similar to: HELP - Can't See the Forest for The TREES???

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "HELP - Can't See the Forest for The TREES???"

2004 Sep 24
1
Compile from source FAILED - Mandrake 7.2
Mates, The saga continues, but THANK GOD 'make revert' WORKS. Here is my problem. I am trying to compile 3.0.7 from source and install it on my Mandrake 7.2 box. The gcc compiler is 2.95.3. Here is what I have done: [stop samba] # ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-smbmount # make # make install # /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start Here is what I get: [root@Nemesis david]# tail
2004 Sep 25
1
Printer Share Not Shown by smbclient on 3.0.7
Mates, What would cause smbclient not to list my printer share?? (mandrake 7.2, 2.2.19 kernel) [david@Nemesis david]$ smbclient -U% -L localhost Domain=[RB_LAW] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.7] Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- guillory Disk David Guillory Bertin Disk Darren Bertin Rankin
2004 Sep 25
0
mdk 7.2 init.d script Mystery....
James, I have sent this to you directly and cc:ed the list for reasons that should become apparent below. THE SITUATION OS: mdk 7.2, 2.2.19 kernel - basically bone stock Latest addtions: samba 3.0.7-1 compiled from source (working fine); cups-1.1.18-1 from mdk rpm Reasons for additions: XP SP2 fun and games THE MYSTERY As any normal person does, I use
2007 Aug 24
4
Samba 3.0.25c Going Nuts on our Network???
POSTED TO THE LIST W/O ATTACHMENTS -------- Jerry, I am sending this to you directly because it contains the tcpdump information in addition to the samba logs just in case there is sensitive information contained in the files. What is happening is that samba 3.0.25c, after first running smoothly, is becoming very "chatty" across our LAN. I don't know why, but with no files or
2005 Feb 25
0
3.0.7 - NT Create AndX Response, Error:, QUERY_PATH_INFO, Error:
<earlier, David Rankin wrote to no avail:> Mates, I have been watching a developing problem over the past few weeks. Most likely a M$ patch to XP that has caused problems. What happens is that XP clients try to open the standard "File" -> "Open" dialog (like in word, or whatever) and the file open dialog hangs and stops responding for 15 seconds or so. I have
2004 Apr 06
0
Fw: Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
Not sure if this got through the 1st time, so I am trying a repost. I appologize if you get this twice, but I need help! -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin * Bertin, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 (936) 715-9333 (936) 715-9339 fax www.rankin-bertin.com -- ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Rankin" <drankin@cox-internet.com> To: "samba"
2010 Jan 11
1
matchname messages filling logs - howto stop?
Listmates, I have had a few boxes where the 'matchname' message is filling my syslog with one new message ever ~40 seconds or so. No performance problems, just the log annoyance. An example of the messages are: Jan 11 13:43:03 nemesis smbd[2246]: [2010/01/11 13:43:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:1685(get_peer_name) Jan 11 13:43:03 nemesis smbd[2246]: Matchname failed on Adrienne-PC.rbpllc.com
2009 Jul 10
0
Broken Pipes openSuSE 10.3 samba-3.3.4
Guys, After upgrade to samba 3.3.4 on openSuSE 10.3, I'm getting: Jul 10 02:05:14 bonza smbd[31942]: [2009/07/10 02:05:14, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(1136) Jul 10 02:05:14 bonza smbd[31942]: [2009/07/10 02:05:14, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1676) Jul 10 02:05:14 bonza smbd[31942]: getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Jul 10 02:05:14 bonza
2004 Apr 03
0
Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
Andrew, Jerry and the rest of the team: Hello again! It has been quite some time since I was here and waded the waters to set up bind8 and samba 2.07 on my trust mdk 7.2 box. (by the way, it is still working like a champ) over 400 days uptime before the last extended power outage. Well, obviously a lot has changed since the 2.07 days and I am now working on a SuSE 8.2 box with samba 2.2.7a
2001 Apr 22
5
Slow Copy WinXX - Linux/Samba :-(
I never thought it would happen to me, but it did... I have read threads about slow copies from WinXX to Linux/Samba on the list in the past, but I don't recall a concise answer regarding what the cause was. THE PROBLEM: Trying to copy an 8 meg file from Win95 to my Linux/Samba box (named "Nemesis" - for good reason), the transfer speed slows to a crawl. The Win95 copy dialog box
2004 Apr 19
0
XP browse list????
