { 3640

So last week I was wondering if XFS was still working -- even with its last on-disk structure changes -- and it _suprisingly_ worked as expected. Right, now I can finally get rid of GRUB and use Syslinux to boot my Linux on EFI from a rootfs with xfs. Shit, I have two partitions (the first one being the required ESP) so there is no way to access the other partitions since because Syslinux does not

T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk wrote: > > > But we'd like to go one step further and have the return code from preexec > be used to continue or abort the connection being established. The script > above would be modified to generate this return code. > > Looking through the source code (smbd/service.c), it doesn't seem to check > the return code (calling smbrun to do the

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:03:49PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:46:19PM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > > > > > Cheerio! > > > -slow > > > > Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: > > > > When adding the

Hi, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction. My samba version is samba-4.2.10-6.2.el7_2.x86_64. I have lots of daily core dumps (~20 on each machine daily) and I have no clear idea why. I'm including the stack trace below. It looks like the problem is related to "invalid lock_order". Any ideas? Thanks, Sergei #0 0x00007fc5a34945f7 in raise () from

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:14:00PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:06:42PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, as much as I'd like to avoid adding a new option, I guess we > > > have to do something about it, my latest take on this is >

I have an intermittent problem with dangling MS Access DB lock files. In a productive environment with N batch queus (each on a separate Windows XP Professional) a scheduler PC dispatches the work load to a free queue by means of modifying a simple MS Access DB file called "PRIM.mdb", which resides on a Samba 3.0.20 share. Each free queue PC polls the same MS Access DB file every 60

A couple of days ago, we noticed the following message appearing in syslog: Aug 14 15:09:35 zadok smbd[16067]: tdb(/var/lock/samba/locking.tdb): expand_file write of 8192 bytes failed (No space left on device) Similar messages would show up for several of the files under /var/lock/samba. Running df showed that /run/lock was full. Not having ever paid any attention to /run/lock before, I

Hi All, I was checking the access rights and a problem (hence a question) appeared: Who can delete a file through Samba ? Suppose we have the following situation: drwxrwxrwx john finance directory -rw-r--r-- jack finance directory/file Under unix everyone can delete the file. Under Samba, the documentation says (due to the Windows sementic) you also need the write access to the

Whenever I try to read or modify ACLs from my Windows 2000 PDC, my Samba Domain Member Server (Security = ADS) does not allow setting ACLs, nor does it display the existing ACLs. - I have setup ACLs in my Kernel - I have translated and installed libacl and libattr - I can see and modify ACLs with getfacl and setfacl. - I have translated Samba 3.0.23d with --with-acl-support=yes - I have enabled

> > If you feel like it, you could write a VFS module that adds better support > for > this on FreeBSD, but what is the use case? > I've noticed in online forums that occasionally home NAS users will for various reasons have streams_xattr enabled and receive 'access denied' errors when trying to write files with large alternate datastreams. These are typically on media

Hi all,. I'm getting this:- [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1274) fcntl_lock 6 34 0 1 2 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1314) fcntl_lock: Lock call successful [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:(475) tdb((NULL)): tdb_brlock failed (fd=7) at offset 4 rw_type=2 lck_type=6 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] smbd/connection.c:(156) claiming 0 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 0]

What's up fellows... I am a begginer in R and i am trying to find the parameters of one likelihood function, but when i otimize it, always appers a error or advertisement and the solve does not occur. The problem seems like that: "lMix<-function(pars,y){ beta1<-pars[1] beta2<-pars[2] beta3<-pars[3] beta4<-pars[4] beta5<-pars[5] alfa1<-pars[6]

Hi all, I've bought UPS FSP EP 850 because I have similar UPS, FSP EP 1000. It is working on my other server with with Fedora 14, kernel 2.6.35.14-106.fc14.x86_64 and installed nut-2.6.2-1. My new UPS is detected by kernel (see below lsusb output) and is partially detected by blazer_usb driver also. But it doesn't communicate with driver (see below blazer_usb output). I run all

Hi there, We are thinking about sharing same files: - OS2/Win clients with Samba - Linux clients with NFS. So, the same files would be shared by 2 different protocols. Looking at the open.c samba code, there seems to be no check / no error (sharing violation) returned to the smb client when the file is already locked by an NFS client. - So, even if a file is opened and locked by an NFS client,

Hi! Using this guide: http://blog.shadypixel.com/monitoring-a-ups-with-nut-on-debian-or-ubuntu-linux/ and systematically testing the usb capable driver on your site I managed to get my FSP EP650 (by http://www.fspgroupusa.com/ ) working (after reboot). Im running Ubuntu 9.10 desktop x64 standard install. This is the output from running "upsc ups1" ----- battery.voltage: 13.50

I can't create new folder in a czech Win95 explorer on a unix using samba 1.9.18p7. The problem is that Windows exporer uses for the creation new folder a name containing characters above 128. The explorer creates new folder in a two phases: the first It creates directory named Nov<A0> slo<A7>zka and next it gives to user posibility to change this name. Crazy !!? The first phase