similar to: 3.0.20 crashes on startup

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 110 matches similar to: "3.0.20 crashes on startup"

2005 Sep 29
1
smb_panic after upgrading
I am running a Linux SLES 9 server geobase-linux{root}838: uname -a Linux geobase-linux 2.6.5-7.191-smp #1 SMP Tue Jun 28 14:58:56 UTC 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I tried to upgrade from Samba 3.0.14a (which I had installed via RPMs and was running fine) to samba-3.0.20-0.1 from the RPMs on the Samba site. I know get smb_panics on smbd Here is my smbd.log: geobase-linux{root}833: more
2005 Jul 29
6
Samba 3.0.20rc1 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== Oplocks are strange -- Volker Lendecke ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is a release candidate of the 3.0.20 code base and is provided for
2005 Oct 13
1
Re: BUG: default profile failure in 3.0.20 [was: Regression in 3.0.20 wrt netlogon and profiles ?]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 J?rn Nettingsmeier wrote: | win2k clients, samba 3.0.20 pdc. | a new user, who has never logged on, does so for the | first time. the domain uses roaming profiles, and the | netlogon share provides a custom Default User dir | as well as an NTConfig.POL. | | problem: | | the default profile and policy are not downloaded | successfully from the
2005 Sep 11
0
Problem with winbind on Samba PDC after 3.0.20
Hi, I'm using winbind to authenticate squid proxy users via ntlm_auth. Squid, samba and winbind run on the same server. The server is PDC and a member of the domain. After update samba from 3.0.14a up to 3.0.20 ntlm_auth does not work. Also wbinfo got error: # wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED (0xc0000022) Could not check secret
2005 Sep 01
0
[PATCH] 3.0.20, usermgr.exe, and setting group information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Patch URL: http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/usrmgr_groups_v1.patch This one fixes issues when setting group information via usrmgr.exe and 'passdb backend = ldapsam'. The symptom in the logs is the dreaded "smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root.." error. Also refer to https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3047
2005 Sep 29
0
Re: Need HELP in upgrading SAMBA 2.2.12 to 3.0.20
You accidentally asked the development list this... However, the program is quite compatible, and upgrades easily. If you want to be careful, install the new samba somewhere other than on your production machine, then run the new version of testparm on the smb.conf file from your older system. Ask this list about any errors and warnings (and CC me (:-)). Then try using the new samba to
2008 Jun 20
1
Samba 3.0.20 & Windows 2008
Hello, You ALL, has anybody gotten Samba to work with Windows 2008? do I need to enable any features in Windows 2008? I had read the official & unofficial howto and not luck getting samba to work with Windows 2008. FreeBSD 7.0 Windows Longhorn Server Enterprise 2008 Thanks, -Augustin
2005 Oct 13
1
Samba 3.0.20, Active Directory, Debian: Username ... is invalid on this system
Hello List, I have a strange problem: I have successfully added my debian system to the local active directory domain. Winbind works and gives me Users, Groups, and relations when I call wbinfo. However, Users cannot connect to a share I prepared. It makes no difference if there is no "valid user = " entry, or if I put an correct entry with my test user. All I get in log.winbindd is:
2005 Sep 28
0
Samba 3.0.20 aio compile failure on AIX 5.2
I just tried to compile Samba 3.0.20 on AIX 5.2 (someone suggested that it may resolve the other issue I'm having, I doubt it, but it's worth a try). I received the following error when I tried to do the compile: /usr/include/aio.h:76: field `aio_sigevent' has incomplete type /usr/include/aio.h:127: field `aio_sigevent' has incomplete type In file included from dynconfig.c:21:
2007 Aug 03
1
full_audit on Samba 3.0.20 vs 3.0.25
