similar to: samba permissions

############################# In German : Hallo, gibt es da Jemanden der mir den folgenden Text vielleicht ein bischen besser erkl?ren kann? Habe dies aus dem Samba Developers Guide. Warum mach ich das nun? Ich habe ein Problem: Ich will das jedes mal wenn ein User versucht einen Ordner in der Freigabe zu verschieben oder umzubenenner, der nicht leer ist, eine Fehlermeldung auf dem Client

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:03:49PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:46:19PM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > > > > > Cheerio! > > > -slow > > > > Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: > > > > When adding the

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:14:00PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:06:42PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, as much as I'd like to avoid adding a new option, I guess we > > > have to do something about it, my latest take on this is >

Hi I need to write a simple VFS module and I have to use C++ instead of C. I took sample files, compiled it and everything does work. However, when I compile it as C++, during the runtime I can see errors in the log: Can't find a vfs module. I am not experienced C or C++ programmer in linux environment, probably I do some silly mistake, but I am really stucked now. I am using Samba version

Hi All, Setup :- NAS device is running with 2.6.13 kernel and samba 3.0.32.I have connected a 4GB USB flash drive having FAT32.USB drive is available from the windows machine as connected shared drive. >From my windows machine when I am trying to copy the file (>1Gb) to shared USB drive(FAT32).it is giving error as shared USB drive is not reachable. File copy is working fine with small

On Fri, 11 May 2018 09:14:24 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > You would replace 'FACILITY' with one of the facilities shown in > > 'man syslog' e.g. full_audit:facility = LOG_AUTH > > OK, done. But samba (as stated in previous email) still reply:

I use fedora 7 and the last stable version of samba 3.0.25a-3 on an embedded linux system as a server and a windows xp. I 'am using truecrypt and sharing de mount directory with the XP machine via samba. Selniux is disabled. Everything works well such as connection or small files transfers but we have a huge problem when we try to transfer a big file (~100 MB) from the client (Windows) to the

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > ...and this one even has bug urls in all commit messages. Sorry for > forgetting this in the previous version. Juuuusttt *one* leetle change, sorry :-). I was following the changes to the talloc heirarchy in the code and realized that adding the following change made it much clearer (at least to me). diff --git

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > Cheerio! > -slow Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: When adding the validate_nt_acl_blob() function in [PATCH 06/12] vfs_acl_common: move the ACL blob validation to a helper function this makes some of the existing function names in debug statements incorrect. Eg. validate_nt_acl_blob()

Problem is apparently with locking issues, disabled oplocks in the [general] section, and the problem actually got worse... Here's what happens: User-A part of group1, opens Excel file off of share, saves, exits... User-B (or even User-A for that matter) tries to re-open same file, get error stating it's locked and can only open for read-only access... Both users in the same group, and

T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk wrote: > > > But we'd like to go one step further and have the return code from preexec > be used to continue or abort the connection being established. The script > above would be modified to generate this return code. > > Looking through the source code (smbd/service.c), it doesn't seem to check > the return code (calling smbrun to do the

Is behavior of ACLs under Samba 3.3.0 (Sernet) completely different from that under version 3.2.7? The release notes only talks about some "fixes". I installed version 3.3.0 and got completely different result with the same filesystem and the exact same samba configuration. The ACLs behaved strangely and appeared very different under Windows ACL editor. Users were now unable to

Hai, I use the following on one of my member servers. Put set these three in your global smb.conf. enable privileges = Yes unix extensions = No allow insecure wide links = Yes And on the share i have set. wide links = yes follow symlinks = yes and this is working for years for me. Try these and report back. If its not working tell us you OS and samba version Greetz, Louis

Hello, I am having the same problem as below. I am using 3.02a on FreeBSD. Was this solved or does anyone know how to solve it? Many Thanks, Chetana On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:54:18AM +0200, yves.lejeune at kodak.com wrote: > Hello, > > > > > > > Is is normal to have the initial double SMB_VFS_CONNECT and > > > SMB_VFS_DISCONNECT ? > > > Should I

I have "hide dot files" on, but I have noticed that while files with a single dot are hidden, files with multiple dots are not: ".foo" - hidden "...foo" - not hidden Is this by design? *nix certainly hide such files by default... -- Barry -- http://barrkel.blogspot.com/

Hi, I'm using samba version samba-4.1.6+dfsg included in last ubuntu LTS version. Here is my smb.conf file: [global] # configuration du serveur netbios name = scribe workgroup = dompedago server string = scribe preferred master = yes domain logons = yes security = user ldap passwd sync = yes passdb backend =

We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote the attached patch. > > We got the logs by forcing smbd to run with -d10 by patching > file_server/fileserver.c. The issue appears to be in this call: 3638 /* Ensure there was no race condition. */ 3639 if (!check_same_stat(&smb_dname->st, &fsp->fsp_name->st)) { 3640

Le 04/01/2016 09:11, L.P.H. van Belle a écrit : > From : man smb.conf > > Which explains it self. > > enable privileges (G) > [..] Hi, Thank you for your answer, would you mind if I ask for some more help ? I'm sorry I don't understand exactly why you told me to look at the `enable privileges` parameter in the man pages as an answer. I have already closely

Hi all, On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 03:00:49PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:42:48PM +0200, Ervin Heged?s wrote: > > Dear Samba users, > > > > here is an Ubuntu 14.04, with Samba 4 (4.1.6), and LDAP (slapd > > 2.4.31). The config came from a previous system (Debian Squeezy), > > which had been crashed (HW error - on this new machine,

Hi! Our Samba file server seems to have a memory leakage. We are using samba as file server out of the box (debian sarge) on kernel 2.6.16.31. After a while users who have some shares and files open are acquiring more and more memory until the smbd dies. Here is a small shortcut from top: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 13843 gxxxxx 16 0 51792 44m 2552 S