similar to: Samba Over A Wan

Server will have two fix public ips. Dave > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] load balance with 2 wan connections > From: Alejandro Imass <ait at p2ee.org> > Date: Sat, December 25, 2010 1:58 pm > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at

Hello All I have looking for any specific answer for one thing. I have a virtualized Server with only one physical interface eth0 (WAN). To run OpenVPN i need to use DHCP server. And here is the question: is there a chance to run DHCP server on eth0:0 interface? Or it is impossible ? Thanks in advance. -- /Best Regards *Greg*/ UML Professional (Cert #251574932)

hi everyone, so,first it seemed a trivial question to me, but since I could not find anybody being neither able to answer this question nor giving a short config example. after a few sleepless nights and exhausting all the reading and research. here I am sharing my problem with all of you, in the hope of some possible solution/sugestion. or is it that this is impossible?? below my

ClarkConnect Home 3.2 eth0 - WAN - inet - ip:192.168.1.2 gw:192.168.1.1 (connected to my www.woosh.co.nz gatway) wlan - WAN - private community wireless networt - ip:10.252.16.16 gw:10.252.16.1 eth1 - LAN - ip:192.168.2.1 # route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 gw 10.252.16.1 [root@bowenvale etc]# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface

What about your openvpn config? The tun net must have an entry in your hosts allow. If you work with briding the remote network has to be the same subnet as the local!? Bridging is the best way to have a remote net integrated. I have one logging in form Berlin on my Samba-Domain. Daniel ----------------------------------------------- EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik

Hi All, I have a openvpn setup between two Linux boxes. The internal networks on each side are on seperate network ranges. I can ping all boxes from either side, and if I search for a box using it's ip address, I can see the box and access it's shares. What I would like to do however is to be able to see the the pc's in their workgroups (each subnet has it's own workgroup). I

hi, we use openvpn as for our vpn endpoints and we''ve got about 70-80 vpn connections which means we have tun0 - tun80 interface. i''d like to define one zone for all of our vpn connections how can I do that? actualy our local zone is 192.168.0.0/17 (not 16) and all of the vpn''s are in 192.168.128.0/17. our should i define somehow the local zone as 192.168.0.0/16? but in

Perhaps someone with a sharper brain than I can solve this little mystery. I've Googled until I'm blue in the face, read all TFM's I can find, and tried several iptables rule combinations but just can't get the following to work. Here's my challenge: I have a CentOS-5.3 "main" server with a static public IP address running Apache, OpenVPN, and a bunch of other

Hi! I''m trying to create a routed VPN using OpenVPN - and having trouble with the routing concepts involved. Let me see if I can properly describe my current topology: Server - LAN, with both local workstations and remote bridged workstations on the 192.168.0.0/24 network (this works without reservation). Server located at 192.168.0.71, 192.168.0.72, 192.168.0.222, and few

Hello all, I have a linux machine with a SIP server (Asterisk) and 2 WAN interfaces (NATed) configured to do load balancing. I experienced problems with the SIP/RTP protocols and load balancing, because when initiating a call to an external SIP Host, a new RTP flow starts from the server to the Host, that sometimes uses another default route (due to the nexthop configuration). As i have two

Hi, I''m implementing a linux router with this characteristics: - Multiple adsl with each public ip''s - Multiple LAN ethernets (in a bridge). - Linux IGD I have successfully implemented de 2 first steps, the adsl balanced fine (multipath routing), and the clients bridge fine. My problem is how to use that with linux-igd. My LAN bridge has STP and is implemented for

I have been using shorewall and freeswan successfully for 3 or more years now. But they have all been using the Linux 2.4 kernel. My current configuration is (as the title suggests) using SuSE 9.1 which has a 2.6.5 kernel and freeswan 2.0.4 built-in. After much reading and a lot of trial and error, I did get this combination to work with Shorewall 2.0.9. It is happily talking to an older Mandrake

I''ve just discovered that I do not have access to the remote gateways for a set of IPsec tunnels to remote networks. This prevents me from changing the routing table on those gateways. I need "roadwarrior" systems connecting to me local network using OpenVPN (tun) to be able to access those systems. Since the remote gateways don''t know about 10.100.1.0/24, where my

You need to ensure that traffic to the SIP box is sent to the correct IP. Also if you use split-tunnel (eg: not redirect-gateway def1) you must make sure NAT and traffic redirection works as is so the Asus router knows it should send the traffic through tunnel and not via WAN. IMPORTANT: Then you must, in the ASUS RT-N66U make a port forward inwards from TUN to the phone client. I would suggest

Hi all, I searched the archives for a solution to this issue but didn't find any thing. I have an office with a mix of PCs running ME and XP that use Samba 2.2.7 under RH Linux 7.3 as an archive for mortgage information. When documents are moved to the Samba share, the file creation timestamp on the Linux box reflects the time the files were created on the PCs. What I need is for the

Hello, I have Samba version 3.0.24 running on a 2.6.14-gentoo-r5 x86 kernel (xeon 3ghz, 1gb ram raid 5). All clients accessing samba shares via LAN have no problems. Samba server works perfectly and fast. We are instead experiencing serious performance issues when accessing samba shares from remote clients (WAN), via VPN. Simple operations like "open a file", "copy & paste a

I''m trying to implement simple untagged vlans on our switch and have misconfigured something.. ISP gw is on the default vlan1 (untagged) Router eth1 is setup on the switch with default vlan1 and member of vlan4. eth0 is default vlan4 which connects to the clients that are all default members of vlan4 eth0 is x.x.x.86/28 This is what clients are connecting to as their gw.. (no

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen! On a CD-ROM-server at the University Koblenz-Landau we are using Samba (2.0.5a) with Red Hat Linux (6.0, Kernel 2.2.5). The server is located here in Koblenz, but also used from another department of the university at Landau (about 80 miles from Koblenz; they have their own class B network). A traceroute from both locations gave a response time of about 10-50 msec. On

This (CentOS5.1) box is my new imap server. Using system-config-security-level I opened port 143 tcp, and mail is readable throughout the LAN. I want a Roaming account on my laptop so that I can read mail while away from home. I have set up the account in kmail, and I know that that part is correct, as it worked on my old, less-secured, imap server. However, I haven't been able so far

Hi I am a user of openVPN and am keen to explore tinc to help with a specific problem. My example - I have 10 computers all connected to internet via mobile broadband and public apns. all wan ip addresses are dynamic and change often - there is no machine or point with a static ip. I am not allowed to use any third party services like dyndns. I want each computer to continue to be able to