similar to: Acl and mask issue

Hmm, Yes Rowland it test also failed. id louis uid=10002(louis) gid=10000(domain users) groups=10000(domain users),27(sudo),10004(servers-ssh),10008(servers-www) louis at mailhopper2:~$ getent passwd louis obell:*:10002:10000:L.P.H. van Belle:/home/users/louis:/bin/bash The difference here is all my users have "Domain users" as primary group. Just like in windows, that the

On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:05:13 +0200 L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > > As said very busy, but i can spare a few minutes now. > > -rwxrwxr-x+ 1 3000000 domusers 2240 2018-06-18 17:33:55 /var/lib/samba/sysvol/hprs.local/policies/{3C103F7B-7250-4610-BC45-8B06353CAA7C}/User/Documents & Settings/fdeploy1.ini > -rwxrwx---+ 1 3000000 users 64 2018-06-18 17:34:22

Hai Rowland, Thats strange.. my test shows different things. A SSH login, SSO/kerberos on domain member with nfsv4 kerberized mounted homedir. Tested samba 4.8.8 and 4.9.4 (members) touch test-for-Rowland -rw-r----- 1 louis domain users 0 Feb 6 15:42 test-for-Rowland And i copied this from my w10 pc. -rwxrwx--- 1 louis domain users 0 Feb 6 15:42 test-for-Rowland - kopie

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 21:37:58 +0100 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:03:35 -0400 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Nevertheless, 'ls' does give names though I don't seem to have either > > libnss-winbind or libpam-winbind files on my AD/DC. > > I keep forgetting that you use slackware, I suppose it uses

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:50:15 +0100 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:39:46 +0200 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > And i did read the Comment to for Rowland below, > > On debian you need : > > libnss-winbind libpam-winbind to be installed. > > I think you miss one of these. > > They are

Hi, i have a problem with permission on a share mounted threw NFS i have a shared section like below [juridique] path = /samba/admin/services/juridique writeable = yes directory mask = 2770 create mask = 0770 valid users = @JURIDIQUE,@INFORMATIQUE inherit acls = yes browseable = no if a member of JURIDIQUE creates a folder or file it has the rights :

Gentlemen, I am struggling to solve this problem. My file server Samba 4.4.5. Even the administrator user (domain admin) could not write to the share. Could someone give me a hint, in order to solve this problem? shared folder: /mnt/data Folder permissions: # getfacl /mnt/data/teste/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: mnt/data/teste/ # owner: ricardo

Hi, I have an Ubuntu server acting as PDC on a LAN whose client have WIN Xp professional installed. Domain's users are divided into different groups. Let's focus on only two of them, say group1 and group2. Now I have a share defined in smb.conf as follows: [shareName] comment =

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 6 februari 2019 16:33 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] unix_primary_group = yes don t work > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:58:52 +0100 > L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > > > Hai

Hello, i hope u guys can help me. This is the first time I write to the list. Sorry about my english... i got a solaris 10 machine and installed "samba 3.0.2.3c" with "openldap 2.3.2.1" , "openssl 0.9.8" and "gcc 3.4.6". i configured kerberos and all the other things. all good. i added the samba-server (solaris10) to a active directory domain. with

Hi! Here is the Output: bash-3.00# id NTBV+neuwald uid=5000(NTBV+neuwald) gid=5006(NTBV+dom??nen-benutzer) bash-3.00# /usr/local/samba/bin/wbinfo -r NTBV+neuwald 5001 5002 5003 5004 5005 5006 5007 5008 5009 5010 5011 5012 5013 5014 5000 5015 5016 5017 5022 5029 5033 5035 5021 5023 5019 5032 5028 5027 5034 5020 5026 5030 5024 5018 5036 5025 5031 Ciao, Bj?rn -----Urspr?ngliche

Hi, I've allready seen a lot of posts about problems with Excel 2000, but I couldn't find one exactly matching my case. I'm using a self (and maybe badly) compiled samba 3.0.20 on debian, using ACLs. We're using ADS and winbind (some older NT4 domains remain) The users can't open some excel files, spitting a message such as 'the file is readonly or you're trying

All, I am building a glusterfs environment for file storage and need to use ACL's. The CentOS system is joined to AD. We have ingested data into the Gluster environment at /toplevel. OS: CentOS 7.3 Glusterfs: 3.10.5 Samba: 4.4.4 smb.conf: [global] workgroup = GROUP security = ADS realm = GROUP.DOMAIN.COM template homedir = /home/%U template shell

Hi, First of all, thx for fast answering. > I hope that the above commands are really right, because you said folder_a but the name of the folder is "folderA". Sorry, the commands are right :) > The all other things include the groupmaps? What do you mean... when i uses the command "./net groupmap list", i get the following back

Hi Mark, See below. ;-) > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Mark > Foley via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 13 juni 2018 22:50 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2 > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 08:50:00 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > > >

I will probably file a bug about this, but perhaps someone here will have some ideas. We have a problem with files being deleted instead of being saved when making changes in Microsoft Excel. The log shows an error of: 'Lock order violation'. This is with Samba 4.1.6 and happens on both Linux (2.6.25-14.fc9.i686) and Solaris 10. No such problem when running Samba 3.6.22. We have a setup

Hi, all. I could not add any additional users to a file or directory using the Windows Security tab in Windows XP Sp2. Here is my configuration for samba-3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2. # grep ACL config-2.6.18-8.el5 CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL=y CONFIG_NFS_ACL_SUPPORT=m # smbd -b | grep ACL HAVE_SYS_ACL_H

Hi, I have a share (testshare) where different unix groups (testgroup1, testgroup2) should have access to. But I want that new files are only created with 660 permissions. Here are the ACL's of testshare: # file: testshare # owner: ralfgro # group: ve user::rwx group::rwx group:testgroup1:rwx group:testgroup2:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::---

Hello folks, Samba 3.5.6 running and I have following share: [public] path = /data/public read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 directory security mask = 0750 vfs object = acl_xattr nt acl support = yes dos filemode = yes My filesystem ext4 which is mounted to /data supports acl,user_xattr and

Hello, I currently try to copy a directory locally between two ext4 filesystems while preserving permissions and ACLs using the -aAX options. Under some conditions, rsync does not copy the posix permissions completely, it changes the group::rwx to a group::--- permission. The latest rsync available on Debian Jessie is 3.1.1, but the changelog for 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 did not seem to mention such a bug