Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Binding to Tun0 device"
2005 Aug 12
3
wbinfo -t not working on BDC
Hi,
I just can't seem to get winbind to work on my BDC. I'm using FC3 and
samba 3.0.20rc2. My PDC is RHEL4 running Samba 3.0.14a. / Openldap.
I can join the BDC to the domain successfully using "net rpc join..." ,
but when i enter wbinfo -t to check the trust relationship i get
checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed
error code was (0x0)
Could not check secret
I
2005 Aug 14
5
RPM SPEC rebuild errors
Hello All,
I have been trying all afternoon to rebuild the Samba RPM for my Fedora
3 with the MySQL passdb support and from what I can see it only needs
the inclusion of "--with-expsam=mysql" in the SPEC file in addition to
the regular ones.
The problem is that no matter what version of Samba I try to rebuild, it
always gice an error at the same place:
2005 May 04
1
The 'nobody' account (mapping not found for gidNumber: 99)
Hi,
I am using a samba domain controller with an LDAP backend. I am also
using samba domain controllers with this setup similar to those
described in the 'Domain Members, Updating Samba and Migration' chapter
of the Samba By Example book.
On the domain member servers winbind stores the UID<->SID in the Idmap
section of the directory. This appears to be working correctly, however
2005 Apr 08
2
Nagging error
Hello to all.
I keep getting the same error in the logs of all my Samba boxes:
Apr 8 09:00:19 hanover smbd[19917]: [2005/04/08 09:00:19, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(384)
Apr 8 09:00:19 hanover smbd[19917]: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4.
Error = Connection reset by peer
If this has been posted before, my apologies. I've RTFM, and I've googled for
a solution, and
2005 Aug 18
1
Access to shares from a machine with no trust account
Hi folks
I don't understand why it is possible to access a share on the samba
server from a pc that hasn't a Trust Account on the samba server.
All i do is to log in on the pc with a local login account (not in the domain).
Then i can access the shares in the following way on the server:
\\server\MyShare
pc asks for username/password --> i login with a valid combination -->
i get
2006 Jun 22
1
Fw: computer outside domain can access resource to inside
Thank's for you Guys, Wolfgang and Ian,
I think I will try to read about Winbind and implement it in my PDC.
But, what do you think about my theory. Is it right ?
"Users cannot access resources in the network if they don't join to Domain.
And, only administrator with root user+password can make users joined to
Domain"
Thanks
SA
2006 Aug 19
1
Samba & ACLs?
How exactly do Samba 3.x and ACLs interrelate? With
the mount parameter I've turned on ACLs on the whole
filesystem that Samba has various pointers into
(including all the home directories and the netlogon).
I started out naively assuming that the *nix
uidNumber/gidNumber Samba mapped the end user to would
behave exactly the same whether they were a Samba user
or were logged on locally. But
2006 Jun 21
2
computer outside domain can access resource to inside
Dear,
I have PDC Server running under Redhat 9 and use samba 2.2.7. It has running until now.
That I know, users cannot access resources in the network if they don't join to Domain. And, only administrator with root user+password can make users joined to Domain.
But, I have one problem.
There is one user, bring the private notebook. He create ip address (same with his office-computer),
2005 Jun 14
1
Proper behavior of Interdomain Trust uid mappings
Hi there,
I'm running Samba 3.0.14a-sernet on Suse 9.1 using ldapsam.
I've got an interdomain trust setup across a vpn connection with a
2k3sp1 domain (DOMB).
The trust works.
What is strange is that a user from DOMB can't access any shares until
they browse a share on our domain controller, say netlogon, then samba
creates a new posix account for them in the ou=users base.
I have
2005 Jun 07
2
updating samba via rpm
good afternoon,
current status:
samba pdc running samba 3.0.10-1.fc3 on fedora core 3 on a dell server.
clients are windows 2000 pro workstations.
authentication is via tdbsam.
pretty vanilla setup. no active directory, ldap, winbind, etc.
i have downloaded the rpm's from samba.org for current stable release samba
3.0.14a-1. usually i perform upgrades to samba server using rpm -Fvh
2005 Jun 30
3
winbind creating duplicate users
Hi everybody,
I'm having a problem with winbind creating 2 entries for some of my
users that really wrecking my head ;-/ .