Mates, Maybe I'm missing something very, very basic! I cannot see the share on my XP boxes. smbclient gives the following: skyline:/home/david # smbclient -U% -L ripper added interface ip=192.168.6.14 bcast=192.168.6.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Got a positive name query response from 127.0.0.1 ( 192.168.6.100 ) Domain=[RB_LAW] OS=[Windows 5.1] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager]
2006 Aug 10
6
3.0.20 -> 3.0.23 SID/group error?? Won't connect.
Gerry, all: HELP! On mandriva, I compiled samba from source and got it running, but I cannot connect from windows. (see my post from earlier "[Samba] Compiling and Configuring Samba for Mandrival") I think this relates to the group/SID changes discussed in the release notes. However, I'm not smart enough to figure it out. The tarball compiled and installed fine. It
2004 Sep 22
0
Compiled 3.0.7-1 on Mandrake 7.2 -- Did it work?
Mates, Just got done configuring and compiling 3.0.7-1 on my Mandrake 7.2 box. The process was as follows: ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-smbmount make The following is a listing of the ../bin directory. Does it look like all the pieces got built and are about the right size?? Any feedback before doing the 'make install' would be appreciated..... [root@Nemesis source]# ls -al
2006 Aug 30
13
Rev #2 of the 3.02.3c patch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I've uploaded the *final* 3.0.23c roll up patch to http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz. I've already cut the 3.0.23c tarballs so unless there is a major problem, this will be the final change set. Please report *any* bugs that you find. I'd like to wrap this one up and do the public 3.0.23c
2004 May 04
0
Testing to see if drive mounted with smbmount
Mates, I have set up a backup scheme that uses rsync to backup shares from my mdk 7.2 box to an old ibm box that is running win95. Basically I use "smbmount //backup/d /mnt/backup -o password=" to mount the ibm's d:/ as /mnt/backup. How can I test to see if the drive is still mounted without using another smbmount call prior to starting the rsync backup. smbmount works for this,
2004 Sep 22
1
mdk 7.2, Upgrade 2.0.9 to 3.0.7, Help with ./configure
Mates, In following chapter 35 "How to Compile Samba" I have looked at ./configure --help and I have a few questions. Originally I installed 2.0.9 via RPM, and of course there are no longer RPMs for mdk 7.2. On 7.2, smbd and nmbd are installed in /usr/sbin. The docs are in /usr/share/doc/samba-2.0.9. I don't know where the rest of the pieces of the puzzle were scattered by
2008 Nov 12
2
Bizarre - How did windows user setfacl for a file??
Listmates, In 8 years, since 2.02 (I think), I have never seen this behavior out of samba. I run a stand-alone server with WinXP clients. Somehow a legal assistant created (not intentionally mind you) files and directories with ACL attributes set: -rwxrwx---+ 1 cyndy ochiltree 21504 2008-10-28 16:48 AUTHORIZATION - employment.doc* -rwxrwx---+ 1 cyndy ochiltree 12804 2008-10-28 16:48
2005 Mar 03
2
Re: Samba errors with smb QUERY_PATH_INFO, Error: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND
Samba errors with smb QUERY_PATH_INFO, Error: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUNDFrom: Timothy D Newcomb Subject: Samba errors with smb QUERY_PATH_INFO, Error: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND > Did you get an answer for this ? I am seeing it on an XP box and I have > the same problem..slow load time...in "my computer" Tim, No I didn't, thanks for the reply. I just figured that
2004 Sep 24
1
sendfile failed
Mates, I'm trying to learn a little more. I have 3.0.7 running on Mandrake 7.2. I could see all the shares, but couldn't access the files "sendfile failed". I set use sendfile = No and all is well. I have a separate system Suse 9.0 pro with use sendfile = yes and I have no problems. What is the difference??? -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. RANKIN * BERTIN, PLLC 510 Ochiltree
2004 May 24
0
XP difficulties on 2.09
Guys, I think the answer to my question is to upgrade samba. However, since this is my production machine, I thought I would try and understand the problems I'm having a little better to insure that an upgrade will correct my issues. My setup - Mandrake 7.2, samba 2.09. Win98, ME and XP clients. The 98 and ME machines have no problems. The XP machine has some intermittent slowness