similar to: Problem with security = ads

Preston Briggs wrote: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Sanjoy Das > <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com <mailto:sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>> > wrote: > > > > Sorry for having been quiet for so long, I have my university exams > > going on, and will be able to contribute only after the coming Friday. > > Gents, > > While you've been

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Sorry for having been quiet for so long, I have my university exams > going on, and will be able to contribute only after the coming Friday. Gents, While you've been fooling around with exams, I have been focused with laser-like intensity, or something... Here are new versions of 4 SIV

Hi, yes there is a way. Have a close look at the samba VFS modules. Vfs objects = recycle Recycle: repository = .recyclebin_or_whatever_you_want Recycle: keeptree = yes With this, everything you delete is going to a directory .recyclebin_or_whatever_you_want in the share. Ok, it is not the original recycler of windows, but much better than throwing the files away. Michael

On Mon, 14 May 2012 11:46:02 -0700 Preston Briggs <preston.briggs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Sanjoy Das > <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > > > Sorry for having been quiet for so long, I have my university exams > > going on, and will be able to contribute only after the coming > > Friday. > > Gents, >

Hi All, I have a Data.frame that looks like that one below. I would like to do some text mining on it to possibly find some patterns between Opis, ACklasifikacija and Vodja. I looked over a tm package which loks promissing, more specifically DocumentTermMatrix or TermDocumentMatrix. But I can not figure out how to change my data from data.frame to Corpus or VCorpus. Globina

> > Here's a version of Banerjee and Wolfe's Exact SIV test: > > https://sites.google.com/site/parallelizationforllvm/weak-siv-test > > It assumes you've already filtered out the easy cases handled by ZIV, > > strong SIV, etc. > > > > I'm not confident about my uses of APInt. If you have any comments, > > I'd love to hear them. >

Hi Sanjoy, Here's a version of Banerjee and Wolfe's Exact SIV test: https://sites.google.com/site/parallelizationforllvm/weak-siv-test It assumes you've already filtered out the easy cases handled by ZIV, strong SIV, etc. I'm not confident about my uses of APInt. If you have any comments, I'd love to hear them. Thanks, Preston On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Sanjoy Das

On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:16:47 -0700 Preston Briggs <preston.briggs at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sanjoy, > > Here's a version of Banerjee and Wolfe's Exact SIV test: > https://sites.google.com/site/parallelizationforllvm/weak-siv-test > It assumes you've already filtered out the easy cases handled by ZIV, > strong SIV, etc. > > I'm not confident about my

Hello. I experience a problem when I try to run LLVM tests on the ARM "Beagle" board with Debian Lenny installed on it. When I execute "make check", I get the following output: llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/markhor/llvm/nativeBuild/test' Making a new site.exp file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -v 512000

Hello, i'm fresh new to xapian (and impressed.. fast, faster, xapian). And so i have a problem with no solution at the moment. I have a webapp based on php5 in a special fastcgi loop environment (thus there are some loops spawned handling multiple requests so there is no need for php to recreate classes and Objects all the time). I implemented a xapian wrapper class to access a remote

Hello. I experience a problem when I try to run LLVM tests on the ARM "Beagle" board with Debian Lenny installed on it. When I execute "make check", I get the following output: llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/markhor/llvm/nativeBuild/test' Making a new site.exp file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -v 512000

Hi Sanjoy, I reworked the code for analyzeStrongSIV to fix a couple of mistakes, plus squeeze all the advantage possible from the symbolic manipulation provided by the SCEVs. It's sketched out here: https://sites.google.com/site/parallelizationforllvm/strong-siv-test Does it makes sense to you? Thanks, Preston On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Preston Briggs <preston.briggs at

Gents, I spent some time reading over Sanjoy's patch for LoopDependenceAnalysis. Unfortunately, an early version of these notes escaped; this is the complete review. First off, I agree with his choice to implement the SIV tests. For scientific Fortran, the SIV (and the simpler ZIV) tests cover about 85% of the cases in practice. For C and C++, I expect the percentage will be much higher.

Hi Sanjoy, I wondered: >> In LoopDependenceAnalysis::AnalyzePair, what's going to happen if we >> have something like this >> >> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) >>   for (j = 0; j < n; j++) >>     A[i][j]++; >> >> versus >> >> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) >>   for (j = 0; j < n; j++) >>     A[j][i]++; > I think this

I'm running linux and I'm having a problem installing syslinux 3.20 . When I type use the "make" command in the unix folder, I get the error "make: *** No rule to make target `bootsect_bin.o', needed by `syslinux'. Stop.". How do I get rid of this error? Thanks, Jacob Egner

Hi Sanjoy, Reading through LoopDependenceAnalysis::analyseStrongSIV(), I noticed one problem and one confusion. My confusion related to your naming of the two instructions as A and B. It's consistent all through LoopDependenceAnalysis. I'd prefer something like source and destination, so I can keep track of which is which. It didn't matter so much when you were simply proving or

Hi, When I write various test cases and explore how they're handled by the code in LoopDependenceAnalysis::analysePair, I'm surprised. This loop collects pairs of subscripts from the source and destination refs. * // Collect GEP operand pairs (FIXME: use GetGEPOperands from BasicAA), adding* * // trailing zeroes to the smaller GEP, if needed.* * GEPOpdsTy destOpds, srcOpds;* *

When I run SIV (http://rh-software.com/) on wine in XP mode all works as expected some buttons don't get displayed when I use Windows 7 mode. I can tell they are present as when I press [Copy] they are present in the chipboard. Needles to say but on real Windows systems all is as expected. What do I need to do to get this to work please?

Hi, Here is a preliminary (monolithic) version you can comment on. This is still buggy, however, and I'll be testing for and fixing bugs over the next few days. I've used your version of the strong siv test. Thanks! -- Sanjoy Das. http://playingwithpointers.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch.diff Type: application/octet-stream

Hello, I'm having trouble when I try do get a group SID from my domain, the user lookup and authentication is working fine. Actually what I'm trying to do is to authenticate squid against MS AD using winbind. I need to restrict access by group, so I'm using wbinfo_group.pl to do it. The machine has been built to be a proxy server only. I'm using Suse Linux 9.3 Professional