Hi List, Just a quick question for you: Does Samba 3.0.20 support the full_audit module? I've got the module operating on two boxes, one with Samba 3.0.25 and the other with 3.0.20, and only the former seems to interpret VFS directives, such as: full_audit:prefix = %u full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = open write close On the 3.0.20 box, they seem to be ignored,
2005 Oct 14
1
smbcacls add acl fails 3.0.20
Hi all! I have a problem setting ACLs on a remote file on a Windows XP Pro SP2 box. I issue the following command: smbcacls -a 'ACL:BBI-DEV\beakid:ALLOWED/0/0x00100116' -U 'BBI-DEV \Admin' //BBI-DEV/Data /Niva.txt And I get this response from debug level 3. Password: Connecting to host=BBI-DEV Connecting to 192.168.1.124 at port 445 Doing spnego session setup (blob
2005 Aug 31
0
Samba 3.0.20 on Solaris ( 3.0.14a idem) - C compiler cannot create executables
Hi, I've a real problem on my sol8 server : - gcc, binutils, etc are installed, PATH is ok, as, ld, etc too MIT kerberos and Openldap have compiled without any problem but for samba during "configure" I directly get : "C compiler cannot create executables" and no error about a gcc not found ! I only see " " not found but it doesn't tell me what in
2005 Aug 22
2
3.0.20 documentation bug
3.0.20 documentation bug: The smbclient's printmode command (which didn't actually do anything) has been removed in samba 3.0.20 but is still documented in the smbclient man page. -- Roger Cornelius rac@tenzing.org
2005 Aug 22
2
samba-vscan 0.3.6 doesn't compile with 3.0.20
Looks like something has changed as samba-vscan 0.3.6 (latest as of this writing) doesn't compile with 3.0.20.
2005 Aug 23
2
Possible change to group behaviour from 3.0.14a-> 3.0.20?
Hello, I may be missing something, but it seems that there has been a change between 3.0.14a and 3.0.20 which means that a user's primary UNIX group HAS to be mapped to a valid NT group (i.e. the primary UNIX group in the LDAP DB has to have the sambagroupmapping attribute and a SID). Can anyone confirm this as a new requirement or am I being a bit stupid? I'm using an LDAP backend with
2005 Aug 23
1
Process build properly after applying patchs to 3.0.20
Hi, I am trying to test some patches that have been made post 3.0.20. I have Samba 3.0.20 src installed. I have applied two patches from SVN (9484, 9481). I have run autoconf. Poking around after "configure", I discovered I needed to run "autoheader" as well. This is fine, but I am wondering if I have missed any other steps? My steps... tar -xvzf samba-3.0.20.tar.gz
2005 Aug 26
1
3.0.20 compiles in aio support on aix by default, and when asked not to
I'm trying to install samba-3.0.20 on aix 5.2, and I don't want to use aio, but the build process is compiling it in anyway. By default, it isn't supposed to build in aio support, but it does. When I pass --with-aio-support=no to configure, it also builds in support. It builds in aio support whether I use gcc or xlc. Here's what ldd shows: # ldd bin/smbd bin/smbd needs:
2005 Sep 01
0
Beta test of Sparc Solaris packages (Samba 3.0.20)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I'm uploading a simple package of Samba 3.0.20 for Solaris 9 Sparc to samba.org. The configure options are ./configure --prefix=/opt/samba \ --with-acl-support \ --with-included-popt \ --localstatedir=/var/lib/samba \ --with-piddir=/var/run \ --with-logfilebase=/var/log/samba \ --with-privatedir=/etc/samba/private \
2005 Sep 07
1
Samba 3.0.20 - Windows 98 problem
Server - Samba 3.0.20 on INTEL P4 running Slackware 10.1 Client - Windows 98. Can log in, see, browse, and write. Just can't run simultaneous, same *.exe from 2 different computers with Windows 98 With Windows 2000, Xp this keep good time. On samba 3.0.14a, with same smb.conf this problem dont exist.
2005 Sep 08
0
Samba 3.0.20 winbindd problem on x86-64
We've been having some problems with winbind authentication recently (on 3.0.13) so I've upgraded to 3.0.20 (including all the patches on http://www.samba.org/samba/patches/). This works perfectly on all our 32-bit systems but seems to break badly on the 64-bit systems. Fetching user and group lists (via 'wbinfo -u' and 'wbinfo -n') work fine, as does looking up SIDs (via