similar to: 3.0.20rc2 infinite dir loop

A few weeks ago, I upgraded Samba 3.0.1x to 3.0.14a . After the upgrade, all completed printjobs on all 40 printers stayed in samba's print queue (they were removed from the unix-printqueue). When I installed 3.0.20rc2, everything back to normal. But since the upgrade this weekend to 3.0.20, the same thing happens again: no jobs were removed from the samba printerqueue's. Removing

We have an occasional problem which manifests with multiple processes being created for a particular user. For example, for a user "xy004": xy004 8463 0.0 0.0 6.02M 0K ?? IW 11:48:59 0:02.02 smbd xy004 9426 0.0 0.0 5.99M 0K ?? IW 11:52:18 0:03.68 smbd xy004 10433 0.0 0.0 5.81M 0K ?? IW 12:17:20 0:00.85 smbd xy004

Hello All, I am running a CentOS 4.6 file server for a small office network and I am getting a lot of strange webdav requests from one of the Windows workstations - I have not configured Webdav on the Windows host (hereafter "windows-laptop") in question. Some details - I have configured a Samba share called (say) "share1" on the CentOS server and the windows-laptop connects

On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 04:25:28PM +0000, Jones Syue ??? wrote: >Hello Ivan, > >'FastCopy' has an option to revise max I/O size and works for SMB :) >it is a tool for file transferring and could be installed to win10, >download here: https://fastcopy.jp/ > >This is an example for writing, a job would write a file named '1GB.img' >from a local disk

I have an old dos app that doesn't run in the win95 shell very well. There are problems with the graphics. Is it possible to connect to a samba server from real dos? I assume the answer is no but I thought I would check. Verne Ball vball@socrates.berkeley.edu

> > > Does the wireshark trace show the Windows client asking for and > getting a RWH lease under SMB2 ? If so, then there's no reason > it can't be caching the entire file locally. Seems strange > behaviour from the Windows redirector here. > I have uploaded the Linux packet capture here (14MB): https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6UHr3GQEkQwWXJ1NjVwMkJXOEU Also,

Bobby Eshleman wrote: > We're testing usage of vsock as a way to redirect guest-local UDS > requests to the host and this patch series greatly improves the > performance of such a setup. > > Compared to copying packets via userspace, this improves throughput by > 121% in basic testing. > > Tested as follows. > > Setup: guest unix dgram sender -> guest vsock

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Ralph Boehme wrote: >On 8/21/23 11:53, Jones Syue ??? via samba wrote: >>>OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is >>>changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? >> >>It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+ >>redirector, so far not quite sure how to make it, >>per

On 8/21/23 11:53, Jones Syue ??? via samba wrote: >> OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is >> changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? > > It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+ > redirector, so far not quite sure how to make it, > per process monitor (procmon) could show that write I/O size seems > could be pass

On 8/21/23 22:55, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Ralph Boehme wrote: >> On 8/21/23 11:53, Jones Syue ??? via samba wrote: >>>> OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is >>>> changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? >>> >>> It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+

Hi, I've the following error when I want to create a conditionnal redirector in samba 4 : " server complex operation 'IpValidate' not implemented  " Version : Version 4.6.7-Ubuntu Not using bind9 but Samba 4 DNS internal Must I user bind 9 ? My goal is to create un approbation between AD2016 et samba 4. Regard -- *Hervé* *HÉNOCH* *Responsable informatique* Tél. :

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== Oplocks are strange -- Volker Lendecke ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is a release candidate of the 3.0.20 code base and is provided for

Hi folks :-) situation: debian stable (samba version 2:3.2.5-4lenny9) from clients by ftp the transfer of huge file is about 10/11Mb/s (with an ethernet 10/100) by samba came 5/6Mb/s is it correct? In smb.conf I don't have any "strange"options: thanks Pol domain master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 65 workgroup = WORKGROUP netbios name = name Server String = name

I'm running Samba 2.2.3 with winbind for authentication. Much to my surprise, I found I had a need to connect an MS-DOS system to the network. I'm using MSCLIENT to do so. I can successfully log into the domain and map drives on Windows NT servers, but I'm having trouble mapping Samba shares. Examining the log shows that the DOS machine is apparently trying to connect with a username

Hello Jeremy, > OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is > changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+ redirector, so far not quite sure how to make it, per process monitor (procmon) could show that write I/O size seems could be pass from the application layers,

> The Linux client is asking for SMB1 and using 1MB write sizes. > > The Windows client is using SMB2 and *NOT ASKING FOR LEASES*. > > This is why the performance is terrible. Because the file > as no lease, the Windows redirector must pass every single > WriteFile() system call onto the wire, no matter how small > the size. > > If you can get the Windows SMB2 client

Jerry, Jeremy, Whilst fixing bug 2445, I stumbled across NFSv4 ACLs with EA version 2 capability. This is only supported on filesystems that are created JFS2 with Extended Attribute Version 2 support which is part of the NFSv4 ACL support native to JFS2 in AIX 5.3. This is new in AIX 5.3 and I'd like to get to work implementing it as an addition to Linux and IRIX EA support. Are the any

If you have the need to implement 5 asterisk boxes each one handling only 100 ulaw calls (same dialplan,etc.) logging to a six MYSQL server , what do you use in *front* of the asterisks? Codecs, hardware,etc is not important. The thing that Im trying to figure out is how do I present the asterisk servers to a bunch of phones and/or FXStoSIP boxes. a sip proxy is not the solution because the sip

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== My life is driven by bugzilla -- Jeremy Allison ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of the 3.0.20 code base and is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== My life is driven by bugzilla -- Jeremy Allison ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of the 3.0.20 code base and is