My situation is as follows :
I have a typical Samba (3.0.14a)/LDAP setup. I have a trusted domain
(another Samba/LDAP setup) and use winbind to map the users from the
foreign domain, with the UID to SID mappings stored in LDAP . This works
very well.
The relevant part
2005 Apr 20
2
Samba 3.0.9 on RHEL 3.0
All,
Smbpasswd -j DOMAIN is no longer the way to join a Windows domain
instead one needs to use net join. However, net utility, although it's a
part of Samba release, is not present on the system. Samba was installed
using rpm packages. Here is what's on the system:
samba-3.0.9-1.3E.1
samba-common-3.0.9-1.3E.1
samba-swat-3.0.9-1.3E.1
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Jarek
2008 Mar 26
8
Hub/Spoke OpenVPN can't communicate from Client A to Client B - FORWARD:REJECT:IN=tun0 OUT=tun0
Hi, I am running OpenVPN where i have one central hub VPN server, and multiple spoke VPN clients. I can ping from each client to the server and each client to computers on the subnet which the server resides (192.168.2.0/24) so it works ok there. I cannot however, ping from one client to another client. I guess the packet path would go:
clienta -> vpn -> shorewall/router -> vpn ->
2005 Apr 20
2
nsswitch.conf & winbind
Hi!
When a configured samba server i enter the following
command, i don't see any of my domain user.
MORGOTH:~# getent passwd
root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
daemon:x:1:1:daemon:/usr/sbin:/bin/sh
bin:x:2:2:bin:/bin:/bin/sh
sys:x:3:3:sys:/dev:/bin/sh
...
nobody:x:65534:65534:nobody:/home:/bin/sh
guillaume:x:1000:1000:Guillaume
C.,,,:/home/guillaume:/bin/bash
2016 Mar 03
2
issue with tinc and libvirt / Network is already in use by interface tun0
2005 Apr 27
1
Winbind samba pdc
Hi,
I still have my problem that my samba PDC doesnt want to accept
winbind queries.
wbinfo -u or -g or -t does only generate errors. the logfiles show a
blissfull silence.
who has a working PDC with winbind in samba? I really need it urgently now!
Here is my smb.conf file
[global]
workgroup = SMB3
netbios name = SMB-TEST
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -m %u
delete user script =
2016 Mar 04
2
AW: issue with tinc and libvirt / Network is already in use by interface tun0
>> I have tinc up and running on a kvm/libvirt host. libvirt creates a
>> bridge and assigns ip to this bridge, for instance 192.168.1.1. All
>> guests have an ip within 192.168.1.0/24. I want to access the guests
>> in this libvirt network with tinc from the internet via the host.
>[...]
>> and tinc.conf like this
>[...]
>> Interface = tun0
>>
2002 Oct 10
1
Solaris tun0 problem
I'm trying to set up tinc on a Solaris 8 machine, but am having some
problems setting the MAC addres on the tun0 interface to fe:fd:0:0:0:0
The error I'm seeing is:
ifconfig: set_phys_addr failed: dl_errno 7 errno 0
ifconfig: failed setting mac address on tun0
Has anyone successfully setup tinc & tun0 on a Solaris machine?
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards,
Tim Evans
--
2016 Mar 05
3
AW: AW: issue with tinc and libvirt / Network is already in use by interface tun0
>> Sorry, I don't get it. I thought the Subnet parameter is indented for
>> routing local nets to the remote host.
>> This way a remote host can access the provided local nets.
>>
>> What I have is my host A with vms (ips within 192.168.1.0/24).
>> My host A has a bridge to the vm's network. The bridge has the IP
>> 192.168.1.1. Furthor more
2016 Mar 05
2
AW: issue with tinc and libvirt / Network is already in use by interface tun0
>>
>> Nice hint, but it's not this simple. Libvirt complains about the
>> network not the interface. The interfaces have different names already.
>> It seems like tinc bind the subnet on startup and libvirt doesn't
>> like it
> Well, if it's about the subnet, then it's up to you to change the
> Subnets in the host config files (and change