similar to: 3.0.7 - NT Create AndX Response, Error:, QUERY_PATH_INFO, Error:

<earlier, David Rankin wrote to no avail:> Mates, I have been watching a developing problem over the past few weeks. Most likely a M$ patch to XP that has caused problems. What happens is that XP clients try to open the standard "File" -> "Open" dialog (like in word, or whatever) and the file open dialog hangs and stops responding for 15 seconds or so. I have

Samba errors with smb QUERY_PATH_INFO, Error: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUNDFrom: Timothy D Newcomb Subject: Samba errors with smb QUERY_PATH_INFO, Error: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND > Did you get an answer for this ? I am seeing it on an XP box and I have > the same problem..slow load time...in "my computer" Tim, No I didn't, thanks for the reply. I just figured that

We are experiencing some slowness when opening files from a Samba file share using Microsoft Word 2003. Upon examination with Ethereal it became apparent that Session Setup AndX calls are taking a long time to complete, varying from 2 to 8 seconds between the time the client provides an NTLMSSP_AUTH and the server responds. I have also noticed a peculiar NetBIOS name query for

In trying to track down some performance issues, I'm finding with Ethereal that, when I launch an application from my Windows server, the SMB Read AndX Request packets have Min Count, Max Count Low, and Remaining all at 512 bytes. When launching the same application on the same client from a Win2000 share, these requests are coming in much larger sizes (4096 and 32768 were both observed). This

Hello everyone, I'm currently writing an SMB client program but I ran into a nasty bug. The problem occurs if I send an trans2 request (find first2 for example) after an andx create request; the returned error in the trans2 request is STATUS_INVALID_INFO_CLASS. I have no idea what that means...did not find any information regarding this. The error/problem does not occur when I don't

Hi all, I'm running version 3.0.28a on Ubuntu linux, and apparently from a day to another I got performance issues: without any change in smb.conf (except a few added shares) I have mac osx and linux clients getting a very slow upload/download speed. I've checked with other protocols, like scp and performances are good, so I can exclude a network/hardware problem. Other clients are

Does samba server handle multiple smb commands (not necessarily andx commands) within one packet? If a client were to send commands such as 0x2f, 0x32, 0x32 in one packet instead of three separate packets, does samba server handle it i.e. respond to each of the three requests?

Hi, We're doing some of performance tests with Linux Samba v3. We're comparing WinXP/Win2k clients vs OS2 clients accessing a samba server. For one test, we're coping 10.000 small files. Let's say, we run the command copy \\sambaserver\10000files\*.* c:\data\10000files With an OS2 client it takes 23 seconds to complete. With an Windows client it takes 460 seconds to complete.

Hi, We're doing some of performance tests with Linux Samba v3. We're comparing WinXP/Win2k clients vs OS2 clients accessing a samba server. For one test, we're coping 10.000 small files. Let's say, we run the command copy \\sambaserver\10000files\*.* c:\data\10000files With an OS2 client it takes 23 seconds to complete. With an Windows client it takes 460 seconds to complete.

Samba Version: 3.4.7 OS: Ubuntu Lucid 10.04 Setup: This samba box is a member of a win2k active directory domain and functions as a file server. Files/directories shared out utilize file system acls. smb.conf portion for share in question: [Accounting] comment = Accounting Share path = /netdrives/accounting browsable = yes read only = no map archive = no map system = yes

Hi, We have been a samba shop since way back and have used DFS quit a lot the last years. When we went with security ads instead of domain our dfs died. We have tried 3.028(sun) in solaris wich we are leaving and 3.2.1 in linux, our migration target. For our 3.2.1 installation the config looks liket this and the problem manifests itself as a empty share. [Global] kernel oplocks = False oplocks

Hi, I'm trying to replace a windows fileserver server with a Fedora Core 2 samba server in our Windows 2000 ADS domain. A performance problem occurs when accessing certain samba shares from Windows Explorer on either an Windows XP or a W2K client machine. It can take up to a minute for explorer to list files in a share folder containing only a few files! It eventually does, but but reports

Recently I had the chance to look at smb service response times over OpenVPN using Wireshark/TShark. Here are 2 samples. In both samples a Win XP Pro machine is connecting to a server running samba-3.3.7 and openvpn-2.0.6_9 on FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE. Location #1 =================================================================== SMB RTT Statistics: Filter: Commands Calls Min

I see *things* happening here. XP. Trying to access \\host\sharea. works fine \\host\shareb - pops up password window shares a and ba may vary between reboots. I spent 15 minutes scratching my head and finally tossed out "snoop port 445" So what I've seen. On shares I can access wxp do: 1. Send: Tree Connect AndX Request \\host\sharea 2. Receive: Tree Connect AndX Response 3.

Dear all, My question is described as follows. Server: Linux Samba-3.3.1 Client: Windows XP with SP3 Step1: connect to the samba server. Step2: select a directory name ?test?. (The directory is created before testing.) The client will send a lot of QUERY_FILE_INFO requests. According to data captured by Wireshark, I find the following phenomenon: The client repeats exactly the same

Hello mailinglist, I have a strange problem, which occurs sometimes on some WinXP clients. It is not 100% reproducable for me, but it returns regular. The problem is, that somehow a user can't delete a directory. All files in the directory will be removed successfully, but the directory itself not. Deleting with the Explorer or over the cmd-console returns in the same result. First the

I am getting the "Segmentation fault" when using hclust in R-1.9.1 running under SuSe 9.0 64-bit kernel on a dual opteron system with 8G of RAM. I was wandering if anybody could offer any insight? Thanks, mario.

Greetings, in our small network with about 10 Clients I got a problem when opening files or directories. If there were no actions between server and client for about 2 minutes or more, the very first action (open file, change path, etc) needs a long long time. The problem occurs on some clients (win 2k/xp), but not on every client. I tried a working smb configuration from home, but still no

Hi! I'm currently hunting a strange problem and looking for help! I have a samba3 fileserver (currently samba-3.0.20b, but problem can be reproduced with samba-3.0.7, but _not_ with samba2 like 2.2.8a), and I see performance problems when writing files with MS word 2002 SP3 from a NT4.0 (SP6a) workstation. Saving even the smallest file takes more than 10 seconds! Copying files with Windows

Hello again, Jeremy and other Samba experts, I'm sorry to be such a pain in your neck(s), but I still need your help in looking for help trying to find out why SMB2/3.1.1 in Samba 4.6.5 performs so much worse than SMB/1.5 in Samba 3.6.15 in scenarios with a huge number of small files. As requested by Jeremy, I have done wireshark "pcapng" captures of the four scenarios as